Literature DB >> 23303072

Systemic administration of 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride, but not SCH23390, alters loss-chasing behavior in the rat.

Robert D Rogers1, Adeline Wong, Chris McKinnon, Catharine A Winstanley.   

Abstract

Gambling to recover losses is a common gaming behavior. In a clinical context, however, this phenomenon mediates the relationship between diminished control over gambling and the adverse socioeconomic consequences of gambling problems. Modeling loss-chasing through analogous behaviors in rats could facilitate its pharmacological investigation as a potential therapeutic target. Here, rats were trained to make operant responses that produced both food rewards, and unpredictably, imminent time-out periods in which rewards would be unavailable. At these decision points, rats were offered choices between waiting for these time-out periods to elapse before resuming responding for rewards ('quit' responses), or selecting risky options with a 0.5 probability of avoiding the time-outs altogether and a 0.5 probability of time-out periods twice as long as signaled originally ('chase' responses). Chasing behavior, and the latencies to chase or quit, during sequences of unfavorable outcomes were tested following systemic administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, the D2 receptor antagonist, eticlopride, and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390. 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride significantly reduced the proportion of chase responses, and the mean number of consecutive chase responses, in a dose-dependent manner. 8-OH-DPAT also increased latencies to chase. Increasing doses of eticlopride first speeded, then slowed, latencies to quit while SCH23390 had no significant effects on any measure. Research is needed to identify the precise cognitive mechanisms mediating these kinds of risky choices in rats. However, our data provide the first experimental demonstration that 5-HT1A and D2, but not D1, receptor activity influence a behavioral analog of loss-chasing in rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303072      PMCID: PMC3629409          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  48 in total

1.  The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT reduces rats' accuracy of attentional performance and enhances impulsive responding in a five-choice serial reaction time task: role of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors.

Authors:  M Carli; R Samanin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Risky choice and Weber's Law.

Authors:  A Kacelnik; F Brito e Abreu
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Impulsivity in pathological gambling: the antisocial impulsivist.

Authors:  A Blaszczynski; Z Steel; N McConaghy
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor selectivities of agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  P Seeman; C Ulpian
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  In for a penny, in for a pound: methylphenidate reduces the inhibitory effect of high stakes on persistent risky choice.

Authors:  Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn; Arndis Simonsen; Jørgen Scheel-Krüger; Victoria Wohlert; Trine Gjerløff; Chris D Frith; Robert D Rogers; Andreas Roepstorff; Arne Møller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Personality, addiction, dopamine: insights from Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Alain Dagher; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Serotonin and dopamine play complementary roles in gambling to recover losses.

Authors:  Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn; Judi Wakeley; Vanessa Herbert; Jennifer Cook; Paolo Scollo; Manaan Kar Ray; Sudhakar Selvaraj; Richard E Passingham; Phillip Cowen; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Contrasting roles for dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the dorsomedial striatum but not the nucleus accumbens core during behavioral inhibition in the stop-signal task in rats.

Authors:  Dawn M Eagle; Jacky C K Wong; Michelle E Allan; Adam C Mar; David E Theobald; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Tim D Fryer; Laurent Brichard; Emma S J Robinson; David E H Theobald; Kristjan Lääne; Yolanda Peña; Emily R Murphy; Yasmene Shah; Katrin Probst; Irina Abakumova; Franklin I Aigbirhio; Hugh K Richards; Young Hong; Jean-Claude Baron; Barry J Everitt; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  9 in total

1.  Exploring preferences for variable delays over fixed delays to high-value food rewards as a model of food-seeking behaviours in humans.

Authors:  Laura-Jean G Stokes; Anna Davies; Paul Lattimore; Catharine Winstanley; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Prefrontal Cortical Inactivations Decrease Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort on a Rodent Cost/Benefit Decision-Making Task.

Authors:  Jay G Hosking; Paul J Cocker; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.

Authors:  Brittany N Kuhn; Peter W Kalivas; Ana-Clara Bobadilla
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 5.  Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Katherine M Nautiyal; Mayumi Okuda; Rene Hen; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Uncertainty exposure causes behavioural sensitization and increases risky decision-making in male rats: toward modelling gambling disorder.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; Zhaoxia Li; Daniel C Fisher; Martin H Zack; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  Dissociable effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on decision making biases in rats when loss or gain is emphasized.

Authors:  Melanie Tremblay; Paul J Cocker; Jay G Hosking; Fiona D Zeeb; Robert D Rogers; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Abnormal modulation of reward versus punishment learning by a dopamine D2-receptor antagonist in pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Lieneke Katharina Janssen; Guillaume Sescousse; Mahur Melina Hashemi; Monique Harmina Maria Timmer; Niels Peter ter Huurne; Dirk Everdina Maria Geurts; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Feeding behaviour, risk-sensitivity and response control: effects of 5-HT2C receptor manipulations.

Authors:  Trevor Humby; Yateen Patel; Jenny Carter; Laura-Jean G Stokes; Robert D Rogers; Lawrence S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.