| Literature DB >> 29138675 |
Natalia Cichoń1, Piotr Czarny2, Michał Bijak1, Elżbieta Miller3,4, Tomasz Śliwiński5, Janusz Szemraj2, Joanna Saluk-Bijak1.
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is one of the most important signal molecules, involved in both physiological and pathological processes. As a neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, NO regulates cerebral blood flow, neurogenesis, and synaptic plasticity. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of the extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on generation and metabolism of NO, as a neurotransmitter, in the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Forty-eight patients were divided into two groups: ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF. Both groups underwent the same 4-week rehabilitation program. Additionally, the ELF-EMF group was exposed to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field of 40 Hz, 7 mT, for 15 min/day. Levels of 3-nitrotyrosine, nitrate/nitrite, and TNFα in plasma samples were measured, and NOS2 expression was determined in whole blood samples. Functional status was evaluated before and after a series of treatments, using the Activity Daily Living, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Mini-Mental State Examination. We observed that application of ELF-EMF significantly increased 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite levels, while expression of NOS2 was insignificantly decreased in both groups. The results also show that ELF-EMF treatments improved functional and mental status. We conclude that ELF-EMF therapy is capable of promoting recovery in poststroke patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29138675 PMCID: PMC5613626 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2181942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1ELF-EMF description. ΔB = 5 mT; T = 1.3 sec.
Clinical demographic characteristics.
| Control | Study group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | Age (mean ± SD) | 44.8 ± 7.7 | 48.0 ± 8.0 | 0.84 |
| Sex: man versus female (%) | 48 versus 52 | 60 versus 40 | 0.27 | |
| Living alone (%) | 32.1 | 34.2 | 0.59 | |
|
| ||||
| Vascular risk | Hypertension (%) | 97.3 | 98.5 | 0.07 |
| Diabetes (%) | 31.4 | 39.2 | 0.21 | |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 78.8 | 72.2 | 0.7 | |
| BMI ≥ 30 (%) | 21 | 34 | 0.78 | |
|
| ||||
| Concomitant medications | Antidepressants (%) | 29 | 34 | 0.5 |
| ASA (%) | 70 | 65 | 0.42 | |
| NSAID (%) | 25 | 27 | 0.8 | |
|
| ||||
| Stroke characteristics | Weeks since stroke (mean ± SD) | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | |
| NIHSS scores (mean ± SD) | 5.4 ± 2.9 | 4.9 ± 3.1 | ||
| ADL (mean ± SD) | 8.89 ± 2.87 | 9.95 ± 2.35 | 0.22 | |
|
| ||||
| Lesion location | Anterior ( | 3 | 5 | |
| Posterior ( | 7 | 6 | ||
| Intermediate ( | 13 | 14 | ||
|
| ||||
| Lesion side | Left ( | 15 | 13 | |
| Right ( | 8 | 12 | ||
Figure 2The comparison of 3-NT levels in plasma proteins obtained from the ELF-EMF group versus those from the non-ELF-EMF group. Statistical significance between the ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups: B versus D (p < 0.05).
Figure 3The comparison of nitrate/nitrite levels in plasma proteins obtained from the ELF-EMF group versus those from the non-ELF-EMF group. Statistical significance between ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups: B versus D (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The comparison of NOS2 mRNA expression obtained from the ELF-EMF group versus that from the non-ELF-EMF group.
Figure 5The comparison of TNFα levels in plasma proteins obtained from the ELF-EMF group versus those from the non-ELF-EMF group.
Clinical parameters: ADL, MMSE, and GDS measured in the ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups. Data presented as the delta of a clinimetric scale before and after the standard series of treatments (ΔADL = the increase of ADL; ΔMMSE = the increase of MMSE; and ΔGDS = the decrease of GDS).
| Non-ELF-EMF group | ELF-EMF group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADL | Before treatment | 8.99 | 9.95 | 0.378 |
| After treatment | 14.3 | 16.12 | 0.429 | |
| Δ | 5.31 | 6.17 | 0.194 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||
| MMSE | Before treatment | 22.75 | 23.00 | 0.873 |
| After treatment | 23.94 | 26.28 | 0.047 | |
| Δ | 1.19 | 3.28 | 0.036 | |
|
| 0.204 | 0.002 | ||
|
| ||||
| GDS | Before treatment | 11.38 | 13.00 | 0.054 |
| After treatment | 9.13 | 6.72 | 0.049 | |
| Δ | 2.25 | 6.28 | 0.018 | |
|
| 0.009 | 0.001 | ||