| Literature DB >> 28128333 |
Christopher Corbinais1,2,3, Aurélie Mathieu1, Prashant P Damke1,2,3, Thierry Kortulewski1,2,3, Didier Busso1,2,3, Mariano Prado-Acosta1, J Pablo Radicella1,2,3, Stéphanie Marsin1,2,3.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori chronically colonises half of the world's human population and is the main cause of ulcers and gastric cancers. Its prevalence and the increase in antibiotic resistance observed recently reflect the high genetic adaptability of this pathogen. Together with high mutation rates and an efficient DNA recombination system, horizontal gene transfer through natural competence makes of H. pylori one of the most genetically diverse bacteria. We show here that transformation capacity is enhanced in strains defective for recN, extending previous work with other homologous recombination genes. However, inactivation of either mutY or polA has no effect on DNA transformation, suggesting that natural competence can be boosted in H. pylori by the persistence of DNA breaks but not by enhanced mutagenesis. The transformation efficiency of the different DNA repair impaired strains correlates with the number of transforming DNA foci formed on the cell surface and with the expression of comB8 and comB10 competence genes. Overexpression of the comB6-B10 operon is sufficient to increase the transformation capacity of a wild type strain, indicating that the ComB complex, present in the bacterial wall and essential for DNA uptake, can be a limiting factor for transformation efficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28128333 PMCID: PMC5269756 DOI: 10.1038/srep41495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Transformation efficiency in DNA repair mutants.
| strain genotype | n | transformation frequency (×10−4) | Relative value | P value (MWU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt | 31 | 3.9 (0.3; 26) | 1 | |
| 8 | 19.0 (5; 93) | 4.9 | 0.0009 | |
| 11 | 24.7 (0.9; 114) | 6.3 | <0.0001 | |
| 7 | 10.9 (6; 31) | 2.8 | 0.0003 | |
| 6 | 2.2 (0.3; 8) | 0.6 | 0.1231 | |
| 4 | 7.7 (0.3; 12) | 2.0 | 0.3759 | |
| 3 | ND | 0 |
aNumber of independent determinations (from 3 replicates mean in each experiment).
bTransformation tests were performed with genomic DNA conferring Streptomycin resistance (see Methods). The frequencies were calculated as the number of StrR colonies per recipient CFU. Median are indicated; (min; max) correspond respectively to the minimum and the maximum values observed for each strain.
ND (Non Detected)MWU, Mann-Whitney U test between wt and the mutants.
Figure 1Transformation frequencies, foci formation and ComB expression in DNA repair mutants.
(A) Transformation frequencies. The bar represents the median, the boxes display the inner quartile range and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values. Number of experiments and p value determined with Mann-Whitney U test are indicated in Table 1. (B) Microscopy images of fixed bacteria. For each of the indicated strains, merged images are presented with red for FMX64, blue for DAPI and green for ATTO488. Scale bars correspond to 5 μm. (C) Proportion of bacteria with foci. At least 3 independent experiments were analyzed and more than 1200 bacteria were counted for each strain. The percentage of bacteria harboring foci are indicated for the different strains. The bar represents the median, the boxes display the inner quartile range and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values. (D) Western blot of wild-type and different mutants against ComB10 (upper line) and ComB8 (lower line).
Foci formation, ComB8 and ComB10 expression in DNA repair mutants.
| strain genotype | proportion (%) | foci formation (relative value) | P value | ComB expression | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| median (min; max) | ComB8 | ComB10 | |||
| wt | 12.6 (4; 33) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 54.6 (46; 71) | 4.3 | <0.0001 | 2.5 | 3,8 | |
| 47.8 (31; 56) | 3.8 | <0.0001 | 2.5 | 3,7 | |
| 42.9 (33; 66) | 3.4 | <0.0001 | 2.9 | 5,2 | |
| 17.5 (14; 22) | 1.4 | 0.2912 | 1.0 | 1,2 | |
| 13.7 (9; 24) | 1.1 | 0,5472 | 1.3 | 1,1 | |
| 3.3 (0.9; 7) | 0.3 | 0,0096 | 0 | 0 | |
aAt least 3 independent experiments were analyzed and more than 1200 bacteria were counted for each strain. Medians are indicated; (min; max) correspond respectively to the minimum and the maximum values observed for each strain.
bMWU, Mann-Whitney U test for foci formation between wt and the mutants.
cMedians of quantification from 5 to 15 Western blots from independent cultures are presented.
Figure 2comB6 operon overexpression studies.
(A) Schematic representation of the genomic construction for over expression of comB6 operon. (B) Western blot against ComB10 or ComB8 of wild-type and two different strains constructed as indicated in A. (C) Correlation between transformation, foci formation and ComB8 expression in three independent clones overexpressing ComB8. In each experiment, all the values were reported to the value observed with the wt strain.
Effect of comB6-B10 operon overexpression on transformation frequency, foci formation and ComB8 expression.
| strain | Transformation | Foci formation | ComB expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| frequency (×10−4) median (min; max) | Relative value | Proportion, median (min; max) | Relative value | ComB8 | ComB10 | |
| 26695 | 3.9 (0.3; 26) | 1 | 7.3 (4; 12) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| pUreAComB6 | 15.0 (3; 45) | 3,8**** | 17.1 (14; 23) | 2.3*** | 2.6 | 3.0 |
aTransformation frequencies were calculated as the number of StrR colonies per recipient CFU. ****p < 0.0001 with Mann-Whitney U test calculated between wt and the mutant.
b3 independent experiments were analyzed and more than 1200 bacteria were counted for each strain. ***p = 0.0002 with Mann-Whitney U test calculated between wt and the mutant.
cMedians of quantification from Western blots obtained with 3 independent strains are presented.
Transformation frequency, foci formation, ComB8 and ComB10 expression in different strains.
| strain | Transformationa | Foci formationb | ComB expressionc (relative value) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| frequency (×10−4) median (min; max) | Relative value | Proportion, median (min; max) | Relative value | ComB8 | ComB10 | |
| 26695 | 3.9 (0.3; 26) | 1 | 7.3 (4; 12) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| B49 | 0.6 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.2 | 15.4 (4; 21) | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| B38 | 1.7 (0.3; 6) | 0.4 | 8.6 (4; 15) | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| B25 | 4.6 (1; 16) | 1.2 | 24.8 (4; 54) | 3.4 | 3.7 | 1.7 |
| G27 | 8.9 (4; 10) | 2.3 | 30.3 (23; 53) | 4.2 | 5.8 | 4.9 |
| SS1 | 11.6 (3; 14) | 3.0 | 31.6 (26; 45) | 4.3 | 5.7 | 5.1 |
| B128 | 12.3 (6; 17) | 3.2 | 33.9 (25; 55) | 4.6 | 3.0 | 4.1 |
aTransformation frequencies were calculated as the number of StrR colonies per recipient CFU. Three independent experiments were analyzed for each strain.
bAt least 3 independent experiments were analyzed and more than 1200 bacteria were counted for each strain.
abMedian are indicated; (min; max) correspond respectively to the minimum and the maximum values observed for each strain.
cMedians of quantification from 3 Western blots from independent cultures are presented.
Figure 3Transformation frequencies and foci formation in different strains.
(A) Transformation frequencies. The bar represents the median, the boxes display the inner quartile range and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values. Number of experiments and p value determined with Mann-Whitney U test are indicated in Table 1. (B) Proportion of bacteria with foci. At least 3 independent experiments were analyzed and more than 1200 bacteria were counted for each strain. The percentage of bacteria harboring foci are indicated for the different strains. The bar represents the median, the boxes display the inner quartile range and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 4Comparison between transformation, foci formation, ComB8 and ComB10 expression in different strains.
In each experiment, all the values were reported to the value observed with the wt 26695 strain. (A) Comparison in DNA repair mutants in 26695 background. (B) Comparison in different genetic backgrounds.