Chen Yang1,2, Yasutaka Tashiro1, Andrew Lynch3, Freddie Fu1, William Anderst4. 1. Biodynamics Lab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Biodynamics Lab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. anderst@pitt.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the in vivo kinematics and arthrokinematics of chronic ACL-deficient (ACL-D) and unaffected contralateral knees during level walking and downhill running using dynamic biplane radiography. It was hypothesized that ACL-D knees would demonstrate increased anterior translation and internal rotation, and that ACL-deficiency would alter the tibiofemoral contact paths in comparison to the unaffected contralateral side. METHODS: Eight participants with unilateral chronic ACL-D without instability symptoms were recruited. The contralateral unaffected knee was considered as control. Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades were determined from ACL-D and unaffected knees. Dynamic knee motion was determined from footstrike through the early-stance phase (20-25% of gait cycle) using a validated volumetric model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific CT bone models to dynamic biplane radiographs. Participants performed level walking at 1.2 m/s and downhill running at 2.5 m/s while biplane radiographs were collected at 100 and 150 images per second, respectively. Tibiofemoral kinematics and arthrokinematics (the path of the closest contact point between articulating subchondral bone surfaces) were determined and compared between ACL-D and unaffected knees. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to identify differences between ACL-D and unaffected knees at 5% increments of the gait cycle. RESULTS: Anterior-posterior translations were significantly larger in ACL-D than unaffected knees during level walking (all p < 0.001) and downhill running (all p ≤ 0.022). Internal rotation showed no significant difference between ACL-D and unaffected knees during level walking and downhill running. Closest contact points on the femur in ACL-D knees were consistently more anterior in the lateral compartment during downhill running (significant from 10 to 20% of the gait cycle, all p ≤ 0.044), but not during level walking. No differences in medial compartment contact paths were identified. Half of the participants had asymmetric K-L grades, with all having worse knee OA in the involved knee. Only 2 relatively young individuals had not progressed beyond stage 1 in either knee. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that anterior translation and knee joint contact paths are altered in ACL-D knees even in the absence of instability symptoms. The clinical relevance is that ACL-D patients who do not report symptoms of instability likely still demonstrate altered knee kinematics and arthrokinematics compared to their uninvolved limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.
PURPOSE: To analyze the in vivo kinematics and arthrokinematics of chronic ACL-deficient (ACL-D) and unaffected contralateral knees during level walking and downhill running using dynamic biplane radiography. It was hypothesized that ACL-D knees would demonstrate increased anterior translation and internal rotation, and that ACL-deficiency would alter the tibiofemoral contact paths in comparison to the unaffected contralateral side. METHODS: Eight participants with unilateral chronic ACL-D without instability symptoms were recruited. The contralateral unaffected knee was considered as control. Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades were determined from ACL-D and unaffected knees. Dynamic knee motion was determined from footstrike through the early-stance phase (20-25% of gait cycle) using a validated volumetric model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific CT bone models to dynamic biplane radiographs. Participants performed level walking at 1.2 m/s and downhill running at 2.5 m/s while biplane radiographs were collected at 100 and 150 images per second, respectively. Tibiofemoral kinematics and arthrokinematics (the path of the closest contact point between articulating subchondral bone surfaces) were determined and compared between ACL-D and unaffected knees. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to identify differences between ACL-D and unaffected knees at 5% increments of the gait cycle. RESULTS: Anterior-posterior translations were significantly larger in ACL-D than unaffected knees during level walking (all p < 0.001) and downhill running (all p ≤ 0.022). Internal rotation showed no significant difference between ACL-D and unaffected knees during level walking and downhill running. Closest contact points on the femur in ACL-D knees were consistently more anterior in the lateral compartment during downhill running (significant from 10 to 20% of the gait cycle, all p ≤ 0.044), but not during level walking. No differences in medial compartment contact paths were identified. Half of the participants had asymmetric K-L grades, with all having worse knee OA in the involved knee. Only 2 relatively young individuals had not progressed beyond stage 1 in either knee. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that anterior translation and knee joint contact paths are altered in ACL-D knees even in the absence of instability symptoms. The clinical relevance is that ACL-D patients who do not report symptoms of instability likely still demonstrate altered knee kinematics and arthrokinematics compared to their uninvolved limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament; Arthrokinematics; Biplane radiography; In vivo; Kinematics
Authors: Louis E Defrate; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Jeremy M Moses; Neil P Pathare; Guoan Li Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Volker Musahl; Ehab M Nazzal; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Rafael Serrano; Jonathan D Hughes; Fabrizio Margheritini; Stefano Zaffagnini; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Elizabeth Wellsandt; Ashutosh Khandha; Jacob Capin; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Stefano Di Paolo; Piero Agostinone; Alberto Grassi; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Erika Pinelli; Marco Bontempi; Gregorio Marchiori; Laura Bragonzoni; Stefano Zaffagnini Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-07-15