| Literature DB >> 36013539 |
Chiara Polichetti1,2, Tommaso Greco1,2, Michele Inverso1,2, Giulio Maccauro1,2, Fabrizio Forconi3, Carlo Perisano1.
Abstract
Checkrein deformity (CD) is a dynamic deformity of the hallux characterized by flexion contracture of the interphalangeal (IF) joint and extension contracture of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, worsened by ankle dorsiflexion. It is due to post-traumatic or ischemic retraction of the long hallux flexor tendon (FHL) following soft tissue trauma, leg fractures, ankle fractures and, more rarely, calcaneal or talar fractures. Diagnosis is essentially clinical, associated with imaging, to rule out unrecognized causes and evaluate fracture healing process. Few cases are reported in literature without univocal treatment. Background andEntities:
Keywords: Z-plasty; checkrein deformity; claw toe deformity; flexor hallucis longus; foot deformities; tibial fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36013539 PMCID: PMC9412890 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.948
Figure 1Pre-surgery clinical images of case no.6 in the series. (a) Checkrein Deformity (CD) at dorsiflexion and (b) resolution of the deformity with ankle plantar flexion.
Figure 2Case no. 4 in the series. (a) The retro-malleolar curvilinear approach to the tarsal tunnel. (b) Incision of the flexor retinaculum. (c) Exposition of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon after opening of tendon sheath. (d) The FHL tendon Z-plasty sutured using 2-0 Ethibond.
Results.
|
| 14 | |
|
| 8M, 6F (57.1%; 42.9%) | |
|
| 37.4 ± 14.6 (range 19–63) | |
| 7.0 ± 3.2 (range 1–12) | ||
| 10 | ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 32.0 ± 10.6 (range 18–48) | ||
M: Male; F: Female; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; MTP: Metatarsophalangeal; IP: Interphalangeal; AOFAS: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society; Pre: Pre-surgery; Post: Post-surgery. * mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Demographic characteristics and clinical features of patients.
| No. | Sex | Age | Etiology | First Treatment | Onset of Deformity (Months after Trauma) | Affected Toes | Follow-up (Months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 50 | Tibial and fibular shaft fracture | IMN | 10 | 1 | 36 |
| 2 | F | 25 | Open distal tibial and fibular fracture # | EF + Plate and screws | 8 | 1, 2 | 20 |
| 3 | F | 32 | Bimalleolar ankle fracture | Plate and screws | 10 | 1 | 42 |
| 4 | M | 63 | Tibial and fibular shaft fracture | IMN | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| 5 | M | 21 | Tri-malleolar ankle fracture | Plate and screws | 9 | 1 | 48 |
| 6 | M | 19 | Tibial and fibular shaft fracture | IMN | 2 | 1 | 24 |
| 7 | F | 53 | Tibial plafond fracture # | Plate and screws | 1 | 1, 2, 3 | 36 |
| 8 | M | 28 | Tri-malleolar ankle fracture | Plate and screws | 5 | 1 | 36 |
| 9 | M | 39 | Tibial and fibular shaft fracture | IMN | 8 | 1 | 20 |
| 10 | F | 47 | Distal tibial and fibular fracture # | EF + Plate and screws | 10 | 1, 2 | 48 |
| 11 | M | 33 | Distal tibial and fibular fracture | Plate and screws | 6 | 1 | 18 |
| 12 | F | 20 | Open tibial shaft fracture | EF + IMN | 8 | 1, 2, 3 | 42 |
| 13 | F | 36 | Tibial plafond fracture # | Plate and screws | 12 | 1 | 32 |
| 14 | M | 58 | Bimalleolar ankle fracture | Plate and screws | 3 | 1 | 22 |
M: Male; F: Female; IMN: Intramedullary nailing; EF: External Fixation # Compartment syndrome.
Figure 3Post-surgery clinical images of case no.6 in the series. (a) Correction of deformity at dorsiflexion and (b) at plantar flexion of ankle.
Comparison of VAS score, ROM and AOFAS score pre- and post-surgery.
| No. | VAS | Hallux | Hallux | AOFAS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| 1 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 70 | 10 | 47 | 90 |
| 2 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 40 | 66 | 15 | 24 | 72 |
| 3 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 35 | 65 | 10 | 37 | 82 |
| 4 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 75 | 5 | 42 | 92 |
| 5 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 60 | 10 | 32 | 97 |
| 6 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 35 | 70 | 15 | 47 | 67 |
| 7 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 65 | 15 | 52 | 77 |
| 8 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 35 | 60 | 10 | 34 | 79 |
| 9 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 45 | 10 | 38 | 85 |
| 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 40 | 63 | 5 | 47 | 90 |
| 11 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 10 | 32 | 88 |
| 12 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 30 | 72 | 20 | 57 | 79 |
| 13 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 35 | 60 | 15 | 40 | 90 |
| 14 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 65 | 10 | 28 | 91 |
VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; MTP: Metatarsophalangeal; IP: Interphalangeal; AOFAS: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society; Pre: Pre-surgery; Post: Post-surgery.
Literature analysis.
| Authors, Year | Number of Cases | Sex | Age | Etiology | Fingers Involved | Time Trauma to Deformity (Months) | Treatment | Follow-Up (Months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr [ | 2 | F | 21 | Calcaneus Fracture | 1 | Within 5 days | Tendon dislocation reduction | 30 |
| Leitschuh et al. [ | 1 | M | 61 | Weber C ankle fracture | 1 | 18 | Release + medial tenodesis | NS |
| Rosenberg and Sferra [ | 1 | M | 14 | Salter-Harris II distal tibia fracture and distal fibular shaft fracture | 1, 2 | 1,5 | Release + retro-malleolar tenodesis of tibialis posterior to FDL+ great toe IP and second toe PIP capsulotomies | NS |
| Feeney et al. [ | 10 | 8M-2F | 27 * | 8 tibial shaft fracture; | (1) 2–5 | 6 | FHL/FDL tendon lengthening with Z plasty | 12 |
| Sanhudo and Lompa [ | 2 | 1M-1F | 45 | Distal fibular graft for hip surgery; Weber C ankle fracture | 1 | 2 | (I) release + retro-malleolar tendon lengthening (II) FHL and FDL lengthening at midfoot | NS |
| Lee and Kim [ | 11 | 6M-5F | 36 * | Bimalleolar, tri-malleolar, pilon, biosseous leg fracture, soft tissue injury without fracture | (5) 1 | 3.5 * | (6) midfoot lengthening of FHL by Z plasty(+2 weeks with short removable splint) (5) release and musculotendinous Z-plasty lengthening | 20.4 * |
| Kim et al. [ | 1 | M | 44 | Ankle sprain with talar fracture | 1 | 2 | fracture reduction+ tendon release with posteromedial approach | 2 |
| Holcomb et al. [ | 1 | M | 19 | Distal tibia fracture | 1–2–3 | 60 | FHL tenotomy over the IP joint + hallux IP joint arthrodesis | 12 |
| Sinnet et al. [ | 1 | M | 22 | Distal tibia and fibula fracture | 1 | 48 | Midfoot FHL tendon Z-plasty | 3 |
| Abolfotouh et al. [ | 3 | M | 40 | Intra-articular talar fracture | 1 | 0 | Fracture reduction + tendon release | 24 |
| Yuen and Lui [ | 1 | M | 36 | Tibial and fibular shaft fracture | 1–2–3 | 6 | Rehabilitation therapy first, FHL tendon Z-plasty with posteromedial approach to the distal tibia | 17 |
| Tanwar et al. [ | 1 | M | 26 | Peri-talar dislocation | 1 | 0 | Dislocation reduction + stabilization with 2 Kirschner wires across subtalar joint and 1 across talonavicular joint | NS |
| Lee et al. [ | 8 | 6M-2F | 39,5 * | Tibiofibular, distal fibular fracture and crush injury around the ankle | 1–2 | 8.4 * | Retro-malleolar FHL tendon Z-plasty | 3.4 * |
| Park et al. [ | 5 | M | 34,8 * | 2) laceration on great toe | 1 | 1.5 * | Midfoot FHL tendon Z-plasty | 44 |
| Gadhavi et al. [ | 1 | M | 25 | Distal tibia fracture | 1 | 24 | Midfoot FHL tendon Z-plasty | 3 |
| Bai et al. [ | 1 | M | 32 | Ankle fracture-dislocation combined with syndesmosis injury | 1 | 2 | Removal of the suture-button device + midfoot FHL tendon tenotomy and suture of distal part of the FHL to the FDL | 24 |
| Feng at al. [ | 1 | F | 28 | Fibular grafting for mandibular ameloblastoma | 1–2–3 | 20 days | Physical rehabilitation therapy | 6 |
| Sallent et al. [ | 2 | M | 27 | Fibular free flap for mandibular mesenchymal chondrosarcoma/squamous carcinoma | 1–2 | NS | Hallux arthrodesis + midfoot FHL tendon Z-plasty and FDL tendon tenotomy | NS |
| Rodriguez-Collell and Mifsut-Miedes [ | 1 | M | 37 | Soft tissue trauma (compartment Syndrome) | 1–2 | 12 | Retro-malleolar FHL tendon Z-plasty and application of a pulvertaft suture to the flexor hallucis longus | NS |
| Greco et al. [ | 1 | M | 63 | Open tibia and fibula fracture | 1 | 7 | Retro-malleolar FHL tendon Z-plasty | 24 |
M: Male; F: Female; NS: Not specified; FHL: Flexor hallucis longus; FDL: Flexor digitorum longus; IP: Interphalangeal; PIP: Proxiaml Interphalangeal. * mean.