| Literature DB >> 32366004 |
Natalia Cichon1, Ewelina Synowiec2, Elzbieta Miller3, Tomasz Sliwinski2, Michal Ceremuga4, Joanna Saluk-Bijak5, Michal Bijak1.
Abstract
Apoptosis in acute stroke is associated with a negative prognosis and is correlated with the severity of the neurological deficit. However, there is no evidence that indicates that, in the subacute phase of the stroke, the apoptosis process might activate neuroplasticity. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effect of an extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on the molecular mechanism of apoptosis, as used in the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients. Patients with moderate stroke severity (n = 48), 3-4 weeks after incident, were enrolled in the analysis and divided into ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF group. The rehabilitation program in both groups involves the following: kinesiotherapy-30 min; psychological therapy-15 min; and neurophysiological routines-60 min. Additionally, the ELF-EMF group was exposed to an ELF-EMF (40 Hz, 5 mT). In order to assess the apoptosis gene expression level, we measured the mRNA expression of BAX, BCL-2, CASP8, TNFα, and TP53. We found that ELF-EMF significantly increased the expression of BAX, CASP8, TNFα, and TP53, whereas the BCL-2 mRNA expression after ELF-EMF exposition remained at a comparable level in both groups. Thus, we suggest that increasing the expression of pro-apoptotic genes in post-stroke patients promotes the activation of signaling pathways involved in brain plasticity processes. However, further research is needed to clarify this process.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; extremely low frequency electromagnetic field; neuroplasticity; stroke
Year: 2020 PMID: 32366004 PMCID: PMC7288134 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Device to generate extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF)—Magnetronic MF10 (EiE Elektronika i Elektromedycyna, Otwock, Poland).
Figure 2Comparison of the BAX mRNA expression acquired from the study group vs. control. Results formulated as parameter changes before and after therapy (100% expressed for the level of BAX mRNA expression in each patient sample before treatment). Statistical significance between ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups after 10 sessions amount to p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Comparison of the BCL-2 mRNA expression acquired from the study group vs. control. Results formulated as parameter changes before and after therapy (100% expressed for the level of BCL-2 mRNA expression in each patient sample before treatment).
Figure 4Comparison of the CASP8 mRNA expression acquired from the study group vs. control group. Results formulated as parameter changes before and after therapy (100% expressed for the level of CASP8 mRNA expression in each patient sample before treatment). Statistical significance between ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups after 10 sessions amount to p < 0.01.
Figure 5Comparison of the TNFα mRNA expression acquired from the study group vs. control group. Results formulated as parameter changes before and after therapy (100% expressed for the level of TNFα mRNA expression in each patient sample before treatment). Statistical significance between ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups after 10 sessions amount to p < 0.0001.
Figure 6Comparison of the TP53 mRNA expression acquired from the ELF-EMF group vs. the non-ELF-EMF group. Results formulated as parameter changes before and after therapy (100% expressed for the level of TP53 mRNA expression in each patient sample before treatment). Statistical significance between ELF-EMF and non-ELF-EMF groups after 10 sessions amount to p < 0.0001.