Literature DB >> 29135411

Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.

Leo Francisco Limberger1, Fernanda Pacheco Faria1, Luciana Silveira Campos1, Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch2, Alexandre Fornari2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings.
RESULTS: Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs and Cost Analysis ; Suburethral Slings; Urinary Incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29135411      PMCID: PMC5815540          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  14 in total

1.  [Use and sources of medicines: a population-based study in Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil].

Authors:  Karen Sarmento Costa; Priscila Maria Stolses Bergamo Francisco; Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.632

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA.

Authors:  Melissa A Laudano; Stephan Seklehner; Bilal Chughtai; Una Lee; Renuka Tyagi; Elizabeth Kavaler; Alexis E Te; Steven A Kaplan; Richard K Lee
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling populations.

Authors:  A R Herzog; N H Fultz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  M Bandarian; Z Ghanbari; A Asgari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Cost comparison of the laparoscopic burch colposuspension, laparoscopic two-team sling procedure, and the transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Katherine Lo; Violaine Marcoux; Stacey Grossman; Rose Kung; Patricia Lee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2013-03

6.  Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries, 2002-2007.

Authors:  Lisa Rogo-Gupta; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Miguel Téllez Martínez-Fornés; Cristina Fernández Pérez; Concepción Fouz López; Cristina Fernández Lucas; Jaime Borrego Hernando
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.994

8.  Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  U Ulmsten; P Petros
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995-03

9.  Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling.

Authors:  Bhumy A Davé; Camaleigh Jaber; Alix Leader-Cramer; Nicole Higgins; Margaret Mueller; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Public-private settlement and hospital mortality per sources of payment.

Authors:  Juliana Pires Machado; Mônica Martins; Iuri da Costa Leite
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.