AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of MR and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) imaging of rectal villous tumours to elucidate the correlation between imaging results and specific histopathological tumour features, such as tumour size (T) and lymph node involvement (N), in order to establish the better technique for the pre-surgical patient evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 cases of villous tumours of the rectum were studied with phased-array MR and TRUS. All patients underwent either surgical or endoscopic treatment. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological results. In particular, the following features were characterized by the imaging techniques mentioned above: lesion site, distance between lesion and ano-rectal junction, size, morphology and contrast enhancement of lesions, fluid layer around the lesion, alterations of the deep layers of the rectal wall, sphincter infiltration, presence or absence of mesorectal, iliac and obturatory lymphnode involvement. RESULTS: Histology established muscular involvement in 7 cases (T2), perirectal fat infiltration in 1 case (T3); in the remaining 15 cases, staging was Tis-T1. In 17/23 cases (73.9%) the lesions were correctly staged with both imaging techniques, whereas in 5/23 cases (21.7%) the lesions were overstaged. No cases were understaged. TRUS concorded with histological exams in 17/23 cases (73.9%). 5/23 cases (21.7%) were overstaged and 1/23 (4%) was understaged. MR and TRUS were in accordance in 20/23 cases (86.9%). DISCUSSION: Considering the frequent degeneration of villous tumours, correct preoperative identification and precise evaluation of these lesions, such as the detection of rectal wall invasion, is essential in deciding optimal treatment strategy. MRI and TRUS allow the identification of specific features of villous tumours and of malignant degeneration, allowing for a correct local disease staging. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of MR and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) imaging of rectal villous tumours to elucidate the correlation between imaging results and specific histopathological tumour features, such as tumour size (T) and lymph node involvement (N), in order to establish the better technique for the pre-surgical patient evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 cases of villous tumours of the rectum were studied with phased-array MR and TRUS. All patients underwent either surgical or endoscopic treatment. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological results. In particular, the following features were characterized by the imaging techniques mentioned above: lesion site, distance between lesion and ano-rectal junction, size, morphology and contrast enhancement of lesions, fluid layer around the lesion, alterations of the deep layers of the rectal wall, sphincter infiltration, presence or absence of mesorectal, iliac and obturatory lymphnode involvement. RESULTS: Histology established muscular involvement in 7 cases (T2), perirectal fat infiltration in 1 case (T3); in the remaining 15 cases, staging was Tis-T1. In 17/23 cases (73.9%) the lesions were correctly staged with both imaging techniques, whereas in 5/23 cases (21.7%) the lesions were overstaged. No cases were understaged. TRUS concorded with histological exams in 17/23 cases (73.9%). 5/23 cases (21.7%) were overstaged and 1/23 (4%) was understaged. MR and TRUS were in accordance in 20/23 cases (86.9%). DISCUSSION: Considering the frequent degeneration of villous tumours, correct preoperative identification and precise evaluation of these lesions, such as the detection of rectal wall invasion, is essential in deciding optimal treatment strategy. MRI and TRUS allow the identification of specific features of villous tumours and of malignant degeneration, allowing for a correct local disease staging. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.