| Literature DB >> 34947372 |
Timofei Goncharov1, Abulkosim Nasriddinov1,2, Anastasia Zubenko3, Sergey Tokarev3, Tatyana Shatalova2, Nikolay Khmelevsky4, Olga Fedorova3, Marina Rumyantseva2.
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis of H2S sensor properties of nanocrystalline SnO2 modified with Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) as reference sample or Ag organic complexes (AgL1 and AgL2). New hybrid materials based on SnO2 and Ag(I) organometallic complexes were obtained. The microstructure, compositional characteristics and thermal stability of the composites were thoroughly studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescent spectroscopy (XRF), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Gas sensor properties to 2 ppm H2S demonstrated high sensitivity, selectivity toward other reducing gases (H2 (20 ppm), NH3 (20 ppm) and CO (20 ppm)) and good reproducibility of the composites in H2S detection at low operating temperatures. The composite materials also showed a linear detection range in the concentration range of 0.12-2.00 ppm H2S even at room temperature. It was concluded that the predominant factors influencing the sensor properties and selectivity toward H2S in low temperature region are the structure of the modifier and the chemical state of silver. Thus, in the case of SnO2/AgNPs reference sample the chemical sensitization mechanism is more possible, while for SnO2/AgL1 and SnO2/AgL2 composites the electronic sensitization mechanism contributes more in gas sensor properties. The obtained results show that composites based on nanocrystalline SnO2 and Ag(I) organic complexes can enhance the selective detection of H2S.Entities:
Keywords: Ag nanoparticles; Ag organometallic complexes; H2S sensor; low temperature detection; metal oxide gas sensor; nanocrystalline tin dioxide
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947372 PMCID: PMC8707773 DOI: 10.3390/ma14247778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The structures of L1 and L2 ligands.
Figure 2XRD pattern of SnO2 (a) and Raman spectra of composites and pure SnO2 (b).
The elemental composition of materials.
| Sample | SnO2/AgNPs | SnO2/AgL1 | SnO2/AgL2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Ag]/([Ag] + [Sn]), at.% | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.01 |
| [Sn]/([Ag] + [Sn]), at.% | 98.94 ± 0.10 | 98.99 ± 0.10 | 99.02 ± 0.10 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra of pure SnO2 and composites.
Figure 4X-ray photoelectron spectra of the pure SnO2 and composite materials for O1s (a) and Ag3d (b) core level binding energies.
Figure 5Thermal analysis (a) and mass spectrometry curves (b) of SnO2/AgL1 composite.
Figure 6(a) The temperature dependence of the sensors’ resistance of composite materials on the periodical change of the gas phase composition from pure air to 2 ppm H2S in air at different temperatures; (b) Dependence of the sensor signal on temperature at a constant concentration of 2 ppm H2S.
Figure 7The dependence of the sensor signal on H2S concentration at constant temperatures of 25 °C (a) and 100 °C (b).
Figure 8Response time and recovery time of nanocrystalline SnO2 and composite materials toward exposure to 2 ppm H2S gas at the temperature range of 25–150 °C.
Figure 9Sensor signal toward H2S (2 ppm), H2 (20 ppm), NH3 (20 ppm) and CO (20 ppm) for different samples.