| Literature DB >> 29117132 |
Shiya Wen1, Miaozi Li2, Junyu Yang3, Xianglin Mei4, Bin Wu5, Xiaolin Liu6, Jingxuan Heng7, Donghuan Qin8,9, Lintao Hou10, Wei Xu11,12, Dan Wang13,14.
Abstract
CdSexTe1-x semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs), being rod-shaped/irregular dot-shaped in morphology, have been fabricated via a simple hot-injection method. The NCs composition is well controlled through varying molar ratios of Se to Te precursors. Through changing the composition of the CdSexTe1-x NCs, the spectral absorption of the NC thin film between 570-800 nm is proved to be tunable. It is shown that the bandgap of homogeneously alloyed CdSexTe1-x active thin film is nonlinearly correlated with the different compositions, which is perceived as optical bowing. The solar cell devices based on CdSexTe1-x NCs with the structure of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSexTe1-x/MoOx/Au and the graded bandgap ITO/ZnO/CdSe(w/o)/CdSexTe1-x/CdTe/MoOx/Au are systematically evaluated. It was found that the performance of solar cells degrades almost linearly with the increase of alloy NC film thickness with respect to ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.2Te0.8/MoOx/Au. From another perspective, in terms of the graded bandgap structure of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSexTe1-x/CdTe/MoOx/Au, the performance is improved in contrast with its single-junction analogues. The graded bandgap structure is proved to be efficient when absorbing spectrum and the solar cells fabricated under the structure of ITO/ZnO/CdSe0.8Te0.2/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au indicate power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.37%, a value among the highest for solution-processed inversely-structured CdSexTe1-x NC solar cells. As the NC solar cells are solution-processed under environmental conditions, they are promising for fabricating solar cells at low cost, roll by roll and in large area.Entities:
Keywords: CdTe; graded bandgap; nanocrystal; solar cells
Year: 2017 PMID: 29117132 PMCID: PMC5707597 DOI: 10.3390/nano7110380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1TEM images of CdSexTe1−x alloy NCs with different composition: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.1, (c) x = 0.2, (d) x = 0.4, (e) x = 0.6 and (f) x = 0.
Figure 2(a) The XRD pattern of the CdSexTe1−x NCs with different composition and (b) the EDS results for CdSexTe1−x NCs with different composition.
Figure 3(a) The absorption patterns of the CdSexTe1−x NCs with different Se content; (b) the plots of (аhv)2 versus photon energy of the CdSexTe1−x NCs thin film with different Se content; and (c) the bandgap value of the CdSexTe1−x NCs thin film with different Se content.
Hole mobility of CdSexTe1−x NC thin films.
| Sample | Hole Mobility (cm2v−1s−1) |
|---|---|
| CdTe | 2.02 × 10−4 |
| CdSe0.1Te0.9 | 2.20 × 10−4 |
| CdSe0.2Te0.8 | 3.48 × 10−4 |
| CdSe0.4Te0.6 | 4.05 × 10−4 |
| CdSe0.6Te0.4 | 4.34 × 10−4 |
| CdSe0.8Te0.2 | 3.07 × 10−4 |
Figure 4(a) Cross-section SEM image of the glass/ITO/ ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/Au/MoOx device and (b) J-V characteristics of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/Au/MoOx devices with different annealing temperatures under light.
Summarized performances of CdSe0.2Te0.8 NC solar cells with different annealing temperatures (Figure 4b).
| Annealing Temperature (°C) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 330 | 0.62 | 13.55 | 43.67 | 3.67 |
| 350 | 0.63 | 16.04 | 36.68 | 3.71 |
| 370 | 0.42 | 15.23 | 35.22 | 2.25 |
| 400 | 0.49 | 13.06 | 31.11 | 1.99 |
Figure 5(a) Schematic of the vertically-graded bandgap structure of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSexTe1−x/CdTe/MoOx/Au, (b) energy diagram of the above devices, J-V characteristics of the above devices (c) under light and (d) dark, (e) EQE properties of the above devices, (f) the PCE of devices with different thickness of CdSe0.2Te0.8 alloy NC films (device structure: ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au).
Summarized performances of vertically-graded bandgap NC solar cells (Figure 5).
| Device | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.05Te0.95/CdTe/MoOx/Au | 0.69 | 11.31 | 32.77 | 2.56 | 28.32 | 227.97 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.1 | 0.66 | 16.32 | 44.10 | 4.77 | 22.15 | 244.44 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.2 | 0.63 | 16.54 | 54.93 | 5.75 | 9.24 | 442.68 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.4 | 0.63 | 16.32 | 35.26 | 3.64 | 17.99 | 87.36 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.6 | 0.67 | 12.34 | 42.28 | 3.51 | 33.89 | 166.83 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdSe0.8 | 0.60 | 10.26 | 38.78 | 2.39 | 33.30 | 226.21 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdTe/MoOx/Au | 0.61 | 19.05 | 46.91 | 5.45 | 16.20 | 236.09 |
Figure 6(a) J-V characteristics of Device A (ITO/ZnO/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au, black) and Device B (ITO/ZnO/CdSe0.8Te0.2/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au, red) under light (inset shows the J-V under dark) and (b) the corresponding EQE properties of these devices.
Summarized performances of Device A and Device B (Figure 6).
| Device | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au | 0.59 | 18.59 | 32.56 | 4.03 | 25.94 | 147.68 |
| ITO/ZnO/CdSe0.8Te0.2/CdSe0.2Te0.8/CdTe/MoOx/Au | 0.67 | 19.70 | 48.25 | 6.37 | 15.00 | 422.13 |