Adam L Sharp1, Hwajung Choi, Rod A Hayward. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA. adam.sharpy@gmail.com
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study is to determine if the mortality for adult patients visiting US emergency departments (EDs) is greater on weekends than weekdays. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: The secondary objective of the study is to examine whether patient factors (diagnosis, income, insurance status) or hospital characteristics (ownership, ED volume, teaching status) are associated with increased weekend mortality. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort analysis of the 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Evaluating 4225973 adults admitted through the ED to the hospital, signifying a 20% representative sample of US ED admissions. Logistic regression was used to examine associations of weekend mortality with patient and hospital characteristics, accounting for clustering by hospital. RESULTS: Emergency department patients admitted to the hospital on the weekend are significantly more likely to die than those admitted on weekdays (odds ratio, 1.073; 95% confidence interval, 1.061-1.084). A significant weekend effect persisted after controlling for patient characteristics (odds ratio, 1.026; 95% confidence interval, 1.005-1.048). The top 10 primary diagnoses for patients dying did not identify any specific medical condition that explained the higher weekend admission mortality. The weekend effect was also relatively consistent across patient income, insurance status, hospital ownership, ED volume, and hospital teaching status. CONCLUSION: Patients are more likely to die when admitted through the ED on the weekend. We were unable to identify specific circumstances or hospital attributes that help explain this phenomenon. Although the relative increased risk per case is small, our study demonstrates a significant number of potentially preventable weekend deaths occurring annually in the United States.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study is to determine if the mortality for adult patients visiting US emergency departments (EDs) is greater on weekends than weekdays. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: The secondary objective of the study is to examine whether patient factors (diagnosis, income, insurance status) or hospital characteristics (ownership, ED volume, teaching status) are associated with increased weekend mortality. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort analysis of the 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Evaluating 4225973 adults admitted through the ED to the hospital, signifying a 20% representative sample of US ED admissions. Logistic regression was used to examine associations of weekend mortality with patient and hospital characteristics, accounting for clustering by hospital. RESULTS: Emergency department patients admitted to the hospital on the weekend are significantly more likely to die than those admitted on weekdays (odds ratio, 1.073; 95% confidence interval, 1.061-1.084). A significant weekend effect persisted after controlling for patient characteristics (odds ratio, 1.026; 95% confidence interval, 1.005-1.048). The top 10 primary diagnoses for patients dying did not identify any specific medical condition that explained the higher weekend admission mortality. The weekend effect was also relatively consistent across patient income, insurance status, hospital ownership, ED volume, and hospital teaching status. CONCLUSION:Patients are more likely to die when admitted through the ED on the weekend. We were unable to identify specific circumstances or hospital attributes that help explain this phenomenon. Although the relative increased risk per case is small, our study demonstrates a significant number of potentially preventable weekend deaths occurring annually in the United States.
Authors: Adrienne N Cobb; Witawat Daungjaiboon; Sarah A Brownlee; Anthony J Baldea; Arthur P Sanford; Michael M Mosier; Paul C Kuo Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Sara G Murray; Gabriela Schmajuk; Laura Trupin; Erica Lawson; Matthew Cascino; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Patricia P Katz; Edward H Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Anai N Kothari; Matthew A C Zapf; Robert H Blackwell; Talar Markossian; Victor Chang; Zhiyong Mi; Gopal N Gupta; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert H Blackwell; Gregory J Barton; Anai N Kothari; Matthew A C Zapf; Robert C Flanigan; Paul C Kuo; Gopal N Gupta Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Frank J Attenello; Timothy Wen; Steven Y Cen; Alvin Ng; May Kim-Tenser; Nerses Sanossian; Arun P Amar; William J Mack Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-04-15
Authors: Betina Vest-Hansen; Anders Hammerich Riis; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: James T P Campbell; Benjamin D Bray; Alex M Hoffman; Sara J Kavanagh; Anthony G Rudd; Pippa J Tyrrell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240