Beatriz Isabel Silva Mendes1, Manuel Oliveira-Santos2,3,4, Maria João Vidigal Ferreira2,3,4. 1. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba - Celas PT, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal. mendes.bea@hotmail.com. 2. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba - Celas PT, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal. 3. Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 4. Instituto de Ciências Nucleares Aplicadas à Saúde (ICNAS), Coimbra, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 18-Fluorine sodium fluoride is a well-known radiotracer used for bone metastasis diagnosis. Its uptake correlation with cardiovascular (CV) risk was primarily suggested in oncological patients. Moreover, as a specific marker of microcalcification, it seems to correlate with CV disease progression and plaque instability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our purpose was to systematically review clinical studies that characterized the use of this marker in CV conditions. In atherosclerosis, most studies report a positive correlation with the burden of CV risk factors and vascular calcification. A higher uptake was found in culprit plaques/rupture sites in coronary and carotid arteries and it was also linked to high-risk features in histology and intravascular imaging analysis of the plaques. In aortic stenosis, this tracer displayed an increasing uptake with disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium fluoride positron emission tomography is a promising non-invasive technique to identify high-risk plaques, which sets ground to a potential use of this tracer in evaluating atherosclerotic disease progression and degenerative changes in aortic valve stenosis. Nevertheless, there is a need for further prospective evidence that demonstrates this technique's value in predicting clinical events, adjusting treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: 18-Fluorine sodium fluoride is a well-known radiotracer used for bone metastasis diagnosis. Its uptake correlation with cardiovascular (CV) risk was primarily suggested in oncological patients. Moreover, as a specific marker of microcalcification, it seems to correlate with CV disease progression and plaque instability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our purpose was to systematically review clinical studies that characterized the use of this marker in CV conditions. In atherosclerosis, most studies report a positive correlation with the burden of CV risk factors and vascular calcification. A higher uptake was found in culprit plaques/rupture sites in coronary and carotid arteries and it was also linked to high-risk features in histology and intravascular imaging analysis of the plaques. In aortic stenosis, this tracer displayed an increasing uptake with disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium fluoride positron emission tomography is a promising non-invasive technique to identify high-risk plaques, which sets ground to a potential use of this tracer in evaluating atherosclerotic disease progression and degenerative changes in aortic valve stenosis. Nevertheless, there is a need for further prospective evidence that demonstrates this technique's value in predicting clinical events, adjusting treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes.
Authors: Stephanie Marchesseau; Aruni Seneviratna; A Therese Sjöholm; Daphne Liang Qin; Jamie X M Ho; Derek J Hausenloy; David W Townsend; A Mark Richards; John J Totman; Mark Y Y Chan Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mohsen Beheshti; Babak Saboury; Nehal N Mehta; Drew A Torigian; Tom Werner; Emile Mohler; Robert Wilensky; Andrew B Newberg; Sandip Basu; Werner Langsteger; Abass Alavi Journal: Hell J Nucl Med Date: 2011 May-Aug Impact factor: 1.102
Authors: R A Hawkins; Y Choi; S C Huang; C K Hoh; M Dahlbom; C Schiepers; N Satyamurthy; J R Barrio; M E Phelps Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R Quirce; I Martínez-Rodríguez; M De Arcocha Torres; J F Jiménez-Bonilla; I Banzo; M Rebollo; M A Revilla; E Palacio; A Rubio-Vassallo; F Ortega-Nava; R Del Castillo-Matos; J M Carril Journal: Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Alex T Vesey; William S A Jenkins; Agnese Irkle; Alastair Moss; Greg Sng; Rachael O Forsythe; Tim Clark; Gemma Roberts; Alison Fletcher; Christophe Lucatelli; James H F Rudd; Anthony P Davenport; Nicholas L Mills; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Martin Dennis; William N Whiteley; Edwin J R van Beek; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: João Borges-Rosa; Manuel Oliveira-Santos; Rodolfo Silva; Nuno Pereira da Silva; Antero Abrunhosa; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Lino Gonçalves; Maria João Ferreira Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Maria I Menendez; Richard R Moore; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Chadwick L Wright; Soledad Fernandez; Rebecca D Jackson; Michael V Knopp Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-01-12