| Literature DB >> 29123122 |
Roshni Bhudia1, Amar Ahmad2, Onyinye Akpenyi1, Angela Whiley1, Mark Wilks3, Tim Oliver4.
Abstract
The microaerophylic organism Propionibacterium acnes has shown consistent association with prostate cancer (PC). Studies linking circumcision with reduced PC further support anaerobes involvement as circumcision reduces anaerobe colonisation on the glans penis. A 1988 study linked anaerobes with PC but considered them as opportunists in necrotic tumour. A hypothesis that a "Helicobacter-like" process causes PC justified this pilot study. Active surveillance patients were enrolled. Post-prostate massage urine samples were screened using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) technique for bacterial identification after culture in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. 8 out of 18 patients (41%) had either obligate anaerobic (n = 5) or microaerophilic (n = 4, one of whom also had anaerobes) organisms identified. None of 10 control samples contained obligate anaerobes. Although mean PSA was 63% higher in those with low oxygen tolerating bacteria, two high outliers resulted in this difference being non-significant. Given the substantially higher proportion of PC patients with organisms growing in a low concentration of oxygen when combined with previous studies compared to controls, the degree of significance was as high as smoking 5-9 cigarettes a day and needs further investigation. Translational research in trials combining Vitamin D and aspirin have begun as part of such investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29123122 PMCID: PMC5680220 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13782-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical characteristics of prostate cancer patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 ML | 58 | 1.29 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 02 PH | 57 | 4.54 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 03 PO | 60 | 7.3 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 04 HS | 72 | 6.1 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 05 FJD | 63 | 5.08 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 06 PK | 74 | 10.7 | T3a, N0, M0 | G 3 + 4 |
| 07 PW | 69 | 3.22 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 08 JL | 69 | 12 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 4 |
| 09 CO | 55 | 6.7 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 4 |
| 10 SP | 66 | 12 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 11 AH | 69 | 11 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 12 ST | 62 | 26 | T2, N0, M0 | G 4 + 5 |
| 13 PL | 61 | 7.4 | T3a, N0, M0 | G 4 + 3 |
| 14 AB | 75 | 9.52 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 4 |
| 15 AO | 52 | 4.84 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 16 WP | 85 | 26 | T2, N0, M0 | G 3 + 4 |
| 17 SR | 65 | 5.36 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
| 18 KP | 69 | 7.5 | T1, N0, M0 | G 3 + 3 |
Control “normal” males.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 01 MA | 85 | Under investigation |
| 02 OSt-L | 77 | Pre-op |
| 03 EC | 81 | Routine blood |
| 04 MC | 80 | Pre-op |
| 05 RP | 77 | Respiratory arrest |
| 06 MLu | 70 | Post op |
| 07 BM | 87 | Under investigation |
| 08 RS | 76 | A&E attendance |
| 09 GA | 65 | ITU |
| 10 KD | 72 | Cardiac arrest |
Oxygen dependence of organisms detected after prostate massage in study patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 ML | 6/8/15 | Corynebacterium amycolatum Staph haemolyticus | Nil | Nil |
| 02 PH | 6/8/15 | Strep sp, Staph haemolyticus & C. glucuronydictum | Peptoniphilus harei Veillonella montpenellerensis | Nil |
| 03 PO | 10/8/15 | Strep sp, Staph hominis & Dermabacter hominis | Nil | Actinomyces neuii |
| 04 HS | 11/8/15 | Aerococcus urinae, staph epidermidis, Staph simulans Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum | Fusobacterium nucleatum Fusobacterium gondiaformans Peptoniphilus harei Actinobaculum schaali?i | Nil |
| 05 FJD | 27/8/15 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| 06 PK | 27/8/15 | Enterococcus faecalis | Nil | Nil |
| 07 PW | 3/9/15 | Staph epidermidis & Staph haemolyticus | Nil | Nil |
| 08 JL | 27/8/15 | Enterococcus faecalis, Staph epiderm & Micrococcus luteus | Nil | Brevibacterium casei |
| 09 CO | 10/9/15 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| 10 SP | 10/9/15 | Strep agalactiae, Gardnerella sp Strep pneumoniae, Strep anginosus | Nil |
|
| 11 AH | 10/9/15 | Staph epiderm, Staph hominis Dermabacter hominis C. tuberculostearicum | Nil | Nil |
| 12 ST | 10/9/15 | Staph capitis, Staph hominis Strep anginosus Acinetobacter radioresistens | Peptoniphilus harei | Nil |
| 13 PL | 10/9/15 | C. tuberculostearicum Strep agalactiae, Strep angino Dermobacter hominis | Veillonella parvula Actinobaculum schaalii | Actinomyces turicencis Brevibacterium paucvorans |
| 14 AB | 17/9/15 | Staph epiderm, | Nil | Nil |
| 15 AO | 17/9/15 | Staph hominis Staph haemolyticus Strep anginosus | Nil | Nil |
| 16 WP | 17/9/15 | C. amycolatum Strep anginosus Dermobacter hominis Staph epidermis | Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Peptoniphilus harei Finegoldia magna | Nil |
| 17 SR | 17/9/15 | Aerococcus urinae, E. faecalis Staph haem, Staph hominis, M luteus, Strep pneuminiae Kocuria rhizophilia | Nil | Actinomyces neuii |
| 18 PK | 17/9/15 | Staph epidermidis, Staph capitis, Staph haemolyticus E. faecalis | Nil | Nil |
Figure 1Shows a dot plot distribution of PSA in 18 Active Surveillance patients comparing combined group of obligate anaerobe & microaerophilic positive patients and those without such bacteria.
Summary reports of anaerobes in normal urines & tissue from patients with BPH vs with prostate cancer.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Urine[ | 517 | 5.9% |
| BPH tissue #[ | 24 | 0% |
| Control “normal” urines (Bhudia | 10 | 0% |
| Prostate Cancer tissue ##[ | 9 | 67% # vs ## P = 0.001 Fishers exact test |
| Prostate Cancer urines (Bhudia | 18 | 44% |
| TOTAL “CONTROLS” | 551 | 5.5% |
| TOTAL PROSTATE CANCER | 27 | 52% Pearson's χ² = 70.3 (df = 1, p < 2.2e-16) with Yates' continuity correction |
Comparison of anaerobes and prostate/cervix ca risk and imprecise measures of sun exposure vs more precise lung ca risk of low dose tobacco.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic study of PC risk low vs high sun exposure[ | 8 | 1.36 (range 1.01–1.73) |
| Clinical Questionnaire PC risk low vs high sun exposure[ | 8 | 1.13 (range 1.0–1.41) |
| Bacterial vaginosis & Ca Cervix[ | 19 | 1.51 (1.24–1.83) |
| HPV, BV and abnormal cytology vs BV alone vs BV absent[ | 1 | 3.82 vs 2.91 vs 1.00 |
| 10 yr cancer mortality post a psychiatric sick note vs no note in civil service[ | 1 | 2.49 (1.33 to 4.68) |
| Male death Lung cancer from smoking 1–4 cigarettes a day[ | 1 | 2.79 ((0.94 to 8.28) |
| Presence of anaerobes in prostate & PC risk see Table | 1 | Odds ratio* (95% C.I.) = 17.8 (7. 6, 42.0); p-value= 3.88e-10 * Odds ratio was computed by median-unbiased estimation (exact CI). |
| Male death Lung cancer from smoking 5–9 cigarettes a day[ | 1 | 11.1 (6.94–20.44) |