Literature DB >> 29120214

Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

Andrew T Marshall1, Kimberly Kirkpatrick1.   

Abstract

Risky decisions are inherently characterized by the potential to receive gains or incur losses, and these outcomes have distinct effects on subsequent decision-making. One important factor is that individuals engage in loss-chasing, in which the reception of a loss is followed by relatively increased risk-taking. Unfortunately, the mechanisms of loss-chasing are poorly understood, despite the potential importance for understanding pathological choice behavior. The goal of the present experiment was to illuminate the mechanisms governing individual differences in loss-chasing and risky-choice behaviors. Rats chose between a low-uncertainty outcome that always delivered a variable amount of reward and a high-uncertainty outcome that probabilistically delivered reward. Loss-processing and loss-chasing were assessed in the context of losses disguised as wins (LDWs), which are loss outcomes that are presented along with gain-related stimuli. LDWs have been suggested to interfere with adaptive decision-making in humans and thus potentially increase loss-making. Here, the rats presented with LDWs were riskier, in that they made more choices for the high-uncertainty outcome. A series of nonlinear models were fit to individual rats' data to elucidate the possible psychological mechanisms that best account for individual differences in high-uncertainty choices and loss-chasing behaviors. The models suggested that the rats presented with LDWs were more prone to showing a stay bias following high-uncertainty outcomes compared to rats not presented with LDWs. These results collectively suggest that LDWs acquire conditioned reinforcement properties that encourage continued risk-taking and increase loss-chasing following previous high-risk decisions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29120214      PMCID: PMC5682951          DOI: 10.1037/xan0000141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  81 in total

1.  Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Reza Habib; Mark R Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?

Authors:  Thom Baguley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2008-11-17

3.  Distinct roles of rodent orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex in decision making.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Sul; Hoseok Kim; Namjung Huh; Daeyeol Lee; Min Whan Jung
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Upping the Reinforcement Rate by Playing the Maximum Lines in Multi-line Slot Machine Play.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Templeton; Mike J Dixon; Kevin A Harrigan; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-09

5.  Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: rats commit the sunk cost error.

Authors:  Paula Magalhães; K Geoffrey White; Tessa Stewart; Emma Beeby; William van der Vliet
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Dopaminergic drugs modulate learning rates and perseveration in Parkinson's patients in a dynamic foraging task.

Authors:  Robb B Rutledge; Stephanie C Lazzaro; Brian Lau; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Serotonergic and dopaminergic modulation of gambling behavior as assessed using a novel rat gambling task.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; Trevor W Robbins; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Dopamine modulates reward expectancy during performance of a slot machine task in rats: evidence for a 'near-miss' effect.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley; Paul J Cocker; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Tonic dopamine modulates exploitation of reward learning.

Authors:  Jeff A Beeler; Nathaniel Daw; Cristianne R M Frazier; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Systemic administration of 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride, but not SCH23390, alters loss-chasing behavior in the rat.

Authors:  Robert D Rogers; Adeline Wong; Chris McKinnon; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  3 in total

1.  Translating concepts of risk and loss in rodent models of gambling and the limitations for clinical applications.

Authors:  C M Freeland; A S Knes; M J F Robinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Rebecca S Hofford; Thomas R Zentall; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Models of Gambling-like Behavior.

Authors:  Cole Vonder Haar
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.