Literature DB >> 21823854

Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

M Bandarian1, Z Ghanbari, A Asgari.   

Abstract

This study aim was to compare the efficacy of transobturator tape (TOT) as a new sling procedure, and Burch colposuspension as the gold standard surgical technique, in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This prospective randomised clinical trial was conducted on 62 women with SUI diagnosed with urodynamic test in Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients were allocated into two surgery groups, randomly; TOT and Burch (31 patients in each group). After treatment, they were followed-up for long-term outcome. The average duration of follow-up was 22 and 28 months in the TOT and Burch group, respectively. Operation duration and hospital stay in the TOT group was significantly less than the Burch group (p=0.001). The rate of complete cure, improvement and failure in the TOT group was 90.3%, 9.7% and 0%, respectively, as well as 74.2%, 19.4% and 6.5% in the Burch group. In the TOT group, 90.3% of patients were very satisfied, 6.5% moderately satisfied and 3.2% were less satisfied; none of them were unsatisfied. It is concluded that the TOT procedure is a safe and effective option with less operation time and shorter in-hospital stay for SUI treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823854     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.578776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  Intraoperative Observation of the Degree and Pattern of Urine Leakage before Adjustment of the Mesh during a Transobturator Tape Procedure.

Authors:  Jae-Joon Park; Hyung Ho Lee; Young Sig Kim
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2014-12-17

2.  Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.

Authors:  Leo Francisco Limberger; Fernanda Pacheco Faria; Luciana Silveira Campos; Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch; Alexandre Fornari
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 3.  Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.

Authors:  Debjyoti Karmakar; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Marie Carmela M Lapitan; June D Cody; Atefeh Mashayekhi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 5.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Outcome Assessment of the Marshall Coughing Test during Cervix Reposition Maneuver in Women with Urinary Stress Incontinence with/without Genital Prolapse.

Authors:  Vesna Antovska
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-02-20

Review 7.  Burch colposuspension.

Authors:  Nikolaus Veit-Rubin; Jean Dubuisson; Abigail Ford; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Sherif Mourad; Alex Digesu
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Comparison Between the Transobturator Tape Procedure and Anterior Colporrhaphy With the Kelly's Plication in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Samira Sohbati; Zohreh Salari; Nahid Eftekhari
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2015-09-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.