| Literature DB >> 29110725 |
Jae Yong Park1, Chenyu Wang2, Hee Dong Kim2, Hyong Nyun Kim3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon rupture is a challenging injury to lead with clawing of the great toe when the FHL tendon is repaired too tight. When the diagnosis is delayed, the tendon ends may not be opposable because of contracture or poor tendon tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Flexor hallucis longus; Great toe; Split tendon lengthening; Tendon defect; Tendon rupture
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29110725 PMCID: PMC5674746 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0668-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Degenerative tendon tissue was excised at the proximal and the distal ends of the rutpured FHL tendon and the defect size was measured between the both ends of the tendon
Fig. 2a In the midfoot, a longitudinal incision was made along the upper border of abductor hallucis muscle. b The FHL and FDL tendon were identified at the knot of Henry. A split incision (dotted line) was started at the knot of Henry and advanced distally 1.5 cm longer than the measured size of the tendon defect to divide FHL longitudinally into half. c Before the vertical cut at the end of the split incision, the whip stitch was made at both ends of the split tendon to secure the tendon from retracting proximally. FHL flexor hallucis longus, FDL flexor digitorum longus.
Fig. 3The vertical cut at the end of the split incision made the distal part of the FHL tendon move distally for lengthening
Fig. 4The whip stitch was made at the distal end of the ruptured tendon and was pulled down distally
Fig. 5The length of the FHL tendon was determined at the midfoot where FHL was split. Overlap area of the split tendon was temporarily sutured in neutral position of the joints and was tested for balance with patient’s active movement. With the patient in ankle block anesthesia, the great toe could be actively moved by the patient and the length of the tendon could be adjusted when it was too tight or too loose
Patients’ demographics and the results
| No. | Age | Sex | Injury pattern | Duration | Tendon size defect (mm) | FU (months) | Active IP joint plantarflexion | AOFAS score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | M | Laceration | 6 weeks | 18 | 63 | Impossible | 80 |
| 2 | 21 | M | Dislocation | 6 weeks | 18 | 54 | Possible | 95 |
| 3 | 24 | M | Laceration | 4 weeks | 21 | 53 | Possible | 95 |
| 4 | 54 | M | Dislocation | 8 weeks | 16 | 26 | Possible | 100 |
| 5 | 40 | M | Dislocation | 7 weeks | 20 | 24 | Possible | 90 |