Hao Yu Chen1,2, Line Dufresne2, Hannah Burr2, Athithan Ambikkumar2, Niko Yasui2, Kevin Luk2, Dilrini K Ranatunga3, Rachel A Whitmer3, Mark Lathrop4,5, James C Engert1,2,4, George Thanassoulis1,2. 1. Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Preventive and Genomic Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland. 4. Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5. McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are a risk factor for aortic stenosis (AS). However, a large-scale replication of associations between LPA variants and AS, their interactions with risk factors, and the effect of multiple risk alleles is not well established. Objective: To replicate the association between LPA variants with AS and identify subgroups who are at higher risk of developing AS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study of AS included 44 703 individuals (3469 cases) 55 years or older who were enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Aging cohort and who were members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care delivery system. The study leveraged the linkage of administrative health data, electronic medical records, genotypes, and self-reported questionnaire data. The 3469 AS cases were diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2015. Individuals with congential valvular heart disease were excluded. Exposures: Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the LPA locus, rs10455872 and rs3798220, that are known to associate with circulating plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and an LPA risk score. Main Outcomes and Measures: Aortic stenosis or aortic valve replacement. Results: The 44 703 participants were of European ancestry,of whom 22 019 (49.3%) were men. The mean (SD) age for the control group was 69.3 (8.3) years and the mean (SD) age for AS cases was 74.6 (8.5) years. Both LPA variants were associated with AS, with a per risk allele odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.23-1.47; P = 1.7 × 10-10) for rs10455872 and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58; P = 3.6 × 10-3) for rs3798220 after adjusting for age, age2, and sex. The results remained significant after adjusting for risk factors. The estimates were similar for an LPA risk score. Individuals with 2 risk alleles had a 2-fold or greater odds of AS compared with individuals with no risk alleles (for rs10455872, homozygous odds ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.37-3.07; P = 5.3 × 10-4; for rs3798220, homozygous odds ratio, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.03-13.62; P = .05; and for compound heterygotes, odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.17-3.44; P = .01). For rs10455872, the odds ratio for AS was greatest in individuals aged 55 to 64 years and declined with age (interaction P = .03). Each rs10455872 risk allele was also associated with AS that was diagnosed 0.71 years earlier (95% CI, -1.42 to 0; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: We provide a large-scale confirmation of the association between 2 LPA variants and AS, reaching genome-wide significance. In addition, individuals with 2 risk alleles have 2-fold or greater odds of developing AS. Age may modify these associations and identify subgroups who are at greater risk of developing AS.
Importance: Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are a risk factor for aortic stenosis (AS). However, a large-scale replication of associations between LPA variants and AS, their interactions with risk factors, and the effect of multiple risk alleles is not well established. Objective: To replicate the association between LPA variants with AS and identify subgroups who are at higher risk of developing AS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study of AS included 44 703 individuals (3469 cases) 55 years or older who were enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Aging cohort and who were members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care delivery system. The study leveraged the linkage of administrative health data, electronic medical records, genotypes, and self-reported questionnaire data. The 3469 AS cases were diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2015. Individuals with congential valvular heart disease were excluded. Exposures: Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the LPA locus, rs10455872 and rs3798220, that are known to associate with circulating plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and an LPA risk score. Main Outcomes and Measures: Aortic stenosis or aortic valve replacement. Results: The 44 703 participants were of European ancestry,of whom 22 019 (49.3%) were men. The mean (SD) age for the control group was 69.3 (8.3) years and the mean (SD) age for AS cases was 74.6 (8.5) years. Both LPA variants were associated with AS, with a per risk allele odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.23-1.47; P = 1.7 × 10-10) for rs10455872 and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58; P = 3.6 × 10-3) for rs3798220 after adjusting for age, age2, and sex. The results remained significant after adjusting for risk factors. The estimates were similar for an LPA risk score. Individuals with 2 risk alleles had a 2-fold or greater odds of AS compared with individuals with no risk alleles (for rs10455872, homozygous odds ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.37-3.07; P = 5.3 × 10-4; for rs3798220, homozygous odds ratio, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.03-13.62; P = .05; and for compound heterygotes, odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.17-3.44; P = .01). For rs10455872, the odds ratio for AS was greatest in individuals aged 55 to 64 years and declined with age (interaction P = .03). Each rs10455872 risk allele was also associated with AS that was diagnosed 0.71 years earlier (95% CI, -1.42 to 0; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: We provide a large-scale confirmation of the association between 2 LPA variants and AS, reaching genome-wide significance. In addition, individuals with 2 risk alleles have 2-fold or greater odds of developing AS. Age may modify these associations and identify subgroups who are at greater risk of developing AS.
Authors: Wensheng Lu; Yu-Ching Cheng; Keping Chen; Hong Wang; Glenn S Gerhard; Christopher D Still; Xin Chu; Rongze Yang; Ankita Parihar; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Toni I Pollin; Eduardo Angles-Cano; Michael J Quon; Braxton D Mitchell; Alan R Shuldiner; Mao Fu Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sotirios Tsimikas; Nicholas J Viney; Steven G Hughes; Walter Singleton; Mark J Graham; Brenda F Baker; Jennifer L Burkey; Qingqing Yang; Santica M Marcovina; Richard S Geary; Rosanne M Crooke; Joseph L Witztum Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Benjamin J Cairns; Sean Coffey; Ruth C Travis; Bernard Prendergast; Jane Green; James C Engert; Mark Lathrop; George Thanassoulis; Robert Clarke Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Connor A Emdin; Amit V Khera; Pradeep Natarajan; Derek Klarin; Hong-Hee Won; Gina M Peloso; Nathan O Stitziel; Akihiro Nomura; Seyedeh M Zekavat; Alexander G Bick; Namrata Gupta; Rosanna Asselta; Stefano Duga; Piera Angelica Merlini; Adolfo Correa; Thorsten Kessler; James G Wilson; Matthew J Bown; Alistair S Hall; Peter S Braund; Nilesh J Samani; Heribert Schunkert; Jaume Marrugat; Roberto Elosua; Ruth McPherson; Martin Farrall; Hugh Watkins; Cristen Willer; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Janine F Felix; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric Lander; Daniel J Rader; John Danesh; Diego Ardissino; Stacey Gabriel; Danish Saleheen; Sekar Kathiresan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: J C Hopewell; U Seedorf; M Farrall; S Parish; T Kyriakou; A Goel; A Hamsten; R Collins; H Watkins; R Clarke Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Nicolas Perrot; Sébastien Thériault; Christian Dina; Hao Yu Chen; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Sidwell Rigade; Audrey-Anne Després; Anthony Poulin; Romain Capoulade; Thierry Le Tourneau; David Messika-Zeitoun; Mikaël Trottier; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Maxime Nadeau; James C Engert; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Marc R Dweck; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Jacques Schott; George Thanassoulis; Marie-Annick Clavel; Yohan Bossé; Benoit J Arsenault Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael P Cavalcanti; Álvaro M Perazzo; Rafael A F Gomes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Konstantin Zhigalov; Alexander Weymann; Arjang Ruhparwar; Ricardo Carvalho Lima Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Teresa Trenkwalder; Christopher P Nelson; Muntaser D Musameh; Ify R Mordi; Thorsten Kessler; Costanza Pellegrini; Radoslaw Debiec; Tobias Rheude; Viktor Lazovic; Lingyao Zeng; Andreas Martinsson; J Gustav Smith; Jesper R Gådin; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Per Eriksson; Jonas B Nielsen; Sarah E Graham; Cristen J Willer; Kristian Hveem; Adnan Kastrati; Peter S Braund; Colin N A Palmer; Amparo Aracil; Oliver Husser; Wolfgang Koenig; Heribert Schunkert; Chim C Lang; Christian Hengstenberg; Nilesh J Samani Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Audrey-Anne Després; Nicolas Perrot; Anthony Poulin; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; Hao Yu Chen; Raphaëlle Bourgeois; Mikaël Trottier; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Maxime Nadeau; James C Engert; Sébastien Thériault; Yohan Bossé; Joseph L Witztum; Patrick Couture; Patrick Mathieu; Marc R Dweck; Sotirios Tsimikas; George Thanassoulis; Philippe Pibarot; Marie-Annick Clavel; Benoit J Arsenault Journal: CJC Open Date: 2019-04-12