Literature DB >> 29134674

Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.

Esther Bär1,2, Arthur Lalonde3, Rongxiao Zhang4, Kyung-Wook Jee4, Kai Yang4, Gregory Sharp4, Bob Liu4, Gary Royle2, Hugo Bouchard3, Hsiao-Ming Lu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) for determining proton stopping power ratios (SPRs) in an experimental environment and to demonstrate its potential advantages over conventional single-energy CT (SECT) in clinical conditions.
METHODS: Water equivalent range (WER) measurements of 12 tissue-equivalent plastic materials and 12 fresh animal tissue samples are performed in a 195 MeV broad proton beam using the dose extinction method. SECT and DECT scans of the samples are performed with a dual-source CT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash). The methods of Schneider et al. (1996), Bourque et al. (2014), and Lalonde et al. (2017) are used to predict proton SPR on SECT and DECT images. From predicted SPR values, the WER of the proton beam through the sample is predicted for SECT and DECT using Monte Carlo simulations and compared to the measured WER.
RESULTS: For homogeneous tissue-equivalent plastic materials, results with DECT are consistent with experimental measurements and show a systematic reduction of SPR uncertainty compared to SECT, with root-mean-square errors of 1.59% versus 0.61% for SECT and DECT, respectively. Measurements with heterogeneous animal samples show a clear reduction of the bias on range predictions in the presence of bones, with -0.88% for SECT versus -0.58% and -0.14% for both DECT methods. An uncertainty budget allows isolating the effect of CT number conversion to SPR and predicts improvements by DECT over SECT consistently with theoretical predictions, with 0.34% and 0.31% for soft tissues and bones in the experimental setup compared to 0.34% and 1.14% with the theoretical method.
CONCLUSIONS: The present work uses experimental measurements in a realistic clinical environment to show potential benefits of DECT for proton therapy treatment planning. Our results show clear improvements over SECT in tissue-equivalent plastic materials and animal tissues. Further work towards using Monte Carlo simulations for treatment planning with DECT data and a more detailed investigation of the uncertainties on I-value and limitations on the Bragg additivity rule could potentially further enhance the benefits of this imaging technology for proton therapy.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-energy CT; proton therapy; range prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134674     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.

Authors:  Hugh H C Lee; Bin Li; Xinhui Duan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Ming Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.

Authors:  Vicki T Taasti; David C Hansen; Gregory J Michalak; Amanda J Deisher; Jon J Kruse; Ludvig P Muren; Jørgen B B Petersen; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Determination of proton stopping power ratio with dual-energy CT in 3D-printed tissue/air cavity surrogates.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Matthew M Mille; Sina Mossahebi; Haijian Chen; Paul Maggi; Huaiyu Chen-Mayer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh; Victor Rykalin; Greg DeFillippo; Mark Pankuch; Andrew W Best; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Christina Sarosiek; Reinhard W Schulte; John R Winans; Alec M Block; Courtney L Hentz; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Serdar Charyyev; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Beth Ghavidel; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Stephan Brons; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Robert P Johnson; Reinhard W Schulte; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the road ahead.

Authors:  Eric D Brooks; Matthew S Ning; Vivek Verma; X Ronald Zhu; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09

9.  Feasibility of using post-contrast dual-energy CT for pediatric radiation treatment planning and dose calculation.

Authors:  Ozgur Ates; Chia-Ho Hua; Li Zhao; Nadav Shapira; Yoad Yagil; Thomas E Merchant; Matthew Krasin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units.

Authors:  Anthony Kassaee; Chingyun Cheng; Lingshu Yin; Wei Zou; Taoran Li; Alexander Lin; Samuel Swisher-McClure; John N Lukens; Robert A Lustig; Shannon O'Reilly; Lei Dong; Roni Hytonen Ms; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.