Literature DB >> 29111964

A phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of antimycin biosynthesis.

Rebecca Joynt1, Ryan F Seipke2,1.   

Abstract

Streptomyces species and other Actinobacteria are ubiquitous in diverse environments worldwide and are the source of, or inspiration for, the majority of antibiotics. The genomic era has enhanced biosynthetic understanding of these valuable chemical entities and has also provided a window into the diversity and distribution of natural product biosynthetic gene clusters. Antimycin is an inhibitor of mitochondrial cytochrome c reductase and more recently was shown to inhibit Bcl-2/Bcl-XL-related anti-apoptotic proteins commonly overproduced by cancerous cells. Here we identify 73 putative antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in publicly available genome sequences of Actinobacteria and classify them based on the presence or absence of cluster-situated genes antP and antQ, which encode a kynureninase and a phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase), respectively. The majority of BGCs possess either both antP and antQ (L-form) or neither (S-form), while a minority of them lack either antP or antQ (IQ- or IP-form, respectively). We also evaluate the biogeographical distribution and phylogenetic relationships of antimycin producers and BGCs. We show that antimycin BGCs occur on five of the seven continents and are frequently isolated from plants and other higher organisms. We also provide evidence for two distinct phylogenetic clades of antimycin producers and gene clusters, which delineate S-form from L- and I-form BGCs. Finally, our findings suggest that the ancestral antimycin producer harboured an L-form gene cluster which was primarily propagated by vertical transmission and subsequently diversified into S-, IQ- and IP-form biosynthetic pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Streptomyces; antimycin; evolution of biosynthetic gene clusters; natural products; secondary metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29111964      PMCID: PMC5883857          DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


Introduction

Microbial natural products, particularly those produced by filamentous Actinobacteria, have been a cornerstone of the pharmaceutical industry for more than half a century [1]. The genes encoding natural product biosynthesis are typically grouped together into a gene cluster, which possibly enhances their transmissibility and the evolution of chemical diversity [2]. Little is understood about the forces driving these processes, but access to large datasets of genome sequences provides an opportunity for exploration. Antimycin-type depsipeptides are a large and diverse family of natural products widely produced by Streptomyces species [3]. The family’s namesake, the nine-membered ringed antimycins, were discovered more than 65 years ago [4]. Ring-extended members of this family have also been identified and include: JBIR-06 (12-membered ring), neoantimycin (15-membered ring) and respirantin (18-membered ring) [5-7]. All of these compounds possess antifungal, insecticidal and nematocidal activity, as a result of their ability to inhibit mitochondrial cytochrome c reductase via a conserved 3-formamidosalicylate moiety [8]. Antimycins are used commercially as a fish biocide, but were recently found to be potent and selective inhibitors of the mitochondrial Bcl2/Bcl-xL-related anti-apoptotic proteins, which are over-produced by cancer cells and confer resistance to apoptotic chemotherapeutic agents [9]. To date, the biosynthesis of antimycins has been reported for a myriad of environmental isolates, but it was not until recently that the hybrid non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)/polyketide synthase (PKS) biosynthetic pathway that directs their assembly was revealed in a strain of Streptomyces albus [10]. The ~25 kb antimycin biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) harboured by S. albus is composed of 15 genes organized into four polycistronic operons, antAB, antCDE, antFG and antHIJKLMNO (Fig. 1) [11]. The biosynthetic gene cluster was recently used as the basis for the reconstitution of antimycin biosynthesis in vitro [12, 13] and heterologous production using Escherichia coli [14] and S. coelicolor [15]. The biosynthesis and activation of the unusual starter unit, 3-formamidosalicylate, is specified by the genes antFGHIJKLNO [12, 14, 16]. The di-modular NRPS, AntC and the unimodular PKS, AntD comprise the NRPS-PKS assembly line, while AntE and AntM are crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase and discrete ketoreductase enzymes, respectively, and AntB is an acyltransferase responsible for the acyloxyl moiety and the chemical diversity observed at R1 (Fig. 1) [13]. The expression of the antimycin BGC is coordinately regulated with the candicidin BGC by a LuxR-family regulator, FscRI, which activates expression of antABCDE [15]. The antA gene encodes a cluster-situated extracytoplasmic function RNA polymerase sigma (σ) factor named σAntA, which activates transcription of the antGF and antHIJKLMNO operons [11].
Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of L-, IQ-, IP- and S-form antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters. AT, acyltransferase; NRPS, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase; PKS, polyketide synthase; CCR, crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase; PPTase, phosphopantetheinyl transferase. Antimycins: Antimycin A1, R1=COCH(CH3)CH2CH3, R2=(CH2)4CH3; Antimycin A2, R1=COCH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)4CH3; Antimycin A3, R1=COCH2CH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)2CH3; Antimycin A4, R1=COCH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)2CH3.

Schematic representation of L-, IQ-, IP- and S-form antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters. AT, acyltransferase; NRPS, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase; PKS, polyketide synthase; CCR, crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase; PPTase, phosphopantetheinyl transferase. Antimycins: Antimycin A1, R1=COCH(CH3)CH2CH3, R2=(CH2)4CH3; Antimycin A2, R1=COCH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)4CH3; Antimycin A3, R1=COCH2CH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)2CH3; Antimycin A4, R1=COCH(CH3)2, R2=(CH2)2CH3. Intriguingly, subsequent identification of antimycin biosynthetic pathways in other taxa revealed that the BGC possesses up to four architectures [17]: short-form (S-form, 15 genes), intermediate-form (IQ- or IP-form, 16 genes) and long-form (L-form, 17 genes), based on the absence (S-form) or presence (L-form) of two cluster-situated genes, antP and antQ, which encode a kynureninase and phosphopantetheinyl transferase, respectively. I-form BGCs harbour either antP (IP) or antQ (IQ), but not both (Fig. 1). How the antimycin BGC evolved into these various architectures is an intriguing question and one that we sought to address with this study. Here we identify 73 antimycin BGCs (five known and 68 putative) in publicly available genome sequences of Actinobacteria and evaluate their biogeographical distribution and phylogenetic relationships. Isolation metadata suggest that the antimycin BGC has a large biogeographical range, with isolation of putative antimycin producers from at least five continents. Our phylogenetic analyses support the existence of two distinct clades of antimycin producers and BGCs which delineate S-form from L- and I-form BGCs. Finally, our findings suggest that the ancestral antimycin producer harboured an L-form BGC that was primarily propagated by vertical transmission and subsequently diversified into S-, IQ- and IP-form biosynthetic pathways.

Methods

Identification of putative antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters

The genomes available in GenBank on 9 May 2017 for select genera of Actinobacteria (Actinobactera, Actinomadura, Actinospica, Amycolatopsis, Kitasatospora, Micromonospora, Nocardia, Saccharopolyspora, Planomonospora, Pseudonocardia, Salinispora, Streptacidiphilus and Streptomyces) were downloaded using the ncbi-genome-download python script provided by Kai Blin available at https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-genome-download. One thousand four hundred and twenty-one genomes were downloaded in total and were subsequently annotated using Prokka 1.12 [18]. Next, annotated GenBank files were modified using the Unix commands grep and sed to move the unique gene prefix generated by Prokka from the ‘/locus_tag’ field to the ‘/gene’ field. A multigeneblast database was created using the makedb programme of multigeneblast version 1.1.13 and the processed GenBank files from above [19]. The genes antFGHIJKLMNOPQ of the antimycin BGC from S. ambofaciens ATCC 23877 [16] were used as a multigeneblast query with the default settings. The resulting output was inspected manually to identify genomes harbouring a putative antimycin BGC. PROmer [20] and the S. ambofaciens antimycin BGC were used to identify contigs comprising antimycin BGCs split across more than one contig. This applied to the following taxa: S. gancidicus BKS 13–15, S. sp. B9173, S. sp. CC71, S. sp. HNS054, S. sp. IgraMP-1, S. sp. MBT28, S. sp. NRRL B-24085, S. sp. TOR3209 and S. sp. SM8. S. wadayamensis strain A23, which harbours a putative S-form antimycin BGC, was discarded because it lacked multiple phylosift markers (see below).

Phylogenetic analyses

In order to infer a species phylogeny, 29 single-copy phylogenetic markers (13 061 nt in total) were identified and extracted using Phylosift version 1.0.1 (Tables S1) [21] and concatenated in the order: DNGNGWU00002, DNGNGWU00003, DNGNGWU00007, DNGNGWU00009, DNGNGWU00010, DNGNGWU00011, DNGNGWU00012, DNGNGWU00014, DNGNGWU00015, DNGNGWU00016, DNGNGWU00017, DNGNGWU00018, DNGNGWU00019, DNGNGWU00021, DNGNGWU00022, DNGNGWU00023, DNGNGWU00024, DNGNGWU00025, DNGNGWU00026, DNGNGWU00027, DNGNGWU00028, DNGNGWU00029, DNGNGWU00030, DNGNGWU00031, DNGNGWU00033, DNGNGWU00034, DNGNGWU00036, DNGNGWU00037, DNGNGWU00040. The concatenated phylogenetic marker sequences were aligned using 16 iterations of muscle [22] and the .fasta format alignment was converted to sequential phylip format using Geneious R8.1.19. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred from this alignment using the web-implementation of PhyML3.0 available at www.atgc-montpellier.fr/phyml/ [23]. In order to infer a phylogeny for putative antimycin BGCs, 10 genes (antFGHIJKLMNO) were extracted and aligned using muscle. The resulting alignment was imported into Geneious R8.1.19 and manually trimmed to the same length prior to concatenating sequences in the following gene order: antFGHIJKLMNO. The concatenated alignment was then converted to sequential phylip format and a phylogenetic tree was inferred using PhyML3.0 as above.

Likelihood analysis

Reconstruction of the ancestral state was performed essentially as described previously [24]. Briefly, the trace character function of Mesquite v3.2 [25] was used to infer the ancestral node for the antimycin BGC within the species tree. A categorical character matrix for BGC type was created and likelihood calculations were performed using the Mk1 model.

Results and discussion

Identification of putative antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in Actinobacteria

Established and putative antimycin BGCs were previously identified within the genomes of 14 Streptomyces species [17, 26]. However, casual analyses of the genome sequences available in GenBank suggested that this number is likely to be far greater. In order to formally assess this possibility, 1421 publically available genome sequences for select Actinobacteria genera (i.e. those with a history of natural products production: (Actinobactera, Actinomadura, Actinospica, Amycolatopsis, Kitasatospora, Micromonospora, Nocardia, Saccharopolyspora, Planomonospora, Pseudonocardia, Salinispora, Streptacidiphilus and Streptomyces) were downloaded and annotated using Prokka 1.12 [18]. The Prokka annotation enabled the construction of a customized mutligeneblast database, which was subsequently used in conjunction with the antFGHIJKLMNOPQ genes from S. ambofaciens and multigeneblast 1.1.13 [19] to generate a list of taxa harbouring a putative antimycin BGC. The genes antFGHIJKLMNO were selected on the basis that they are essential for antimycin biosynthesis and are conserved in all established antimycin BGCs; antPQ were also included in order to permit the tentative classification of gene cluster architecture (see below). Close inspection of gene clusters from the candidate list resulted in the identification of an antimycin BGC in 73 taxa (five known and 68 putative) (Table 1). Among these, five are described as non-Streptomyces species: Saccharopolyspora flava DSM 44771, Streptacidiphilus albus JL83, Streptacidiphilus albus NBRC 100918, Actinospica acidiphila NRRL B-24431 and Actinobacteria bacterium OV320 (Table 1).
Table 1.

Actinobacteria harbouring a putative antimycin biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC)

OrganismSourceGenome accessionAntimycin BGC form*
SIPIQL
Actinobacteria bacterium OV320Populus trichocarpa, Corvallis, Oregon, USALJCX00000000.1
Actinospica acidiphilaNRRL B-24431Soil, Gerenzano, ItalyJNYX00000000.1
Saccharopolyspora flava DSM 44771FOZX00000000.1
Streptacidiphilus albus JL83Soil, Co. Durham, UKJQML00000000.1
Streptacidiphilus albus NBRC 100918BBPL00000000.1
Streptomyces albidoflavus NRRL B-1271JOII00000000.1
Streptomyces albidoflavus OsiLf-2Rice, Changsha, Hunan, ChinaMNPQ00000000.1
Streptomyces albidoflavus R-53649FWFA00000000.1
Streptomyces albus J1074†CP004370.1
Streptomyces albus S4†Acromyrmex octospinosus, TrinidadCADY00000000.1
Streptomyces albus SM254Soil, Soudan, Minnesota, USACP014485.1
Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC 23877†Soil, Picardie, FranceCP012382.1
Streptomyces ambofaciens DSM 40697Soil, Rome, ItalyCP012949.1
Streptomyces antibioticus DSM 41481Soil, USACM007717.1
Streptomyces caelestis NRRL B-24567LGCN00000000.1
Streptomyces gancidicus BKS 13–15Soil, Odisha, IndiaAOHP00000000.1
Streptomyces griseoflavus Tu4000ACFA00000000.1
Streptomyces griseorubens strain JSD-1Soil, Shanghai, ChinaJJMG00000000.1
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NRRL B-2307JNZI00000000.1
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NRRL F-5618JOGU00000000.1
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NRRL F-5621JOGN00000000.1
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NRRL WC-3066LLZL00000000.1
Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. jinggangensis 5008CP003275.1
Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. jinggangensis TL01CP003720.1
Streptomyces longwoodensis DSM 41677LMWS00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. M10Marine sediment, Dalian, ChinaAMZL00000000.1
Streptomyces mirabilis OV308JQJV00000000.1
Streptomyces pluripotens MUSC 135Mangrove, MalaysiaJTDH00000000.1
Streptomyces pluripotens MUSC 137Mangrove, MalaysiaJUIF00000000.2
Streptomyces radiopugnans CGMCC 4.3519FOET00000000.1
Streptomyces sampsonii KJ40Poplar tree rhizosphere, Ya’an, Sichuan, ChinaCP016824.1
Streptomyces sp. 303MFCol5.2ARTR00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. 4FSoil, Shanghai, ChinaCP013142.1
Streptomyces sp. Amel2xC10FWZW00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. AVP053U2Marine sediment, Avery Point, Connecticut, USALMTQ00000000.2
Streptomyces sp. B9173Ocean sediment, GermanyNAVC00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. BvitLS-983FMCF00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. CC71Sediment from Churince hydrological system, Cuatro, Cienegas, Coahuila, MexicoLOSR00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. CdTB01Soil, Changsha, ChinaCP013743.1
Streptomyces sp. CNQ431†Marine sediment, La Jolla, California, USAJTCK00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. CNY228ARIN00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. F-7FKJH00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. FR-008CP009802.1
Streptomyces sp. GBA 94–10Phakellia ventilabrum, Trondheimfjord, NorwayCM002271.1
Streptomyces sp. HNS054Unknown sponge, Fujian, ChinaLDZX00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. IgraMP-1FMCM00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. JHA26Soil, JapanBDJC00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. KE1Human skin, New Delhi, India‡LAYX00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. LaPpAH-202Petalomyrmex phylax plant-ants, CameroonARDM00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. MBT28Soil, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, SpainLARV00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. MUSC 125Mangrove, MalaysiaJUIG00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NBRC 110035BBNN00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NBRC 110468BBYG00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL B-24085Peanut, South AfricaLJBR00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL B-2790JOHI00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL B-3253JOGQ00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL F-2305JOFW00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL F-4835JOIEL00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL F-5008Farm feed lot waste, Norris Farms, Dickson Mounds, Illinois, USAJOHW00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL F-5527Tobacco, unknown location‡JOHL00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL S-1314JOHU00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. NRRL S-37Soil, El SalvadorJOIZ00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. PVA 94–07Phakellia ventilabrum, Trondheimfjord, NorwayCM002273.1
Streptomyces sp. Root1310Arabidopsis thaliana root, Cologne, GermanyLMEQ00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. Root1319Arabidopsis thaliana root, Cologne, GermanyLMEU00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. Root55Arabidopsis thaliana root, Cologne, GermanyLMFT00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. ScaeMP-6WFMBX00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. SM8†Sponge, Galway, IrelandAMPN00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. SolWspMP-5a-2FMCI00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. TOR3209Tomato rhizosophere, unknown location‡AGNH00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. URHA0041Mediterranean grassland soilJNIH00000000.1
Streptomyces sp. XY152Soil, Urbana, Illinois, USALGDQ00000000.1
Streptomyces yokosukanensis DSM 40224Soil, Yokosuka City, JapanLMWN00000000.1

*See Fig. 1 and manuscript text for definitions of S-, IP-, IQ- and L-form BGCs.

†Antimycin production verified experimentally.

‡Location not mapped in Fig. 2.

*See Fig. 1 and manuscript text for definitions of S-, IP-, IQ- and L-form BGCs. Antimycin production verified experimentally. ‡Location not mapped in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Geographical distribution of 38 Actinobacteria harbouring a putative antimycin biosynthetic gene cluster. Map pins are colour-coded based on gene cluster classification. The map is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rXUFJXSt8szUYMuCJExQbEP4X1k.

Inspection of loci identified as encoding 3-formamidosalicylate biosynthetic genes revealed a few noteworthy peculiarities. Streptomyces albus subsp. albus strain NRRL B-2513 possesses a clear 3-formamidosalicylate locus, but lacks antM and the core NRPS-PKS biosynthetic machinery at this locus or elsewhere in the genome; and Streptomyces phaeoluteigriseus strain DSM 41896 has endured at least two frameshift mutations in antD, which presumably render it non-functional. In addition, Streptomyces lincolnensis strain NRRL 2936, Streptomyces sp. yr375 and Streptomyces sp. ERV7 each harbour the same antimycin-like BGC. However, gene rearrangement and insertion is evident: for example, a small locus of fatty acid anabolism genes has been inserted between the 3-formamidosalicylate biosynthetic genes and the NRPS-PKS machinery, suggesting that the biosynthetic pathway may not in fact produce antimycins. These strains and BGCs were discarded as a consequence of these peculiarities.

Classification of antimycin BGCs

Antimycin BGCs exist in four architectures, and the gene clusters identified here were classified as short-form (S-form, 15 genes), intermediate-form (IP- or IQ-form, 16 genes) and long-form (L-form, 17 genes), based on the absence (S-form) or presence (L-form) of two cluster-situated genes: antP, which encodes a kynureninase (InterPro ID, IPR010111) involved in the production of the 3-formamidosalicylate starter unit, and antQ, which is a phosphopantetheinyl transferase (InterPro ID, IPR0082788) responsible for the post-translational modification of the NRPS/PKS assembly line to its pantetheinylated form [17]. The organization of the genes within antimycin BGCs shows 100 % synteny (Fig. 1), and their functions are described in Table 2. Annotation of the putative biosynthetic pathways identified above resulted in the classification of 25 S-form, 13 IP-form, five IQ-form and 30 L-form antimycin BGCs (Table 1).
Table 2.

Functions of proteins encoded by antimycin BGCs

ProteinFunction
AntAExtracytoplasmic function RNA polymerase sigma factor
AntBAcyltransferase
AntCDimodular non-ribosomal peptide synthetase
AntDUnimodular polyketide synthase
AntECrotonyl-CoA reductase/decarboxylase
AntFAcyl-CoA ligase
AntGPeptidyl carrier protein
AntHMulti-component oxygenase
AntIMulti-component oxygenase
AntJMulti-component oxygenase
AntKMulti-component oxygenase
AntLMulti-component oxygenase
AntMKetoreductase
AntNTryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase
AntON-formylase
AntPKynureninase
AntQPhosphopantetheinyl transferase
The first step in the biosynthesis of the 3-formamidosalicylate starter unit is oxygenation of the indole ring of tryptophan by the AntN tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase, resulting in kynurenine. This is then presumably converted to anthranilate by the AntP kynureninase (harboured by L- and IP-forms), whereas in the S- and IQ-forms this functionality is provided by the housekeeping kynureninase involved in normal tryptophan catabolism [17]. AntF then activates anthranilate, which is subsequently loaded onto the AntG carrier protein. An important point is that although the L- and IP-forms possess AntP and thus have a ‘dedicated’ source of anthranilate, all variants of the antimycin biosynthetic pathway are able to access anthranilate from the ‘core’ anthranilate pool within the cell, which is corroborated by feeding studies with exogenous fluoroanthranilates [16]. The maintenance of antP by L- and IP-forms and its loss by S- and IQ-forms may be driven by physiological differences, for instance the availability of cytosolic anthranilate. It is perhaps not surprising that AntQ is not essential in the S- and IP-forms; in fact, most NRPS and PKS biosynthetic systems lack a cluster-situated PPTase and are dependent on the promiscuity of one or more PPTase enzymes encoded elsewhere in the genome. This is clearly the case for S- and IP-form antimycin BGCs, but it may not be so for L-form antimycin BGCs, as antimycin production was abolished in an S. ambofaciensantQ mutant [27]. The contextual requirement of antP and antQ for antimycin biosynthesis creates the opportunity for divergent evolution of the antimycin BGC.

Biogeographical distribution of antimycin biosynthesis

The biogeography of natural products biosynthesis is an emerging area and one that can not only guide future natural products bioprospecting campaigns, but which enables formulation of interesting questions in chemical microbial ecology [24, 28]. Thus, we curated isolation metadata for putative antimycin producers to ascertain any patterns in source material or its geographical origin. The breadth of data varied considerably, but a source and/or country location was available in GenBank or within the literature for 38 out of 73 strains (Table 1). Sample collection data were plotted onto a world map and pins were colour-coded based on gene cluster architecture. Inspection of the resulting map did not show an obvious link between gene cluster architecture and geographical location, but did reveal that putative antimycin producers have been isolated from a relatively large geographical area, including at least five of the seven continents: Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America (Fig. 2). Only a single strain originates from the southern hemisphere, which is surprising; however, this is likely a consequence of the inherent limitations of the dataset. Like geographical location, gene cluster architecture and isolation source material do not appear to be related, however, but as anticipated, many strains originate from various soil ecosystems (17 in total) or marine sediments (four in total), which supports the long-standing view that these niches are rich sources of bioactive metabolites. Interestingly, 18 of the strains were isolated from plants, sponges or insects, suggesting that they may be involved in symbioses, which is in line with the increasing number of reports implicating antibiotic-producing strains as defensive symbionts of higher organisms [29, 30]. Overall, these data suggest that antimycin-producing Actinobacteria are likely distributed worldwide, which may reflect the significance of producing an inhibitor of eukaryotic cytochrome c reductase in diverse niches. Geographical distribution of 38 Actinobacteria harbouring a putative antimycin biosynthetic gene cluster. Map pins are colour-coded based on gene cluster classification. The map is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rXUFJXSt8szUYMuCJExQbEP4X1k.

Distribution of antimycin BGCs within Actinobacteria

The collection of putative antimycin BGCs identified here provides an opportunity to further explore their phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships. A multi-locus phylogeny was reconstructed in order to evaluate the taxonomic distribution of antimycin BGCs. Phylosift was used to identify and extract phylogenetic markers from the genome of each microbe described in Table 1. This resulted in the identification of 29 phylogenetic markers present in single copy in each taxon (see Table S1, available in the online version of this article for description of markers). The markers were concatenated, aligned (length 13 119 nt) and used to infer a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3). Inspection of the resulting phylogeny suggested that six strains have been taxonomically mis-assigned. For instance, Actinospica acidiphila strain NRRL B-24431 and Actinobacteria bacterium strain OV320 group closely with Streptomyces species placed within the interior of the tree, and are therefore likely to be members of the genus Streptomyces (Fig. 3). Additionally, four taxa designated as S. griseus (S. griseus subsp. griseus NRRL B-2307, S. griseus subsp. griseus NRRL F-5618, S. griseus subsp. griseus NRRL F-5621, S. griseus subsp. griseus NRRL WC-3066) group within the S. albus J1074 clade and are thus likely strains of this species and not strains of the streptomycin producer, S. griseus.
Fig. 3.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 73 Actinobacteria analysed in this study. The phylogeny is based on 29 concatenated ribosomal protein DNA sequences. SH-like support values are indicated at nodes as decimal values. Colours indicate gene cluster classification. The scale bar represents 5 % sequence divergence.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 73 Actinobacteria analysed in this study. The phylogeny is based on 29 concatenated ribosomal protein DNA sequences. SH-like support values are indicated at nodes as decimal values. Colours indicate gene cluster classification. The scale bar represents 5 % sequence divergence. Next, the phylogenetic tree was colour-coded based on the gene cluster architectures determined above. The sixth bifurcation divides the tree into two major clades, one of which contains 24 of the 25 strains harbouring an S-form antimycin BGC (Clade I), and a second that contains strains harbouring exclusively IP-, IQ- and L- form antimycin BGCs (Clade II, Fig. 3). Within Clade I, all 24 S-form strains are closely related to S. albus J1074. Within Clade II, 50 % of the L-form antimycin BGCs are harboured by taxa that comprise a single subclade near the top of the tree that includes several isolates from the United States Department of Agriculture NRRL collection, as well as A. acidiphila NRRL B-24431 (Fig. 3). The remaining L-form antimycin BGCs are harboured by small groupings of strains as well as singletons, and interspersed amongst L-form taxa are those that harbour IQ- and IP-form gene clusters (Fig. 3). Interestingly, seven strains fall outside of Clades I and II: S. sp. URHA0041 (S-form), S. radiopugnans CGMCC 4.3519 (IQ-form), S. flava DSM 44771 (IP-form), and S. sp. Root1319, S. sp. Root55, S. albus JL83 and S. albus NRBC 100918 (all L-form), which suggests that either these strains may be closely related to the ancestral antimycin producer or the genes for antimycin biosynthesis were horizontally acquired by these strains (Fig. 3).

Antimycin BGC phylogeny

A ML phylogeny was inferred from concatenated sequences of antFGHIJKLMNO (alignment length 9736 nt) and colour-coded based on gene cluster architecture as above, in order to evaluate the evolutionary relationships of antimycin BGCs. These genes were selected because they are conserved in all BGCs and changes to their DNA sequence should not impact antimycin biochemical diversity. The third bifurcation divides the tree into two major clades, Clade I which harbours only S-form antimycin BGCs and Clade II which harbours exclusively L-, IQ- and IP-form antimycin BGCs (Fig. 4). As with the phylosift phylogeny above, 24 of the 25 S-form antimycin BGCs comprise a closely related clade, which was anticipated after the revelation that all of these BGCs are harboured by strains closely related to S. albus J1074 (Fig. 4). L-form antimycin BGCs appear throughout Clade II; 14 of the 30 L-forms clade together at the top of the tree and the majority of the remainder comprise smaller groupings consisting of five, three and two members with two singletons. Four of the five IQ-form BGCs clade together and are flanked on either side by L-form antimycin BGCs. IP-form antimycin BGCs form two clades in the centre of the tree comprising a total of 12 of the 13 gene clusters. Overall, the tree highlights that phylogenetic placement of antimycin BGCs is linked to their gene cluster architecture in the majority of cases. There are three notable exceptions to this – S. albus JL83, S. albus NBRC 100918 and S. sp. URHA0041 do not group into either Clade I or II and their basal position within the phylogeny may suggest a close relationship with the ancestral antimycin BGC (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 73 antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters analysed in this study. The phylogeny is based on concatenated antFGHIJKLMNO DNA sequences. SH-like support values are indicated at nodes as decimal values. Colours indicate gene cluster classification. The scale bar represents 5 % sequence divergence.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 73 antimycin biosynthetic gene clusters analysed in this study. The phylogeny is based on concatenated antFGHIJKLMNO DNA sequences. SH-like support values are indicated at nodes as decimal values. Colours indicate gene cluster classification. The scale bar represents 5 % sequence divergence.

Antimycin BGC evolution

There are obvious similarities between the species and BGC trees. For instance, both trees bifurcate to separate S-form from IQ-, IP- and L-form taxa and BGCs. This, combined with the presence of gene cluster architecture subclades in both trees, suggests that speciation has been the primary driver for dissemination of the antimycin BGC. With respect to the both the species and BGC trees, it is reasonable to propose that antimycin biosynthesis evolved once and that the ancestral antimycin producer harboured an L-form BGC. To test this hypothesis, a likelihood analysis was used to predict the ancestral node for each architecture of the antimycin BGC based on its distribution within the phylosift phylogeny. As expected, the likelihood analysis predicted that the ancestral antimycin producer harboured an L-form BGC (Fig. 5). This supports a model in which loss of antP and/or antQ, rather than their frequent independent acquisition, resulted in diversification of gene cluster architecture. The ancestral antimycin producer likely gave rise to S. albus JL83, S. albus NBRC 100918 and S. sp. URHA0041, but S. sp. URHA0041 lost antP and antQ after speciation. The same ancestral L-form strain presumably also seeded Clade I where antP and antQ were lost in the process, but were retained during the genesis of Clade II. One major diversification event likely occurred to give rise to most of the IP-form antimycin BGCs, but a second diversification event appears to have occurred where antQ was lost by the ancestor of S. sp. NRRL B-2790, S. pluripotens MUSC 135, S. pluripotens MUSC137 and S. sp. MUSC125, but was retained by the two S. hygroscopicus strains with which the aforementioned clade. Finally, four of the five IQ-form BGCs are derived from the L-form ancestor of S. ambofaciens ATCC 23877 and S. ambofaciens DSM 40697.
Fig. 5.

Likelihood analysis of ancestral antimycin BGC architectures. Filled circles are colour-coded to represent the proportional likelihood of BGC architecture at ancestral nodes within the species phylogeny depicted based on the ribosomal protein DNA sequences in Fig. 3.

Likelihood analysis of ancestral antimycin BGC architectures. Filled circles are colour-coded to represent the proportional likelihood of BGC architecture at ancestral nodes within the species phylogeny depicted based on the ribosomal protein DNA sequences in Fig. 3. Although the phylosift and BGC trees are consistent with that proposed above, there is noticeable discordance between the two phylogenies. The most profound of these are highlighted below. Three closely related strains, S. gancidicus, S. sp. NRRL S-1314 and S. sp. NRRL F-5527, group within the large subclade of L-form BGCs in Clade II of the phylosift tree, but shift to occupy a distantly related lineage in Clade II of the antFGHIJKLMNO phylogeny. This suggests that the parent of the S. gancidicus subclade likely received its L-form gene cluster by horizontal gene transfer. The same is also likely true for S. sp. NRRL B-24085, which is located within the centre of Clade II in the phylosift tree, but then joins the large L-form subclade of Clade II in the BGC tree. Interestingly, Sacharropolyspora flava DSM 44771, which is an ‘outlier’ in the phylosift tree (i.e. does not group within Clade I or II), becomes part of Clade II in the BGC tree and shares an ancestral node with the three-membered S. gancidicus subclade described above. This suggests that S. flava and the S. gancidicus subclade likely received their antimycin BGC from the same or a closely related ancestor, and is consistent with the hypothesis that S. flava originally harboured an l-form BGC, but independently lost antQ to give rise to its IP-form BGC. In addition, three other outliers from the phylosift tree group within Clade II of the BGC tree: S. sp. Root1319, S. sp. Root55 and S. radiopugnans, which suggests that their antimycin BGC was horizontally acquired and moreover that S. radiopugnans probably independently evolved an IQ-form antimycin BGC from the clade founder.

Conclusions and perspectives

In this study, 73 antimycin BGCs were identified in the genome sequences of Actinobacteria deposited in GenBank. The isolation data for these strains indicate that antimycin-producing actinomycetes are likely globally distributed, highlighting a potentially important role for inhibiting cytochrome c reductase in diverse ecological niches. The majority of the antimycin BGCs identified contained both the antP kynureninase and the antQ PPTase (L-form), or neither of these (S-form), while a minority of the gene clusters lacked either the antP or antQ (IQ- or IP-form, respectively). Phylogenetic analyses revealed two distinct lineages separating S-form from L-, IQ- and IP-form strains and BGCs, and although a handful of taxa appear to have acquired the antimycin BGC via horizontal gene transfer, the primary means for dissemination of the gene cluster is vertical transmission. The contextual requirement of antP and antQ presumably permitted divergent evolution of the antimycin biosynthetic pathway. We propose that the ancestral antimycin producer harboured an L-form antimycin BGC, which spawned two main clades, one composed of S-forms that lack both antP and antQ, and one composed of L-forms with distinct subclades of IP- and IQ-forms (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.

Proposed evolutionary path of the antimycin BGC. The ancestral antimycin producer likely harboured an l-form gene cluster which independently lost either antP, antQ or both of these genes to give rise to the IQ-, IP- and S-form gene clusters, respectively.

Proposed evolutionary path of the antimycin BGC. The ancestral antimycin producer likely harboured an l-form gene cluster which independently lost either antP, antQ or both of these genes to give rise to the IQ-, IP- and S-form gene clusters, respectively.
  28 in total

1.  Inhibition of electron transport by antimycin A, alkyl hydroxy naphthoquinones and metal coordination compounds.

Authors:  A L TAPPEL
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 2.  Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010.

Authors:  David J Newman; Gordon M Cragg
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.050

3.  Characterization of AntB, a promiscuous acyltransferase involved in antimycin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Moriah Sandy; Xuejun Zhu; Zhe Rui; Wenjun Zhang
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 4.  Natural Products and the Gene Cluster Revolution.

Authors:  Paul R Jensen
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 17.079

5.  Diversity and evolution of secondary metabolism in the marine actinomycete genus Salinispora.

Authors:  Nadine Ziemert; Anna Lechner; Matthias Wietz; Natalie Millán-Aguiñaga; Krystle L Chavarria; Paul Robert Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The structure of neoantimycin.

Authors:  L Caglioti; D Misiti; R Mondelli; A Selva; F Arcamone; G Cassinelli
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.457

7.  Respirantin, a novel insecticidal cyclodepsipeptide from Streptomyces.

Authors:  I Urushibata; A Isogai; S Matsumoto; A Suzuki
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme?

Authors:  Ryan F Seipke; Martin Kaltenpoth; Matthew I Hutchings
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  eSNaPD: a versatile, web-based bioinformatics platform for surveying and mining natural product biosynthetic diversity from metagenomes.

Authors:  Boojala Vijay B Reddy; Aleksandr Milshteyn; Zachary Charlop-Powers; Sean F Brady
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-07-24

10.  Regulation of antimycin biosynthesis by the orphan ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor σ (AntA.).

Authors:  Ryan F Seipke; Elaine Patrick; Matthew I Hutchings
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: new concepts for natural product discovery.

Authors:  Doris A van Bergeijk; Barbara R Terlouw; Marnix H Medema; Gilles P van Wezel
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Uncovering production of specialized metabolites by Streptomyces argillaceus: Activation of cryptic biosynthesis gene clusters using nutritional and genetic approaches.

Authors:  Adriana Becerril; Susana Álvarez; Alfredo F Braña; Sergio Rico; Margarita Díaz; Ramón I Santamaría; José A Salas; Carmen Méndez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Advances in actinomycete research: an ActinoBase review of 2019.

Authors:  Samuel M M Prudence; Emily Addington; Laia Castaño-Espriu; David R Mark; Linamaría Pintor-Escobar; Alicia H Russell; Thomas C McLean
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  Regulation of Antimycin Biosynthesis Is Controlled by the ClpXP Protease.

Authors:  Bohdan Bilyk; Sora Kim; Asif Fazal; Tania A Baker; Ryan F Seipke
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.389

5.  A chromatogram-simplified Streptomyces albus host for heterologous production of natural products.

Authors:  Asif Fazal; Divya Thankachan; Ellie Harris; Ryan F Seipke
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Comparative genomics of Alexander Fleming's original Penicillium isolate (IMI 15378) reveals sequence divergence of penicillin synthesis genes.

Authors:  Ayush Pathak; Reuben W Nowell; Christopher G Wilson; Matthew J Ryan; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.