| Literature DB >> 36080104 |
Ao Xu1, Qichuan Huang1, Kaiying Luo1, Donghuan Qin1, Wei Xu1, Dan Wang1, Lintao Hou2.
Abstract
The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of solution-processed CdTe nanocrystals (NCs) solar cells has been significantly promoted in recent years due to the optimization of device design by advanced interface engineering techniques. However, further development of CdTe NC solar cells is still limited by the low open-circuit voltage (Voc) (mostly in range of 0.5-0.7 V), which is mainly attributed to the charge recombination at the CdTe/electrode interface. Herein, we demonstrate a high-efficiency CdTe NCs solar cell by using organic polymer poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA) as the hole transport layer (HTL) to decrease the interface recombination and enhance the Voc. The solar cell with the architecture of ITO/ZnO/CdS/CdSe/CdTe/PTAA/Au was fabricated via a layer-by-layer solution process. Experimental results show that PTAA offers better back contact for reducing interface resistance than the device without HTL. It is found that a dipole layer is produced between the CdTe NC thin film and the back contact electrode; thus the built-in electric field (Vbi) is reinforced, allowing more efficient carrier separation. By introducing the PTAA HTL in the device, the open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current density and the fill factor are simultaneously improved, leading to a high PCE of 6.95%, which is increased by 30% compared to that of the control device without HTL (5.3%). This work suggests that the widely used PTAA is preferred as the excellent HTL for achieving highly efficient CdTe NC solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: CdTe; PTAA; hole transfer materials; nanocrystal; solar cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080104 PMCID: PMC9458081 DOI: 10.3390/nano12173067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1A schematic of NC solar cell fabrication process.
Figure 2(a) UV−vis absorption spectrum of PTAA in chlorobenzene solution; and (b) cyclic voltammetry curve of PTAA in chlorobenzene solution.
Figure 3Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of PTAA on ITO/ZnO/CdS/CdSe/CdTe with different concentrations: (a) without PTAA; (b) 3 mg mL−1 PTAA; (c) 5 mg mL−1 PTAA; (d) 7 mg mL−1 PTAA.
Figure 4J–V characteristics of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdTe/PTAA/Au devices with (a) different PTAA concentrations and (b) annealing temperatures.
Summarized photovoltaic parameters from J–V curves of CdTe NC solar cells prepared under different conditions.
| Device | VOC (V) | JSC (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.58 | 14.61 | 42.28 | 3.58 |
| B | 0.67 | 20.32 | 36.87 | 5.00 |
| C | 0.68 | 21.06 | 37.40 | 5.41 |
| D | 0.70 | 21.54 | 35.38 | 5.29 |
| E | 0.71 | 19.26 | 39.26 | 5.40 |
| F | 0.69 | 22.33 | 37.17 | 5.70 |
| G | 0.60 | 19.35 | 36.44 | 4.25 |
| H | 0.62 | 15.41 | 55.96 | 5.34 |
| I | 0.68 | 21.47 | 47.81 | 6.95 |
Figure 5(a) J–V curves of ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdTe/PTAA(w/o)/Au. (b) Corresponding EQE spectra. (c) Dark J–V characteristic curves.
Figure 6SCLC measurements of holy−only devices: (a) without; and (b) with PTAA (device structure: ITO/CdTe (200 nm)/PTAA/Au.
Figure 7(a) The XPS spectra of Cd 3d peaks; (b) Mott–Schottky C−V curve of devices; (c) schematic of energy levels influenced by a dipole layer (PTAA) at the CdTe/Au interface.
Binding energy of N, P and Cd elements in CdTe and CdTe/PTAA films.
| Thin Film | N 1s | P 2p | Cd 3d3/2 | Cd 3d5/2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CdTe | - | 133.12 | 412.01 | 405.13 |
| CdTe/PTAA | 399.82 | 133.71 | 412.60 | 405.72 |