| Literature DB >> 29137157 |
Ana Karina Marques Fortes Lustosa1, Antônia Carla de Jesus Oliveira2, Patrick Veras Quelemes3, Alexandra Plácido4, Francilene Vieira da Silva5, Irisdalva Sousa Oliveira6, Miguel Peixoto de Almeida7, Adriany das Graças Nascimento Amorim8, Cristina Delerue-Matos9, Rita de Cássia Meneses de Oliveira10, Durcilene Alves da Silva11, Peter Eaton12,13, José Roberto de Souza de Almeida Leite14,15,16.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles have been shown to possess considerable antibacterial activity, but in vivo applications have been limited due to the inherent, but low,Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; cashew gum; healing; hydrogel; silver nanoparticles; wounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137157 PMCID: PMC5713367 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1General reaction scheme for pthalation of cashew gum. The reaction proceeds via homogeneous esterification, with no side products.
Figure 2Attenuated total reflection (ATR)—Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of natural cashew gum (NCG) and phthalated-cashew gum (PhCG). Arrows indicated the new bands due to pthalation (see text).
Figure 3(A) Scheme of the in situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), using cashew gum (CG) and PhCG; (B) UV-Vis spectra and photographs of NCG-AgNPs and PhCG-AgNPs.
Figure 4Quantitative particle size analysis by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Merged results for samples (A) NCG-AgNPs (Mean: 119.7 ± 5.1 nm and Mode: 86.4 ± 4.7 nm, 6.36 × 1010 particles·mL−1) and (B) PhCG-AgNPs (Mean: 123.8 ± 8.9 nm and Mode: 103.1 ± 18.8 nm, 4.03 × 1010 particles·mL−1).
Figure 5Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of AgNPs. (A) NCG-AgNPs; (B) PhCG-AgNPs.
Figure 6Rheological analysis of hydrogels formulated with AgNPs: Viscosity (A) and Shear stress (B).
Figure 7Direct contact antibacterial effect of NCG-AgNPs (A,C) and PhCG-AgNPs (B,D) hydrogels, with the presence of halos of inhibition indicated by arrows.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of NCG-AgNPs and PhCG-AgNPs hydrogels.
| Bacterial Strain | NCG-AgNPs μM (μg Ag·mL−1) | PhCG-AgNPs μM (μg Ag·mL−1) | AgNO3 μM (μg Ag·mL−1) | Antibiotic (μg·mL−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MIC | ||
| 62.5 (6.75) | 250 (27) | 31.25 (3.37) | 250 (27) | 125 (13.5) | Oxacillin < 0.5 | ||
| 15.6 (1.68) | 15.6 (1.68) | 7.81 (0.84) | 7.81 (0.84) | 31.25 (3.37) | Meropenem < 0.5 | ||
Figure 8Representative images of the healing process caused by AgNPs-hydrogels on the back of rats models.
Figure 9Relation between the time of action of the NCG-AgNPs (A) and PhCG-AgNPs (B) hydrogels and the wound area in rats. * p < 0.05 statistical significance.