| Literature DB >> 28788077 |
Rongfang Wu1, Yuehua Yang2, Miaozi Li3, Donghuan Qin4, Yangdong Zhang5, Lintao Hou6.
Abstract
PbS colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) solar cells have already demonstrated very impressive advances in recent years due to the development of many different techniques to tailor the interface morphology and compactness in PbS CQDs thin film. Here, n-hexane, n-octane, n-heptane, isooctane and toluene or their hybrids are for the first time introduced as solvent for comparison of the dispersion of PbS CQDs. PbS CQDs solar cells with the configuration of PbS/TiO₂ heterojunction are then fabricated by using different CQDs solution under ambient conditions. The performances of the PbS CQDs solar cells are found to be tuned by changing solvent and its content in the PbS CQDs solution. The best device could show a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.64% under AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW cm-2 in a n-octane/isooctane (95%/5% v/v) hybrid solvent scheme, which shows a ~15% improvement compared to the control devices. These results offer important insight into the solvent engineering of high-performance PbS CQDs solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: PbS; colloidal quantum dots; solar cells; solvent engineering
Year: 2017 PMID: 28788077 PMCID: PMC5575683 DOI: 10.3390/nano7080201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Summarized properties of different solvent.
| Solvent Name | Polarity | Viscosity (Pa·s) | Boiling Point (°C) | Absorption Wavelength (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n-octane | 0.06 | 0.53 | 125 | 200 |
| isooctane | 0.10 | 0.53 | 99 | 210 |
| heptane | 0.20 | 0.41 | 98 | 200 |
| n-hexane | 0.06 | 0.33 | 69 | 210 |
| toluene | 2.40 | 0.59 | 111 | 285 |
Figure 1(a) TEM image of as prepared PbS CQDs (b) UV-absorption spectra of PbS CQDs in different solvents. CQD = colloidal quantum dots.
Figure 2(a) Schematic of FTO/ZnO/TiO2/PbS/Au device architecture (b) The cross-sectional SEM images of a representative device.
Figure 3J–V characteristics of PbS/TiO2 solar cells fabricated by using different single solvent (a) under light (b) under dark.
Photovoltaic parameters obtained from the J–V curves (Figure 3a) for solar cells with different single solvent.
| Solvent | Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) (%) | Fill Factor (FF) (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n-octane | 6.67 | 22.04 | 0.54 | 56.04 |
| isooctane | 4.62 | 19.00 | 0.52 | 46.76 |
| heptane | 4.69 | 21.63 | 0.52 | 41.70 |
| n-hexane | 4.12 | 19.30 | 0.49 | 43.57 |
| toluene | 6.59 | 20.60 | 0.56 | 57.13 |
Figure 4AFM (atomic force microscope) images of PbS CQDs thin films prepared by using different solvent (a) n-octane; (b) isooctane; (c) n-hexane; (d) toluene.
Figure 5(a) J–V characteristic of PbS CQDs solar cells with n-octane/isooctane hybrid solvent and (b) the corresponding EQE spectrum; (c) J–V characteristic of PbS CQDs solar cells with n-octane/toluene hybrid solvent and (d) the corresponding EQE spectrum.
Photovoltaic parameters obtained from the J–V curves (Figure 5a,c) for solar cells with n-octane/isooctane and n-octane/toluene hybrid solvent.
| 5% | 7.64 | 26.29 | 0.54 | 53.82 | 4.97 | 205.55 |
| 10% | 7.26 | 26.38 | 0.54 | 50.93 | 5.47 | 109.21 |
| 20% | 6.99 | 23.10 | 0.54 | 56.04 | 4.83 | 173.90 |
| 40% | 6.08 | 22.90 | 0.54 | 49.17 | 7.02 | 104.33 |
| 60% | 5.64 | 21.10 | 0.53 | 50.43 | 7.94 | 132.37 |
| 5% | 5.84 | 20.87 | 0.53 | 52.80 | 9.29 | 131.23 |
| 10% | 5.31 | 21.57 | 0.50 | 49.24 | 11.37 | 109.94 |
| 20% | 5.09 | 21.74 | 0.51 | 45.91 | 12.19 | 104.65 |
| 40% | 3.85 | 23.20 | 0.41 | 40.48 | 8.20 | 55.56 |
| 60% | 3.51 | 18.80 | 0.42 | 44.45 | 8.52 | 100.00 |
Figure 6AFM (atomic force microscope) images for PbS CQDs thin film fabricated by using different n-octane/isooctane solvent (a) 5% isooctane (b) 10% isooctane (c) 20% isooctane (d) 40% isooctane.
Figure 7AFM (atomic force microscope) images for PbS CQDs thin film fabricated by using different n-octane/toluene solvent (a) 5% toluene (b) 10% toluene (c) 20% toluene (d) 40% toluene.