Romain Capoulade1,2, Calvin Yeang3, Kwan L Chan4, Philippe Pibarot1, Sotirios Tsimikas3. 1. Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada. 2. L'institut du thorax, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, University of Nantes, Nantes, France. 3. Vascular Medicine Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 4. Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Several studies have reported an association of levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and the content of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB) and apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo[a]) with faster calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) progression. However, whether this association is threshold or linear remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether the plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) have a linear association with a faster rate of CAVS progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial tested the association of baseline plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) with the rate of CAVS progression. Participants were included from the ASTRONOMER (Effects of Rosuvastatin on Aortic Stenosis Progression) trial, a multicenter study conducted in 23 Canadian sites designed to test the effect of statin therapy (median follow-up, 3.5 years [interquartile range, 2.9-4.5 years]). Patients with mild to moderate CAVS defined by peak aortic jet velocity ranging from 2.5 to 4.0 m/s were recruited; those with peak aortic jet velocity of less than 2.5 m/s or with an indication for statin therapy were excluded. Data were collected from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005, and underwent ad hoc analysis from April 1 through September 1, 2018. Interventions: After the randomization process, patients were followed up by means of echocardiography for 3 to 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression rate of CAVS as assessed by annualized progression of peak aortic jet velocity. Results: In this cohort of 220 patients (60.0% male; mean [SD] age, 58 [13] years), a linear association was found between plasma levels of Lp(a) (odds ratio [OR] per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .006), OxPL-apoB (OR per 1-nM increase, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .02), and OxPL-apo(a) (OR per 10-nM increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .002) and faster CAVS progression, which is marked in younger patients (OR for Lp[a] level per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.07-1.33; P = .002]; OR for OxPL-apoB level per 1-nM increase, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .01]; and OR for OxPL-apo[a] level per 10-nM increase, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .001]) and remained statistically significant after comprehensive multivariable adjustment (β coefficient, ≥ 0.25; SE, ≤ 0.004 [P ≤ .005]; OR, ≥1.10 [P ≤ .007]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates that the association of Lp(a) levels and its content in OxPL with faster CAVS progression is linear, reinforcing the concept that Lp(a) levels should be measured in patients with mild to moderate CAVS to enhance management and risk stratification. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800800.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Several studies have reported an association of levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and the content of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB) and apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo[a]) with faster calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) progression. However, whether this association is threshold or linear remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether the plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) have a linear association with a faster rate of CAVS progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial tested the association of baseline plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) with the rate of CAVS progression. Participants were included from the ASTRONOMER (Effects of Rosuvastatin on Aortic Stenosis Progression) trial, a multicenter study conducted in 23 Canadian sites designed to test the effect of statin therapy (median follow-up, 3.5 years [interquartile range, 2.9-4.5 years]). Patients with mild to moderate CAVS defined by peak aortic jet velocity ranging from 2.5 to 4.0 m/s were recruited; those with peak aortic jet velocity of less than 2.5 m/s or with an indication for statin therapy were excluded. Data were collected from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005, and underwent ad hoc analysis from April 1 through September 1, 2018. Interventions: After the randomization process, patients were followed up by means of echocardiography for 3 to 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression rate of CAVS as assessed by annualized progression of peak aortic jet velocity. Results: In this cohort of 220 patients (60.0% male; mean [SD] age, 58 [13] years), a linear association was found between plasma levels of Lp(a) (odds ratio [OR] per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .006), OxPL-apoB (OR per 1-nM increase, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .02), and OxPL-apo(a) (OR per 10-nM increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .002) and faster CAVS progression, which is marked in younger patients (OR for Lp[a] level per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.07-1.33; P = .002]; OR for OxPL-apoB level per 1-nM increase, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .01]; and OR for OxPL-apo[a] level per 10-nM increase, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .001]) and remained statistically significant after comprehensive multivariable adjustment (β coefficient, ≥ 0.25; SE, ≤ 0.004 [P ≤ .005]; OR, ≥1.10 [P ≤ .007]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates that the association of Lp(a) levels and its content in OxPL with faster CAVS progression is linear, reinforcing the concept that Lp(a) levels should be measured in patients with mild to moderate CAVS to enhance management and risk stratification. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800800.
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gregor Leibundgut; Corey Scipione; Huiyong Yin; Matthias Schneider; Michael B Boffa; Simone Green; Xiaohong Yang; Edward Dennis; Joseph L Witztum; Marlys L Koschinsky; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Romain Capoulade; Marie-Annick Clavel; Jean G Dumesnil; Kwan L Chan; Koon K Teo; James W Tam; Nancy Côté; Patrick Mathieu; Jean-Pierre Després; Philippe Pibarot Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nicholas J Viney; Julian C van Capelleveen; Richard S Geary; Shuting Xia; Joseph A Tami; Rosie Z Yu; Santica M Marcovina; Steven G Hughes; Mark J Graham; Rosanne M Crooke; Stanley T Crooke; Joseph L Witztum; Erik S Stroes; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Romain Capoulade; Kwan L Chan; Calvin Yeang; Patrick Mathieu; Yohan Bossé; Jean G Dumesnil; James W Tam; Koon K Teo; Ablajan Mahmut; Xiaohong Yang; Joseph L Witztum; Benoit J Arsenault; Jean-Pierre Després; Philippe Pibarot; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Benjamin J Cairns; Sean Coffey; Ruth C Travis; Bernard Prendergast; Jane Green; James C Engert; Mark Lathrop; George Thanassoulis; Robert Clarke Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Xuchu Que; Ming-Yow Hung; Calvin Yeang; Ayelet Gonen; Thomas A Prohaska; Xiaoli Sun; Cody Diehl; Antti Määttä; Dalia E Gaddis; Karen Bowden; Jennifer Pattison; Jeffrey G MacDonald; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Pamela L Mellon; Catherine C Hedrick; Klaus Ley; Yury I Miller; Christopher K Glass; Kirk L Peterson; Christoph J Binder; Sotirios Tsimikas; Joseph L Witztum Journal: Nature Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Evangelos Tzolos; Jacek Kwiecinski; Daniel Berman; Piotr Slomka; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nishant P Shah; Neha J Pajidipati; Robert W McGarrah; Ann Marie Navar; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Michael A Blazing; Svati H Shah; Adrian F Hernandez; Manesh R Patel Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 2.778