Alexandre A Barros1,2, Carlos Oliveira2,3, Ana J Ribeiro4, Riccardo Autorino5, Rui L Reis1,2, Ana Rita C Duarte6,7, Estevão Lima2,3. 1. 3B´s Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Barco, 4805-017, Guimarães, Portugal. 2. ICVS/3B's-T Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal. 3. School of Health Sciences, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. 4. University School of Vasco da Gama, Coimbra, Portugal. 5. Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 6. 3B´s Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Barco, 4805-017, Guimarães, Portugal. aduarte@dep.uminho.pt. 7. ICVS/3B's-T Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal. aduarte@dep.uminho.pt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To perform an in vivo assessment of a newly developed biodegradable ureteral stent (BUS) produced with natural-based polymers. METHODS: The BUS is based on a patented technology combining the injection process with the use of supercritical fluid technology. Study was conducted at ICVS-University of Minho (Braga, Portugal) and a total of ten domestic pigs were used. In seven animals, the experimental BUS stent was inserted, whereas in the remaining a commercially available stent was used (6-Fr Biosoft® duo stents, Porges Coloplast, Denmark). Post-stenting intravenous pyelogram was used to evaluate the degree of hydronephrosis. The in vivo stent degradation was measured as function of the weight loss. Moreover, the tensile properties of the BUS were tested during in vivo degradation. After maximum 10 days, animals were killed and necropsy was performed. Tissues were compared between the stented groups as well as between the non-stented contralateral ureters and stented ureters in each group. Biocompatibility was assessed by histopathological grading. RESULTS: In all cases, the BUS was only visible during the first 24 h on X-ray, and in all cases the BUS was completely degraded in urine after 10 days, as confirmed on necropsy. During the degradation process, the mechanical properties of the BUS decreased, while the commercial ureteral stents remained constant. At all time-points after stent insertion, the level of hydronephrosis was minimal. Overall, animals stented with BUS had an average grade of hydronephrosis which was lower compared to the controls. The BUS showed better pathological conditions, and hence better biocompatibility when compared with commercial stents. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the limitations of the present study, the in vivo testing of our novel natural origin polymer-based BUS suggests this device to feature homogeneous degradation, good urine drainage, and high biocompatibility. Next steps will be to increase its stability, and to improve the radiopacity without compromising its degradation. Ultimately, clinical studies will be required to determine the safety and feasibility of its use in humans.
PURPOSE: To perform an in vivo assessment of a newly developed biodegradable ureteral stent (BUS) produced with natural-based polymers. METHODS: The BUS is based on a patented technology combining the injection process with the use of supercritical fluid technology. Study was conducted at ICVS-University of Minho (Braga, Portugal) and a total of ten domestic pigs were used. In seven animals, the experimental BUS stent was inserted, whereas in the remaining a commercially available stent was used (6-Fr Biosoft® duo stents, Porges Coloplast, Denmark). Post-stenting intravenous pyelogram was used to evaluate the degree of hydronephrosis. The in vivo stent degradation was measured as function of the weight loss. Moreover, the tensile properties of the BUS were tested during in vivo degradation. After maximum 10 days, animals were killed and necropsy was performed. Tissues were compared between the stented groups as well as between the non-stented contralateral ureters and stented ureters in each group. Biocompatibility was assessed by histopathological grading. RESULTS: In all cases, the BUS was only visible during the first 24 h on X-ray, and in all cases the BUS was completely degraded in urine after 10 days, as confirmed on necropsy. During the degradation process, the mechanical properties of the BUS decreased, while the commercial ureteral stents remained constant. At all time-points after stent insertion, the level of hydronephrosis was minimal. Overall, animals stented with BUS had an average grade of hydronephrosis which was lower compared to the controls. The BUS showed better pathological conditions, and hence better biocompatibility when compared with commercial stents. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the limitations of the present study, the in vivo testing of our novel natural origin polymer-based BUS suggests this device to feature homogeneous degradation, good urine drainage, and high biocompatibility. Next steps will be to increase its stability, and to improve the radiopacity without compromising its degradation. Ultimately, clinical studies will be required to determine the safety and feasibility of its use in humans.
Authors: Ming Qing Zhang; Ting Zou; Yi Chen Huang; Ya Feng Shang; Gang Gang Yang; Wen Zu Wang; Jun Mei Zhou; Lu Wang; Fang Chen; Hua Xie Journal: Int J Urol Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 3.369
Authors: Chelsea N Elwood; Dirk Lange; Richard Nadeau; Shannon Seney; Kelly Summers; Ben H Chew; John D Denstedt; Peter A Cadieux Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ben H Chew; Ryan F Paterson; Kenneth W Clinkscales; Barry S Levine; Shalaby W Shalaby; Dirk Lange Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Julia E de la Cruz; María Soto; Luna Martínez-Plá; Juan Antonio Galán-Llopis; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Federico Soria Journal: Am J Clin Exp Urol Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Noor Buchholz; Alberto Budia; Julia de la Cruz; Wolfgang Kram; Owen Humphreys; Meital Reches; Raquel Valero Boix; Federico Soria Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.967
Authors: Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Tomás Fernandez; Alberto Budia; Álvaro Serrano; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2021-04
Authors: Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu; Manuel Pamplona; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Luis Resel-Folskerma; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2021-02-28 Impact factor: 2.264