Literature DB >> 14967264

Maximum permissible torsional misalignment in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation.

Michael Bueeler1, Michael Mrochen, Theo Seiler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum permissible torsional misalignment in wavefront-guided refractive surgery.
SETTING: University of Zurich, Department of Ophthalmology, Zurich, Switzerland.
METHODS: The effect of torsionally misaligned ablations on the optical outcome was simulated using measured wavefront aberration patterns (2nd to 6th orders) in 130 normally aberrated eyes. The calculations were done for 3.0 mm, 5.0 mm, and 7.0 mm pupils. The optical quality of the simulated correction was rated by the root-mean-square residual wavefront error.
RESULTS: The required accuracy of torsional alignment is higher for the correction of higher-order aberrations than for cylindrical treatments only. To improve the optical performance to the level of the best 10% of a normal, untreated population, ablation would have to occur within a tolerance range of 4.0 degrees for 7.0 mm pupils.
CONCLUSIONS: The tolerance range for torisional alignment in wavefront-guided higher-order corrections depends on the amount of original optical error in each eye. Rough centration based on the surgeon's judgment may not be accurate enough to achieve significantly improved optical quality in a high percentage of treated eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14967264     DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00645-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  9 in total

1.  The future role of wavefront-guided excimer ablation.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Christoph Kühne; Jens Bühren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The effect of optical zone decentration on lower- and higher-order aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy in a cat model.

Authors:  Jens Bühren; Geunyoung Yoon; Shawn Kenner; Scott MacRae; Krystel Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  [Ablation profiles in corneal laser surgery. Current and future concepts].

Authors:  M Mrochen; F Hafezi; M Jankov; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Aspheric wavefront-guided versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser.

Authors:  Suphi Taneri; Saskia Oehler; Scott M MacRae
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Correlative factors' analysis of postural-related ocular cyclotorsion with image-guided system.

Authors:  Fangkun Zhao; Ling Li; Wenkai Zhou; Dong Shi; Yu Fan; Liwei Ma
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  [Cyclorotation of the eye in wavefront-guided LASIK using a static eyetracker with iris recognition].

Authors:  T Kohnen; C Kühne; M Cichocki; A Strenger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  One year results of presbyLASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile in correction of presbyopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Ting Zhang; Quan Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis to treat moderate-to-high astigmatism.

Authors:  Steven C Schallhorn; Jan A Venter; Stephen J Hannan; Keith A Hettinger
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-13

9.  The use of WaveLight® Contoura to create a uniform cornea: the LYRA Protocol. Part 2: the consequences of treating astigmatism on an incorrect axis via excimer laser.

Authors:  Manoj Motwani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.