Literature DB >> 33772381

Scoliosis and Prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression.

Maximilian Lenz1, Stavros Oikonomidis2, Arne Harland2, Philipp Fürnstahl3, Mazda Farshad3, Jan Bredow2, Peer Eysel2, Max Joseph Scheyerer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic scoliosis, defined as a > 10° curvature of the spine in the frontal plane, is one of the most common spinal deformities. Age, initial curve magnitude and other parameters define whether a scoliotic deformity will progress or not. Still, their interactions and amounts of individual contribution are not fully elaborated and were the aim of this systematic review.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the common databases using MESH terms, searching for predictive factors of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ("adolescent idiopathic scoliosis" OR "ais" OR "idiopathic scoliosis") AND ("predictive factors" OR "progression" OR "curve progression" OR "prediction" OR "prognosis"). The identified and analysed factors of each study were rated to design a top five scale of the most relevant factors.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight investigations with 8255 patients were identified by literature search. Patient-specific risk factors for curve progression from initial curve were age (at diagnosis < 13 years), family history, bone mineral status (< 110 mg/cm3 in quantitative CT) and height velocity (7-8 cm/year, peak 11.6 ± 1.4 years). Relevant radiological criteria indicating curve progression included skeletal maturity, marked by Risser stages (Risser < 1) or Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS < 5), the initial extent of the Cobb angle (> 25° progression) and curve location (thoracic single or double curve). DISCUSSION: This systematic review summarised the current state of knowledge as the basis for creation of patient-specific algorithms regarding a risk calculation for a progressive scoliotic deformity. Curve magnitude is the most relevant predictive factor, followed by status of skeletal maturity and curve location.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Curve location; Curve progression; Risk factors; Skeletal maturity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772381     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06817-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Introducing levels of evidence to the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma: implementation and future directions.

Authors:  Gerard Slobogean; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Correlation Between Hump Dimensions and Curve Severity in Idiopathic Scoliosis Before and After Conservative Treatment.

Authors:  Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Carlo Perisano; Emanuele Marzetti; Amerigo Menghi; Marco Giordano; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts.

Authors:  B V Reamy; J B Slakey
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  Curve progression risk in a mixed series of braced and nonbraced patients with idiopathic scoliosis related to skeletal maturity assessment on the olecranon.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Federico Canavese; Alain Diméglio
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Jean-Pierre Daures; Vincenzo de Rosa; Alain Diméglio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Markus Rafael Konieczny; Hüsseyin Senyurt; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Predictors of spine deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andriy Noshchenko; Lilian Hoffecker; Emily M Lindley; Evalina L Burger; Christopher Mj Cain; Vikas V Patel; Andrew P Bradford
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-08-18

9.  Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Ken-Jin Tan; Maung Maung Moe; Rose Vaithinathan; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Significance of peak height velocity as a predictive factor for curve progression in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Masaaki Chazono; Takaaki Tanaka; Keishi Marumo; Katsuki Kono; Nobumasa Suzuki
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-02-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Upregulation of microRNA-96-5p is associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and low bone mass phenotype.

Authors:  Huanxiong Chen; Kenneth Guangpu Yang; Jiajun Zhang; Ka-Yee Cheuk; Evguenia Nepotchatykh; Yujia Wang; Alec Lik-Hang Hung; Tsz-Ping Lam; Alain Moreau; Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Supine correction index as a predictor for brace outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lester P K Wong; Prudence W H Cheung; Jason P Y Cheung
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 3.  A Decade in Review after Idiopathic Scoliosis Was First Called a Complex Trait-A Tribute to the Late Dr. Yves Cotrel for His Support in Studies of Etiology of Scoliosis.

Authors:  Nelson L S Tang; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett; Yong Qiu; T P Lam; Jack C Y Cheng; Nancy Hadley-Miller
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.