Literature DB >> 29126594

Seeing the forest beyond the trees: Predicting survival in burn patients with machine learning.

Adrienne N Cobb1, Witawat Daungjaiboon2, Sarah A Brownlee3, Anthony J Baldea4, Arthur P Sanford5, Michael M Mosier6, Paul C Kuo7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify predictors of survival for burn patients at the patient and hospital level using machine learning techniques.
METHODS: The HCUP SID for California, Florida and New York were used to identify patients admitted with a burn diagnosis and merged with hospital data from the AHA Annual Survey. Random forest and stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) were used to identify predictors of survival at the patient and hospital level from the top performing model.
RESULTS: We analyzed 31,350 patients from 670 hospitals. SGB (AUC 0.93) and random forest (AUC 0.82) best identified patient factors such as age and absence of renal failure (p < 0.001) and hospital factors such as full time residents (p < 0.001) and nurses (p = 0.004) to be associated with increased survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and hospital factors are predictive of survival in burn patients. It is difficult to control patient factors, but hospital factors can inform decisions about where burn patients should be treated.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Machine learning; Outcomes; Random forest; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29126594      PMCID: PMC5837911          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  19 in total

1.  Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the baux score.

Authors:  Turner Osler; Laurent G Glance; David W Hosmer
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-03

2.  Delivery system characteristics and their association with quality and costs of care: implications for accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Askar Chukmaitov; David W Harless; Gloria J Bazzoli; Henry J Carretta; Umaporn Siangphoe
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  Electronic health record use, intensity of hospital care, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Saul Blecker; Keith Goldfeld; Naeun Park; Daniel Shine; Jonathan S Austrian; R Scott Braithwaite; Martha J Radford; Marc N Gourevitch
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Frailty score on admission predicts outcomes in elderly burn injury.

Authors:  Kathleen S Romanowski; Alura Barsun; Tina L Pamlieri; David G Greenhalgh; Soman Sen
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Atul A Gawande; Marcus E Semel; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Michael J Zinner; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Predicting survival in thermal injury: a systematic review of methodology of composite prediction models.

Authors:  Amer Hussain; Fouzia Choukairi; Ken Dunn
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  Role of artificial neural networks in prediction of survival of burn patients-a new approach.

Authors:  Hamid Karimi Estahbanati; Nosratollah Bouduhi
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  William J Kostis; Kitaw Demissie; Stephen W Marcella; Yu-Hsuan Shao; Alan C Wilson; Abel E Moreyra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Don't get sick on the weekend: an evaluation of the weekend effect on mortality for patients visiting US EDs.

Authors:  Adam L Sharp; Hwajung Choi; Rod A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Variation in cancer surgical outcomes associated with physician and nurse staffing: a retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Hideki Hashimoto; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.

Authors:  Xinsong Du; Jae Min; Chintan P Shah; Rohit Bishnoi; William R Hogan; Dominick J Lemas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Serra E Moura; Kavit Amin; Chidi Ekwobi
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-08-19

3.  Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Park; Yongwon Cho; Donghyeok Shin; Seong-Soo Choi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Routine Hematological Parameters May Be Predictors of COVID-19 Severity.

Authors:  Paulina B Szklanna; Haidar Altaie; Shane P Comer; Sarah Cullivan; Sarah Kelliher; Luisa Weiss; John Curran; Emmet Dowling; Katherine M A O'Reilly; Aoife G Cotter; Brian Marsh; Sean Gaine; Nick Power; Áine Lennon; Brian McCullagh; Fionnuala Ní Áinle; Barry Kevane; Patricia B Maguire
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-16

5.  Machine Learning Demonstrates High Accuracy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Angelos Mantelakis; Yannis Assael; Parviz Sorooshian; Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 6.  Nutrition in times of Covid-19, how to trust the deluge of scientific information.

Authors:  Maria Isabel T D Correia
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.620

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.