Literature DB >> 29135881

Maturity Indicators and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evaluation of the Sanders Maturity Scale.

Kevin M Neal1, Eric D Shirley2, Gary M Kiebzak1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between the Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) and Risser stages, between both systems and menarche, and whether Risser can be used to predict SMS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Predicting curve progression is critical to understanding adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and making treatment recommendations. The SMS is a better predictor of the curve acceleration phase of growth than the Risser stage. However, Scoliosis Research Society bracing criteria utilize the Risser stage and menarche.
METHODS: Consecutive female patients, 8 to 16 years old, evaluated for idiopathic scoliosis or spinal asymmetry over a 31-month period were included. Main curve size, Risser stage, menarchal status, and SMS stage were recorded for each encounter, and analyzed using Spearman rank correlation and regression models.
RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-six encounters (452 patients) were included with SMS staging, including 402 encounters that included menarchal data. The correlation between the Risser stage and the SMS stage was 0.9031 (P < 0.0001). However, ranges for the SMS at each Risser stage were large. Correlation between Risser stage and menarche was 0.7327 (P < 0.0001), and between SMS and menarche was 0.8355 (P < 0.0001). Eighty-five percent of SMS 3 patients were Risser 0, with or without open triradiate cartilages. Eighty-one percent of Risser 1 patients were SMS 4 or greater.
CONCLUSION: When assessing maturity in idiopathic scoliosis, SMS correlates strongly with Risser stages, and both SMS and Risser correlate with menarche. However, Risser stage is a poor predictor of the exact SMS stage for individual patients due to the large ranges. The majority of patients who are ≥Risser 1 have passed the curve acceleration phase of growth. Developing brace criteria based upon the SMS stage may allow more accurate predictions regarding which patients will benefit from bracing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29135881     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  The impact of residual growth on deformity progression.

Authors:  Ismat Ghanem; Maroun Rizkallah
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

Review 2.  Scoliosis and Prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stavros Oikonomidis; Arne Harland; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Classification of the growth potential and consecutive treatment consequences for spinal deformities : When does what make sense?]

Authors:  M Thielen; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Predictive value of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wengang Wang; Tailong Chen; Yibin Liu; Songsong Wang; Ningning Yang; Ming Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel Addai; Jacqueline Zarkos; Andrew James Bowey
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Sequential spine-hand radiography for assessing skeletal maturity with low radiation EOS imaging system for bracing treatment recommendation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility and validity study.

Authors:  L C M Lau; A L H Hung; W W Chau; Z Hu; A Kumar; T P Lam; W C W Chu; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Predicting curve progression for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using random forest model.

Authors:  Ausilah Alfraihat; Amer F Samdani; Sriram Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Does the Use of Sanders Staging and Distal Radius and Ulna Classification Avoid Mismatches in Growth Assessment with Risser Staging Alone?

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.