Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.

Literature DB >> 25719825

The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.

Lewis G Halsey¹, Douglas Curran-Everett², Sarah L Vowler³, Gordon B Drummond⁴.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2015 PMID： 25719825 DOI： 10.1038/nmeth.3288

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Methods ISSN： 1548-7091 Impact factor: 28.547

× No keyword cloud information.

27 in total

1. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors: Scott E Maxwell
Journal: Psychol Methods Date: 2004-06

2. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology.

Authors: Fiona Fidler; Mark A Burgman; Geoff Cumming; Robert Buttrose; Neil Thomason
Journal: Conserv Biol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.560

Review 3. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors: Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Date: 2007-11

4. Points of significance: Importance of being uncertain.

Authors: Martin Krzywinski; Naomi Altman
Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 28.547

5. The new statistics: why and how.

Authors: Geoff Cumming
Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2013-11-12

6. Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.

Authors: Geoff Cumming
Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2008-07

7. If a job is worth doing, it is worth doing twice.

Authors: Jonathan F Russell
Journal: Nature Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors: Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 34.870

Review 9. In defense of P values.

Authors: Paul A Murtaugh
Journal: Ecology Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 5.499

10. P-Value Precision and Reproducibility.

Authors: Dennis D Boos; Leonard A Stefanski
Journal: Am Stat Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 8.710

159 in total

1. Solutions for quantifying P-value uncertainty and replication power.

Authors: Laura C Lazzeroni; Ying Lu; Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy
Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 28.547

2. Response to Lazzeroni et al.

Authors: Lewis G Halsey; Douglas Curran-Everett; Sarah L Vowler; Gordon B Drummond
Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 28.547

3. Estimation statistics should replace significance testing.

Authors: Adam Claridge-Chang; Pryseley N Assam
Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 28.547

4. The Value of the P Value.

Authors: Dinesh Vyas; Archana Balakrishnan; Arpita Vyas
Journal: Am J Robot Surg Date: 2015-12

Review 5. Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Authors: Kevin Maik Jablonka; Daniele Ongari; Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Berend Smit
Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 60.622

6. Constructing Causal Diagrams for Common Perinatal Outcomes: Benefits, Limitations and Motivating Examples with Maternal Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy.

Authors: Gretchen Bandoli; Kristin Palmsten; Katrina F Flores; Christina D Chambers
Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.980

7. Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP.

Authors: Michael J Curtis; Richard A Bond; Domenico Spina; Amrita Ahluwalia; Stephen P A Alexander; Mark A Giembycz; Annette Gilchrist; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Andrew J Lawrence; David J MacEwan; Lawrence D F Moon; Sue Wonnacott; Arthur H Weston; John C McGrath
Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 8.739