| Literature DB >> 29120409 |
Marina Rumyantseva1, Ekaterina Makeeva2, Alexander Gaskov3, Nikolay Shepel4, Svetlana Peregudova5, Andrey Khoroshutin6, Sergey Tokarev7, Olga Fedorova8,9.
Abstract
This paper deals with the functionalization of nanocrystallineEntities:
Keywords: Cu(II) complex; H2S; organic–inorganic hybrid materials; semiconductor gas sensor; tin dioxide
Year: 2017 PMID: 29120409 PMCID: PMC5707601 DOI: 10.3390/nano7110384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Structures of the metalorganic compounds used for SnO2 modification.
Figure 2(a) UV-Vis absorption spectra of CuChPh (1); CuBiPy (2); CuAzCr (3) in CH3CN; Ccomplex = 3 × 10−5 M. (b) XRD pattern of nanocrystalline SnO2 powder. ICDD data for SnO2 cassiterite phase (41-1445) are presented as a reference.
Data obtained by cyclic voltammetry, Ccomplex = 10−3 M in CH3CN, glassy carbon (GC) electrode (s = 2 mm2), platinum plate as the counter electrode, scan rate 200 mV·s−1.
| Cu(II) Complex | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CuChPh | - | −1.06/−3.34 | - |
| CuBiPy | 1.30/−5.70 | −0.02/−4.38 | 1.32 |
| CuAzCr | 0.94/−5.34 | −0.90/−3.50 | 1.84 |
Figure 3UV-Vis absorption spectra of pure solvents, initial solutions of Cu(II) complexes, and filtrates obtained after separation of the hybrid powder samples: (а) 1 × 10−4 М CuBzPh in CH3CN; (b) 1 × 10−4 М CuBiPy in CH3CN; (c) 1 × 10−4 М CuAzaCr in CH3CN; (d) 1 × 10−4 М CuChPh in THF.
Samples designation, composition, and resistance in pure air.
| Sample | [Cu]/[Sn], at. % | Part of SnO2 Surface Covered by Cu(II) Complex, % | Resistance at 200 °C in Pure air Rair, Ohm |
|---|---|---|---|
| SnO2 | - | - | 2.7 × 103 |
| CuO/SnO2 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | - | 2.1 × 106 |
| CuPc/SnO2 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 11.6 | 6.3 × 107 |
| CuBzPh/SnO2 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 8.9 | 6.5 × 107 |
| CuChPh/SnO2 | 0.013 ± 0.003 | 1.5 | 5.8 × 107 |
| CuBiPy/SnO2 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 3.3 | 1.0 × 108 |
| CuAzaCr/SnO2 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 4.6 | 8.8 × 107 |
Figure 4Weight loss (a) and DTA (b) curves of pure SnO2 and hybrid samples.
Figure 5Room-temperature Raman spectra of hybrid powder samples (1) CuPc/SnO2, (2) CuBzPh/SnO2, (3) CuChPh/SnO2, (4) CuBiPy/SnO2, (5) CuAzaCr/SnO2 in the spectral range of (a) 172–3200 cm−1; (b) 700–1900 cm−1.
Figure 6Raman spectra of CuPc/SnO2 (a) and CuBzPh/SnO2 (b) hybrid samples recorded under in situ step heating up to 500 °C.
Figure 7A diagram reflecting the relative positions of the energy levels for bulk SnO2 and CuBiPy and CuAzaCr complexes: conduction band Ec, valence band Ev, Fermi level EF, work function ϕ, ionization energy IE.
Figure 8(a) The electrical response of different samples to the periodical change of gas phase composition from dry air to 1 ppm H2S/air at 200 °C; (b) The electrical response (1 cycle) and dynamic characteristics of CuBiPy/SnO2 hybrid sample.
Figure 9Sensor signal to CO (40 ppm), NH3 (450 ppm), and H2S (1 ppm) for different samples: (A) SnO2; (B) CuO/SnO2; (C) CuPc/SnO2; (D) CuBzPh/SnO2; (E) CuChPh/SnO2; (F) CuBiPy/SnO2; (G) CuAzaCr/SnO2.
H2S sensors based on p-CuO/n-SnO2 semiconductor materials.
| Type of Sensitive Material | H2S Concentration, ppm | Operating Temperature, °C | Sensor Signal | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramic | 50 | 200 | 3.5 × 104 | [ |
| Ceramic | 300 | 100 | 5.0 × 102 | [ |
| Thick film | 1 | 50 | 8.0 × 103 | [ |
| Thin film | 100 | 150 | 1.0 × 104 | [ |
| Thin film | 100 | 200 | 1.0 × 102 | [ |
| Thin film | 50 | 200 | 2.5 × 104 | [ |
| Thin film | 68.5 | RT | 3.6 × 103 | [ |
| Planar heterostructure | 100 | 160 | 1.7 × 104 | [ |
| Nanoribbons | 3 | RT | 1.7 × 102 | [ |
| Nanowires | 16 | 150 | 2.0 × 106 | [ |
| Nanowires | 20 | 300 | 8.0 × 102 | [ |
| Nanowires | 1 | 300 | 2 | [ |
| Nanowires | 1 | 200 | 7.0 × 102 | [ |
| Nanowire (individual) | 10 | 200 | 2.6 × 101 | [ |
| Hybrid material CuAzaCr/SnO2 | 1 | 200 | 4.3 × 101 | This work |