| Literature DB >> 29137126 |
Michael González-Durruthy1, Jose M Monserrat2, Bakhtiyor Rasulev3, Gerardo M Casañola-Martín4, José María Barreiro Sorrivas5, Sergio Paraíso-Medina6, Víctor Maojo7, Humberto González-Díaz8,9, Alejandro Pazos10,11, Cristian R Munteanu12,13.
Abstract
This study presents the impact of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on mitochondrial oxygen mass flux (Jm) under three experimental conditions. New experimental results and a new methodology are reported for the first time and they are based on CNT Raman spectra star graph transform (spectral moments) and perturbation theory. The experimental measures of Jm showed that no tested CNT family can inhibit the oxygen consumption profiles of mitochondria. The best model for the prediction of Jm for other CNTs was provided by random forest using eight features, obtaining test R-squared (R²) of 0.863 and test root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.0461. The results demonstrate the capability of encoding CNT information into spectral moments of the Raman star graphs (SG) transform with a potential applicability as predictive tools in nanotechnology and material risk assessments.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; carbon nanotubes; cytotoxicity; graph theory; mitochondria oxygen mass flux; spectral moments
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137126 PMCID: PMC5707603 DOI: 10.3390/nano7110386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1General workflow.
Figure 2Representative profiles of the mitochondrial oxygen mass flux of isolated rat liver mitochondria (Y2: Red curve).
Figure 3Representation of mitochondrial ADP/ATP exchange and oxidative phosphorylation. ***p is used to represent the significant statistical differences between V3 state-ADP-dependent mitochondrial O2 flux from the RLM + CNT treated groups (CNT1-9) and V3 state-ADP-dependent mitochondrial O2 flux from the RLM + Carboxyatractyloside (CATR, a specific inhibitor of ADP-mitochondrial transport).
Predictive model based on Machine Learning and Perturbation Theory (PTML) statistics for the evaluation of mitochondrial oxygen flow modifications due to CNTs (10 random splits for each method).
| Regression Method | Statistics | Training | Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSEtr | RMSEts | ||||
| Linear Multi-regression (LM) | Mean | 0.358 | 0.0959 | 0.356 | 0.0954 |
| Min | 0.349 | 0.0954 | 0.340 | 0.0932 | |
| Max | 0.363 | 0.0966 | 0.384 | 0.0969 | |
| Neural Network (NN) | Mean | 0.645 | 0.0709 | 0.672 | 0.0681 |
| Min | 0.626 | 0.0697 | 0.620 | 0.0613 | |
| Max | 0.659 | 0.0727 | 0.739 | 0.0738 | |
| Random Forest (RF) | Mean | 0.855 | 0.0455 | 0.856 | 0.0452 |
| Min | 0.851 | 0.0451 | 0.853 | 0.0431 | |
| Max | 0.858 | 0.0462 | 0.863 | 0.0461 | |
Figure 4RF error with the number of trees for regression models.
Figure 5Regression receiver operator characteristic (RROC) curves for RF best model (test subset).
Figure 6General workflow for the machine learning analysis.