| Literature DB >> 29124045 |
Seyed Mostafa Nachvak1, Hadi Abdollahzad1, Roghayeh Mostafai2, Shima Moradi2, Yahya Pasdar1, Mansour Rezaei3, Soudabeh Esksndari4.
Abstract
Dietary diversity score (DDS) is known as an indicator of food quality. Dietary diversity can promote health status. The aim of this study was determined DDS and its related factors in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (KUMS) employees. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 190 employees of KUMS in 2015. According to the population of KUMS centers which were selected randomly (Paramedical, Public Health faculties, Imam Reza Hospital and province health center), subjects were selected by convenience sampling method. Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to calculate DDS. Foods were divided into 5 main groups: grains, vegetables, fruits, meat, and dairy products. The main groups had 23 subgroups. Total DDS divided to 4 quartiles: less than 3.0, 3.0-5.5, 5.6-8.5, and more than 8.5. Anthropometric parameters including: weight, height, waist circumference (WC), and hip circumference were measured. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, χ2 test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with SPSS 20 software (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean ± standard deviation of DDS and body mass index (BMI) were 5.68 ± 1.73 and 25.1 ± 3.42 kg/m2, respectively. The average of the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in men and women was 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.86 ± 0.06, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between DDS and self-reported economic status (p < 0.022). No significant difference was observed between DDS and BMI or WC. However, significant negative correlation was observed between DDS and WHR in men (p < 0.019). This study showed that DDS had a negative correlation with the WHR. Therefore, dietary diversity may improve health status by effect on fat distribution in body.Entities:
Keywords: Food quality; Waist circumference; Waist to hip ratio
Year: 2017 PMID: 29124045 PMCID: PMC5665746 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2017.6.4.247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nutr Res ISSN: 2287-3732
Differences of DDS in SES of KUMS employees
| Characteristics | Category | No. (%) | Mean of DDS | p* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 85 (44.7) | 5.62 ± 1.82 | 0.375 |
| Female | 105 (55.3) | 5.69 ± 1.62 | ||
| Marital status | Married | 57 (30.2) | 5.33 ± 1.51 | 0.805 |
| Single | 128 (67.7) | 6.11 ± 1.73 | ||
| Separated/widow | 4 (2.1) | 5.98 ± 1.71 | ||
| Self-reported of economic status | Good | 29 (15.5) | 5.47 ± 1.72 | 0.022 |
| Medium | 139 (74.3) | 5.79 ± 1.74 | ||
| Weak | 19 (10.2) | 4.90 ± 1.42 | ||
| Educational level | Less than diploma and diploma | 34 (17.9) | 5.31 ± 2.4 | 0.123 |
| Associate degree and bachelor | 124 (65.3) | 5.76 ± 1.54 | ||
| Master and PhD | 31 (16.3) | 5.62 ± 1.45 |
DDS, dietary diversity score; SES, socioeconomic status; KUMS, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
*p value was calculated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis test.
Differences of consumed food servings among quartiles of DDS in KUMS employees
| Food group (serving/day) | Quartiles of DDS | p* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (< 3.0) | Q2 (3.0–5.5) | Q3 (5.6–8.5) | Q4 (> 8.5) | ||
| No. of employees | 8 | 79 | 91 | 12 | - |
| Grains | 0.18 ± 0.27 | 1.51 ± 0.84 | 1.57 ± 0.97 | 1.76 ± 1.08 | 0.001 |
| Vegetables | 2.37 ± 2.48 | 3.22 ± 2.02 | 3.89 ± 2.32 | 4.95 ± 3.62 | 0.006 |
| Fruits | 2.72 ± 4.24 | 2.14 ± 1.39 | 3.28 ± 2.69 | 6.78 ± 3.98 | 0.001 |
| Meat and cereals | 0.12 ± 0.35 | 1.10 ± 0.55 | 1.44 ± 0.90 | 1.72 ± 0.75 | 0.001 |
| Dairy product | 0.01 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.76 | 1.40 ± 0.96 | 2.07 ± 1.11 | 0.001 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
DDS, dietary diversity score; KUMS, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
*p value was calculated using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 1BMI and quartiles of DDS in KUMS employees.
BMI, body mass index; DDS, dietary diversity score; KUMS, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
Differences of anthropometric parameters among quartiles of DDS in KUMS employees
| Anthropometric parameters | Sex | Quartiles of DDS | p* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (< 3.0) | Q2 (3.0–5.5) | Q3 (5.6–8.5) | Q4 (> 8.5) | |||
| Height (cm) | Male (85) | 179.00 ± 8.08 | 174.76 ± 7.89 | 176.95 ± 6.50 | 180.67 ± 4.96 | 0.191 |
| Female (105) | 164.00 ± 8.28 | 162.31 ± 5.73 | 162.69 ± 5.07 | 161.00 ± 7.77 | 0.860 | |
| Weight (kg) | Male (85) | 87.65 ± 21.21 | 79.65 ± 10.19 | 82.48 ± 11.80 | 90.80 ± 4.30 | 0.106 |
| Female (105) | 66.30 ± 7.10 | 63.26 ± 8.89 | 63.90 ± 9.44 | 60.84 ± 6.00 | 0.815 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | Male (85) | 27.12 ± 4.82 | 26.02 ± 2.42 | 26.28 ± 3.22 | 27.83 ± 1.37 | 0.506 |
| Female (105) | 24.70 ± 2.64 | 24.04 ± 3.33 | 24.19 ± 3.83 | 23.54 ± 2.72 | 0.963 | |
| WC (cm) | Male (85) | 95.75 ± 3.86 | 96.16 ± 8.20 | 95.50 ± 8.12 | 90.16 ± 11.05 | 0.439 |
| Female (105) | 78.00 ± 10.86 | 83.53 ± 9.60 | 86.55 ± 11.55 | 89.60 ± 7.30 | 0.214 | |
| HC (cm) | Male (85) | 103.75 ± 1.25 | 104.29 ± 8.33 | 102.68 ± 7.00 | 104.66 ± 7.17 | 0.800 |
| Female (105) | 93.50 ± 7.85 | 98.04 ± 9.00 | 99.37 ± 10.18 | 99.80 ± 5.26 | 0.634 | |
| WHR | Male (85) | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.019 |
| Female (105) | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.12 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.770 | |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
DDS, dietary diversity score; KUMS, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.
*p value was calculated using analysis of variance.