Literature DB >> 29119272

Interaction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RING-domain protein Nse1 with Nse3 and the Smc5/6 complex is required for chromosome replication and stability.

Saima Wani1, Neelam Maharshi1, Deepash Kothiwal1, Lakshmi Mahendrawada1, Raju Kalaivani2, Shikha Laloraya3.   

Abstract

Genomic stability is maintained by the concerted actions of numerous protein complexes that participate in chromosomal duplication, repair, and segregation. The Smc5/6 complex is an essential multi-subunit complex crucial for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Two of its subunits, Nse1 and Nse3, are homologous to the RING-MAGE complexes recently described in human cells. We investigated the contribution of the budding yeast Nse1 RING-domain by isolating a mutant nse1-103 bearing substitutions in conserved Zinc-coordinating residues of the RING-domain that is hypersensitive to genotoxic stress and temperature. The nse1-103 mutant protein was defective in interaction with Nse3 and other Smc5/6 complex subunits, Nse4 and Smc5. Chromosome loss was enhanced, accompanied by a delay in the completion of replication and a modest defect in sister chromatid cohesion, in nse1-103. The nse1-103 mutant was synthetic sick with rrm3∆ (defective in fork passage through pause sites), this defect was rescued by inactivation of Tof1, a subunit of the fork protection complex that enforces pausing. The temperature sensitivity of nse1-103 was partially suppressed by deletion of MPH1, encoding a DNA-helicase. Homology modeling of the structure of the budding yeast Nse1-Nse3 heterodimer based on the human Nse1-MAGEG1 structure suggests a similar organization and indicates that perturbation of the Zn-coordinating cluster has the potential to allosterically alter structural elements at the Nse1/Nse3 interaction interface that may abrogate their association. Our findings demonstrate that the budding yeast Nse1 RING-domain organization is important for interaction with Nse3, which is crucial for completion of chromosomal replication, cohesion, and maintenance of chromosome stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome stability; DNA replication; Mitosis; Molecular genetics; Protein–protein interaction; Yeast two-hybrid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119272     DOI: 10.1007/s00294-017-0776-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   3.886


  59 in total

Review 1.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

2.  Requirement of Nse1, a subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, for Rad52-dependent postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sergio R Santa Maria; Venkateswarlu Gangavarapu; Robert E Johnson; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes.

Authors:  Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Interplay between Top1 and Mms21/Nse2 mediated sumoylation in stable maintenance of long chromosomes.

Authors:  Lakshmi Mahendrawada; Ragini Rai; Deepash Kothiwal; Shikha Laloraya
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 6.  A new twist in the coil: functions of the coiled-coil domain of structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins.

Authors:  Avi Matityahu; Itay Onn
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Genetic evidence for functional interaction of Smc5/6 complex and Top1 with spatial frequency of replication origins required for maintenance of chromosome stability.

Authors:  Ragini Rai; Shikha Laloraya
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination.

Authors:  Giacomo De Piccoli; Felipe Cortes-Ledesma; Gregory Ira; Jordi Torres-Rosell; Stefan Uhle; Sarah Farmer; Ji-Young Hwang; Felix Machin; Audrey Ceschia; Alexandra McAleenan; Violeta Cordon-Preciado; Andrés Clemente-Blanco; Felip Vilella-Mitjana; Pranav Ullal; Adam Jarmuz; Beatriz Leitao; Debra Bressan; Farokh Dotiwala; Alma Papusha; Xiaolan Zhao; Kyungjae Myung; James E Haber; Andrés Aguilera; Luis Aragón
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-06       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Marco Biasini; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Small ubiquitin-related modifier ligase activity of Mms21 is required for maintenance of chromosome integrity during the unperturbed mitotic cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ragini Rai; Satya P M V Varma; Nikhil Shinde; Shilpa Ghosh; Srikala P Kumaran; Geena Skariah; Shikha Laloraya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genome-wide identification of genes encoding putative secreted E3 ubiquitin ligases and functional characterization of PbRING1 in the biotrophic protist Plasmodiophora brassicae.

Authors:  Fangwei Yu; Shenyun Wang; Wei Zhang; Jun Tang; Hong Wang; Li Yu; Xin Zhang; Zhangjun Fei; Jianbin Li
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 2.  A role for the yeast PCNA unloader Elg1 in eliciting the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Soumitra Sau; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 3.  Recruitment, loading, and activation of the Smc5-Smc6 SUMO ligase.

Authors:  Martina Oravcová; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 4.  SMC complexes organize the bacterial chromosome by lengthwise compaction.

Authors:  Jarno Mäkelä; David Sherratt
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.886

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.