Literature DB >> 22982432

In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome.

Ben H Chew1, Ryan F Paterson, Kenneth W Clinkscales, Barry S Levine, Shalaby W Shalaby, Dirk Lange.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ureteral stents are prone to irritation, encrustation and infection, and they require additional procedures for removal. Furthermore, indwelling polymer stents are often forgotten with devastating consequences to the patient. We describe the degradation time, and physiological and histological responses elicited by a novel biodegradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 female Yorkshire pigs were used in the study. Ten biodegradable Uriprene™ stents and 6 biostable Polaris™ stents were cystoscopically inserted unilaterally in 2 groups of animals. Excretory urogram, and blood and urine tests were performed on different days until day 28. Biostable stents were removed on day 21. On day 28 all pigs underwent necropsy for microscopic and histological evaluation.
RESULTS: Nine of the 10 biodegradable stents (90%) degraded completely by 4 weeks, while 1 pig had 3 fragments smaller than 1.5 cm in the bladder. Excretory urogram showed equivalent drainage and significantly less hydronephrosis in biodegradable stented kidneys. Blood and urine parameters were similar in the 2 groups. A transient increase in serum creatinine on day 7 in 40% of the pigs with a degradable stent resolved by day 10. There were significantly fewer abnormal histological findings in the degradable stent group. We evaluated drainage characteristics in an unobstructed ureter and results may not be representative of what develops in obstructed ureters.
CONCLUSIONS: The third generation biodegradable stent is a safe, effective alternative to conventional polymer stents, resulting in equivalent drainage and less hydronephrosis.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982432     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent.

Authors:  Alexandre A Barros; Carlos Oliveira; Ana J Ribeiro; Riccardo Autorino; Rui L Reis; Ana Rita C Duarte; Estevão Lima
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Behnam Nabavizadeh; Sorena Keihani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Biodegradable ureteral stents: in vitro assessment of the degradation rates of braided synthetic polymers and copolymers.

Authors:  Julia E de la Cruz; María Soto; Luna Martínez-Plá; Juan Antonio Galán-Llopis; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Federico Soria
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  Computational simulation of the flow dynamic field in a porous ureteric stent.

Authors:  Xiaohan Yang; Ali Mosayyebi; Dario Carugo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Characterization of nanostructured ureteral stent with gradient degradation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Hongli Shan; Jixue Wang; Yuchuan Hou; Jianxun Ding; Qihui Chen; Jingjing Guan; Chunxi Wang; Xuesi Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Management of forgotten ureteral stents.

Authors:  Mustafa Burak Hoşcan; Ahmet Tunçkıran
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-03-30

7.  Intelligent Optimization of the Film-to-Fiber Ratio of a Degradable Braided Bicomponent Ureteral Stent.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Liu; Feng Li; Yongsheng Ding; Ting Zou; Lu Wang; Kuangrong Hao
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.

Authors:  Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu; Manuel Pamplona; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Luis Resel-Folskerma; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Advances in ureteral stents.

Authors:  Hilary Brotherhood; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.

Authors:  Matthias Beysens; Thomas O Tailly
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.