Fangkun Zhao1,2, Ling Li1,2,3, Wenkai Zhou1,2, Dong Shi1,2, Yu Fan1,2, Liwei Ma4,5. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. 2. The Key Lens Research Laboratory of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China. 3. Beijing AIER-Intech Eye Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. lwma@cmu.edu.cn. 5. The Key Lens Research Laboratory of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China. lwma@cmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the correlation between ocular cyclotorsion induced by sitting and supine positions as well as other selected factors, validated by an image-guided system. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study conducted in 73 inpatients (85 eyes) who received intraocular operations in China Medical University. METHODS: The ocular cyclotorsion degree was recorded using an image-guided system (Verion Reference Unit, Alcon) by comparing images captured in sitting position, as well as pre- and post-different anesthesia methods in the supine position. Possible correlative factors including age, gender, eye axial length, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis, anesthesia, and comparison in laterality of eyes on ocular cyclotorsion were analyzed. RESULTS: The total cyclotorsion rate was 88.24% and the cyclotorsion degree ranged from - 14.0° to + 12.0° with an average of 4.6° ± 3.4°. Excyclotorsion was predominant OD whereas incyclotorsion was predominant OS (p < 0.05). The effect of eye axial length, BCVA, astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis, anesthesia method, age and gender on cyclotorsion orientation was not statistically significant, neither did these factors show any significant differences in the ocular cyclotorsion degree (p > 0.05). Pre- and post-anesthesia, and different anesthetic methods, did not show any significant influence on the ocular cyclotorsion degree (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cyclotorsion orientation seems to be correlated only with eye laterality. None of the other investigated factors, including age, gender, eye axial length, BCVA, astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis and anesthesia seems to affect cyclotorsion orientation or degree.
PURPOSE: To explore the correlation between ocular cyclotorsion induced by sitting and supine positions as well as other selected factors, validated by an image-guided system. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study conducted in 73 inpatients (85 eyes) who received intraocular operations in China Medical University. METHODS: The ocular cyclotorsion degree was recorded using an image-guided system (Verion Reference Unit, Alcon) by comparing images captured in sitting position, as well as pre- and post-different anesthesia methods in the supine position. Possible correlative factors including age, gender, eye axial length, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis, anesthesia, and comparison in laterality of eyes on ocular cyclotorsion were analyzed. RESULTS: The total cyclotorsion rate was 88.24% and the cyclotorsion degree ranged from - 14.0° to + 12.0° with an average of 4.6° ± 3.4°. Excyclotorsion was predominant OD whereas incyclotorsion was predominant OS (p < 0.05). The effect of eye axial length, BCVA, astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis, anesthesia method, age and gender on cyclotorsion orientation was not statistically significant, neither did these factors show any significant differences in the ocular cyclotorsion degree (p > 0.05). Pre- and post-anesthesia, and different anesthetic methods, did not show any significant influence on the ocular cyclotorsion degree (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cyclotorsion orientation seems to be correlated only with eye laterality. None of the other investigated factors, including age, gender, eye axial length, BCVA, astigmatism degree, astigmatism axis and anesthesia seems to affect cyclotorsion orientation or degree.
Authors: M Allison Roensch; Justin W Charton; Preston H Blomquist; Nalini K Aggarwal; James P McCulley Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 3.351