Literature DB >> 25056990

Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Two-year follow-up.

Asheesh Gupta1, John M Redmond1, Christine E Stake1, Nathan A Finch1, Kevin F Dunne1, Benjamin G Domb2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are currently no studies that have examined the recurrence of the cam lesion after femoral neck osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. Although patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores at midterm follow-up have shown continued success, the maintenance of a normalized alpha angle has not been shown radiographically.
PURPOSE: To assess the radiographic recurrence of cam deformity at 2-year follow-up after adequate decompression during the index hip arthroscopic procedure and correlate the findings with PRO scores. The hypothesis was that there would be no recurrence or regrowth of the cam deformity at the 2-year postoperative time point after adequate cam decompression during hip arthroscopic surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Between March 2009 and January 2011, data were prospectively collected on all patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery with femoral neck osteoplasty. Minimum follow-up was 2 years, with radiographic images for review.
RESULTS: A total of 47 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the participants at the start of the study was 37.18 years (range, 31.70-47.43 years). There were 28 men (59.57%) and 19 women (40.43%). The mean follow-up duration was 28.32 months (range, 24-41 months). The mean preoperative alpha angle (Dunn view) was 70° (range, 60°-97°), compared with 42.79° (range, 32°-50°) at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < .0001). The mean 2-year alpha angle was 42.72° (range, 32°-54°), which was not significantly different compared with the mean 2-week alpha angle (P = .93). Additionally, the mean femoral offset measurement was 3.7 mm (range, 0-9.9 mm) preoperatively and 7.8 mm (range, 0.3-13.9 mm) 2 weeks postoperatively (P < .0001). The mean 2-year postoperative femoral offset measurement was 8.0 mm (range, 2.4-12.8 mm), which was not significantly different compared with the mean 2-week femoral offset measurement (P = .63). All PRO scores were significantly improved at 3 months compared with preoperative scores and, except for visual analog scale score, continued to show improvement at 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION: There was no recurrence of cam deformity at 2 years after femoral neck osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. PRO scores were improved at the 3-month and 2-year postoperative time points.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cam; femoroplasty; hip arthroscopic surgery; hip impingement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056990     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514541782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  10 in total

1.  Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

Authors:  Cara Beth Lee; Hillard T Spencer; Kirsten F Nygaard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 2.  Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroaceabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; Kyle Martin; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Andrew Duong; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study.

Authors:  Steffen J Haider; Alan H Siegel; Kevin F Spratt; James B Ames; J Allen Graham; Yvonne Y Cheung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  [Surgical hip dislocation : Current status in the treatment of femoral acetabular impingement].

Authors:  F Sitterlee; S Kirschbaum; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  High affinity recognition of a Phytophthora protein by Arabidopsis via an RGD motif.

Authors:  V Senchou; R Weide; A Carrasco; H Bouyssou; R Pont-Lezica; F Govers; H Canut
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  REHABILITATION AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY AND LABRAL REPAIR IN A HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL ATHLETE: A 3.6 YEAR FOLLOW-UP WITH INSIGHT INTO POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-08

7.  There is no definite consensus on the adequate radiographic correction in arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Abdullah Khan; Jeffrey Kay; David Slawaska-Eng; Mahmoud Almasri; Nicole Simunovic; Andrew Duong; Marc R Safran; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  Higher risk of cam regrowth in adolescents undergoing arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement correction: a retrospective comparison of 33 adolescent and 74 adults.

Authors:  Tomoya Arashi; Yoichi Murata; Hajime Utsunomiya; Shiho Kanezaki; Hitoshi Suzuki; Akinori Sakai; Soshi Uchida
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

10.  Revision Surgery and Progression to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Correction of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Alice Baroncini; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.