| Literature DB >> 29137637 |
Karolin Meixenberger1, Kaveh Pouran Yousef2, Maureen Rebecca Smith2, Sybille Somogyi3, Stefan Fiedler3, Barbara Bartmeyer4, Osamah Hamouda4, Norbert Bannert3, Max von Kleist2, Claudia Kücherer3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detailed knowledge of the evolutionary potential of polymorphic sites in a viral protein is important for understanding the development of drug resistance in the presence of an inhibitor. We therefore set out to analyse the molecular evolution of the HIV-1 subtype B integrase at the inter-patient level in Germany during a 20-year period prior to the first introduction of integrase strand inhibitors (INSTIs).Entities:
Keywords: Covariation; Drug resistance; HIV; Integrase; Polymorphisms; Time trend
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137637 PMCID: PMC5686839 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0887-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Number of HIV-1 integrase sequences per year/period of HIV-1 diagnosis
| Year of diagnosis | No. of HIV-1 sequences/year | No. of HIV-1 sequences/period |
|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 36 | 84 |
| 1987 | 3 | |
| 1988 | 17 | |
| 1989 | 28 | |
| 1990 | 0 | 58 |
| 1991 | 3 | |
| 1992 | 30 | |
| 1993 | 5 | |
| 1994 | 20 | |
| 1995 | 18 | 42 |
| 1996 | 7 | |
| 1997 | 7 | |
| 1998 | 10 | |
| 1999 | 7 | 49 |
| 2000 | 10 | |
| 2001 | 12 | |
| 2002 | 20 | |
| 2003 | 17 | 104 |
| 2004 | 22 | |
| 2005 | 24 | |
| 2006 | 41 |
Overall frequency (%) of minor INSTI resistance mutations and INSTI-selected mutations
| Overall frequency (%) of | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variant | minor INSTI resistance mutation | INSTI-selected mutation |
| M50I | 12.8 | |
| V54I | 0.9 | |
| G59E | 2.1 | |
| L68V | 1.2 | |
| L74I | 2.7 | |
| L74 M | 0.6 | |
| L101I | 36.8 | |
| S119R | 3.0 | |
| T122I | 24.3 | |
| T124A | 25.8 | |
| T124 N | ||
| T125A | 17.8 | |
| A128T | 0.9 | |
| E138D | 1.5 | |
| V151A | 0.3 | |
| V151I | 7.4 | |
| M154I | 18.4 | |
| K156 N | 5.3 | |
| E157Q | 2.4 | |
| G163E | 2.4 | |
| G163R | 0.3 | |
| V165I | ||
| H171Q | ||
| G193E | 10.1 | |
| V201I | 36.8 | |
| I203M | 3.3 | |
| T206S | 6.8 | |
| N222 K | ||
| S230G | 0.6 | |
| S230 N | 8.0 | |
| V260I | 0.3 | |
Fig. 1Ribbon model of the HIV-1 integrase monomer from two viewpoints. The model was constructed in PyMol [67] as an overlay of protein database structures 1ex4 [3] and 1k6y [4]. The NTD (aa 1–49) is coloured yellow, the CCD (aa 50–212) green, and the CTD (aa 213–288) red. Polymorphic sites are coloured grey
Fig. 2Levels of Shannon entropy at amino acid positions 1–278 of the HIV-1 integrase. Positions with entropy levels >0.75 and the three functional domains of the integrase are indicated
Fig. 3Amino acid variants with significant trends in frequency over time. The median frequencies of variants corresponding to the consensus B reference sequence within each period are indicated by filled circles with blue error bars indicating the 5th–95th percentile ranges. The median frequencies of variants differing from the consensus B reference sequence within each period are indicated by filled squares with red error bars indicating the 5th–95th percentile ranges. The median predicted slopes are depicted in blue or red solid lines. The 5th–95th percentile ranges of the model-predicted trends are indicated by dotted lines. Predicted slopes sl are given in units %/year. Positions are grouped by the three functional domains of the integrase. Positions showing trends in INSTI resistance-associated variants are shaded grey. *** time trend is significant at the P < 0.01 level, ** time trend is significant at the P < 0.05 level
Evolutionary coupling terms for covarying positions within the HIV-1 integrase
| position | position | ec |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 10 | 0.0823 |
| 10 | 17 | 0.0623 |
| 10 | 72 | 0.1550 |
| 10 | 122 | 0.0994 |
| 11 | 17 | 0.0668 |
| 11 | 21 | 0.0847 |
| 11 | 24 | 0.0924 |
| 11 | 31 | 0.0883 |
| 11 | 111 | 0.0858 |
| 11 | 119 | 0.0995 |
| 11 | 154 | 0.0500 |
| 17 | 31 | 0.0516 |
| 17 | 119 | 0.0562 |
| 17 | 124 | 0.0755 |
| 23 | 201 | 0.0721 |
| 24 | 25 | 0.0717 |
| 24 | 45 | 0.0543 |
| 24 | 72 | 0.0554 |
| 28 | 39 | 0.0826 |
| 31 | 154 | 0.0362 |
| 39 | 154 | 0.0449 |
| 39 | 201 | 0.1201 |
| 39 | 256 | 0.0559 |
| 39 | 265 | 0.0411 |
| 45 | 160 | 0.0757 |
| 72 | 265 | 0.0897 |
| 101 | 111 | 0.0738 |
| 101 | 112 | 0.0677 |
| 101 | 154 | 0.0740 |
| 112 | 124 | 0.0567 |
| 112 | 201 | 0.0612 |
| 119 | 122 | 0.2792 |
| 124 | 125 | 0.0466 |
| 124 | 211 | 0.0589 |
| 154 | 165 | 0.1792 |
| 154 | 256 | 0.0488 |
| 154 | 265 | 0.0647 |
| 157 | 160 | 0.1177 |
| 201 | 256 | 0.0781 |
| 201 | 265 | 0.0641 |
| 219 | 222 | 0.0730 |
| 234 | 253 | 0.0679 |
Evolutionary coupling terms ecij between position i and j with P < 0.005 and power > 0.95 are given
Fig. 4Significant couplings within the HIV-1 integrase. The size of the dots indicate the values of the evolutionary coupling terms ecij and are plotted mirrored for position i against position j. The dashed horizontal and vertical lines seperate the three functional domains of the integrase
Direct coupling terms for specific amino acid variants at covarying positions within the HIV-1 integrase
| Position | Amino acid α | Position | Amino acid β | e | Time trend | Minor INSTI resistance mutation | INSTI-selected mutation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | D | 122 | I | 0.0683 | * | ||
| 10 | E | 122 | I | −0.0753 | * | ||
| 11 | D | 119 | S | −0.0940 | * | ||
| 11 | D | 154 | I | −0.0527 | * | * | |
| 11 | D | 154 | M | 0.0335 | * | ||
| 11 | E | 119 | S | 0.0909 | * | ||
| 11 | E | 154 | I | 0.0577 | * | * | |
| 11 | E | 154 | M | −0.0368 | * | ||
| 17 | N | 124 | A | 0.0690 | * | ||
| 17 | S | 124 | A | −0.0598 | * | ||
| 23 | A | 201 | I | −0.0490 | * | ||
| 23 | A | 201 | V | 0.0525 | * | ||
| 23 | V | 201 | I | 0.0432 | * | ||
| 23 | V | 201 | V | −0.0443 | * | ||
| 31 | I | 154 | I | −0.0438 | * | ||
| 31 | V | 154 | I | 0.0352 | * | ||
| 39 | C | 154 | I | −0.0329 | * | ||
| 39 | C | 201 | I | 0.0776 | * | ||
| 39 | C | 201 | V | −0.0725 | * | ||
| 39 | S | 154 | I | 0.0384 | * | ||
| 39 | S | 201 | I | −0.0859 | * | ||
| 39 | S | 201 | V | 0.0828 | * | ||
| 72 | I | 265 | A | 0.0587 | * | ||
| 72 | I | 265 | V | −0.0612 | * | ||
| 72 | V | 265 | A | −0.0622 | * | ||
| 72 | V | 265 | V | 0.0676 | * | ||
| 101 | I | 111 | K | −0.0743 | * | ||
| 101 | I | 111 | T | 0.0334 | * | ||
| 101 | I | 154 | I | −0.0462 | * | * | |
| 101 | I | 154 | M | 0.0645 | * | * | |
| 101 | L | 154 | I | 0.0606 | * | * | |
| 101 | L | 154 | M | −0.0695 | * | ||
| 112 | A | 124 | A | 0.0205 | * | ||
| 112 | I | 124 | A | 0.0205 | * | ||
| 112 | I | 201 | I | 0.0482 | * | ||
| 112 | I | 201 | V | −0.0538 | * | ||
| 112 | T | 124 | A | −0.0447 | * | ||
| 112 | T | 201 | I | −0.0483 | * | ||
| 112 | T | 201 | V | 0.0490 | * | ||
| 119 | G | 122 | I | 0.0576 | * | ||
| 119 | P | 122 | I | 0.1303 | * | ||
| 119 | S | 122 | I | −0.1695 | * | * | |
| 119 | T | 122 | I | −0.0194 | * | ||
| 124 | A | 125 | T | 0.0266 | * | ||
| 124 | A | 125 | V | −0.0288 | * | ||
| 124 | A | 211 | K | −0.0568 | * | ||
| 124 | A | 211 | R | 0.0263 | * | ||
| 124 | A | 211 | T | 0.0294 | * | ||
| 124 | S | 125 | A | 0.0244 | * | ||
| 124 | T | 125 | A | −0.0205 | * | ||
| 154 | I | 165 | I | 0.0893 | * | * | |
| 154 | I | 165 | V | −0.0976 | * | * | |
| 154 | I | 256 | D | 0.0333 | * | ||
| 154 | I | 256 | E | −0.0369 | * | * | |
| 154 | I | 265 | A | 0.0520 | * | * | |
| 154 | I | 265 | V | −0.0484 | * | * | |
| 154 | M | 165 | I | −0.1011 | * | ||
| 154 | M | 165 | V | 0.1118 | * | ||
| 154 | M | 256 | E | 0.0525 | * | ||
| 154 | M | 265 | A | −0.0496 | * | ||
| 154 | M | 265 | V | 0.0482 | * | ||
| 157 | Q | 160 | K | −0.0632 | * | ||
| 157 | Q | 160 | Q | 0.0649 | * | ||
| 201 | I | 256 | D | 0.0623 | * | ||
| 201 | I | 256 | E | −0.0611 | * | * | |
| 201 | I | 265 | A | 0.0484 | * | * | |
| 201 | I | 265 | V | −0.0466 | * | * | |
| 201 | V | 256 | E | 0.0604 | * | ||
| 201 | V | 265 | A | −0.0535 | * | ||
| 201 | V | 265 | V | 0.0547 | * |
Couplings with time-trending amino acid variants, minor INSTI resistance mutations, and INSTI-selected mutations are indicated by a star