Literature DB >> 24737661

Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Imaging to Treat Cam Deformities: Correlation With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

James R Ross1, Asheesh Bedi2, Rebecca M Stone3, Elizabeth Sibilsky Enselman2, Michael Leunig4, Bryan T Kelly5, Christopher M Larson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the diagnosis and surgical treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), 3-dimensional (3D) imaging is the gold standard for detecting femoral head-neck junction malformations preoperatively. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is used by many surgeons to evaluate and verify adequate correction of the deformity.
PURPOSE: (1) To compare radial reformatted computed tomography (CT) scans with 6 defined intraoperative fluoroscopic views before surgical correction to determine whether fluoroscopy could adequately depict cam deformity, and (2) to define the influence of femoral version on the clock-face location of the maximum cam deformity on these views. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 50 hips (48 patients) that underwent arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic FAI by a single surgeon were analyzed. Each patient underwent a CT scan and 6 consistent intraoperative fluoroscopy views: 3 views in hip extension and 3 views in hip flexion of 50°. The alpha angles of each of the fluoroscopic images were compared with the radial reformatted CT using a 3D software program. Femoral version was also defined on CT studies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test, with P < .05 defined as significant.
RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of patients were male, average age 28 years (range, 15-56 years). The maximum mean alpha angle on fluoroscopy was 65° (range, 37°-93°) and was located on the anteroposterior (AP) 30° external rotation (ER) fluoroscopy view. In comparison, the mean CT-derived maximum alpha angle was 67° and was located at 1:15 (P = .57). The mean clock-face positions of each of the fluoroscopy views (standardized to the right hip) were AP 30° internal rotation, 11:45; AP 0° (neutral) rotation, 12:30; AP 30° ER, 1:00; flexion/0° (neutral) rotation, 1:45; flexion/40° ER, 2:15; and flexion/60° ER, 2:45. Increased femoral anteversion (>20°) was associated with a significant change in the location of the maximum alpha angle (1:45 vs 1:15; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: The described 6 fluoroscopic views are very helpful in localization and visualization of the typical cam deformity from 11:45 to 2:45 and can be used to reliably confirm a complete intraoperative resection of cam-type deformity in most patients. These views correlate with preoperative 3D imaging and may be of even greater importance in the absence of preoperative 3D imaging.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cam lesion; computer modeling; femoroacetabular impingement; fluoroscopy; hip arthroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737661     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514529515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

1.  Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

Authors:  Cara Beth Lee; Hillard T Spencer; Kirsten F Nygaard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-05

2.  Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study.

Authors:  Steffen J Haider; Alan H Siegel; Kevin F Spratt; James B Ames; J Allen Graham; Yvonne Y Cheung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study.

Authors:  James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; Olusanjo Adeoye; Olusanjo Adeoyo; Bryan T Kelly; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgical Technique of the "Up-The-Neck" View During Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Sunita R Mengers; John T Strony; Ajit Vakharia; Charles A Su; Gary Edwards; Michael J Salata
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Orthopaedic surgeons' use and knowledge of ionizing radiation during surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Adriana J Saroki; Coen Wijdicks; Marc J Philippon; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Characterization and Correction of Symptomatic Hip Impingement in American Football Linemen.

Authors:  James R Ross; Moin Khan; Benjamin C Noonan; Christopher M Larson; Bryan T Kelly; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-03-05

Review 7.  Open and Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Rachel M Frank; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-12-02

8.  What the Papers Say.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  Intraoperative Guidance for the Surgical Correction of Cam Deformities Using Hip Arthroscopy Based on Alpha Angle Measurement.

Authors:  Safa Gursoy; Amar S Vadhera; Harsh Singh; Allison Perry; Shane J Nho; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-04-26

10.  The Femoroacetabular Impingement Resection (FAIR) Arc: An Intraoperative Aid for Assessing Bony Resection During Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Bogdan A Matache; Daniel J Kaplan; Jordan Fried; Christopher Burke; Mohammad Samim; Thomas Youm
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.