Tamsyn Street1, Christine Singleton2. 1. a Clinical Science and Engineering , Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust , Salisbury , UK. 2. b West Midlands Rehabilitation Centre , Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS , Birmingham , UK.
Abstract
CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the presence of a training effect for rehabilitation of walking function in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) through daily use of functional electrical stimulation (FES). SETTING: A specialist FES outpatient centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five participants (mean age 53, SD 15, range 18-80; mean years since diagnosis 9, range 5 months - 39 years) with drop foot and motor-incomplete SCI (T12 or higher, ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) able to ambulate 10 metres with the use of a walking stick or frame. INTERVENTIONS: FES of the peroneal nerve, glutei and hamstrings as clinically indicated over six months in the community. OUTCOME MEASURES: The data was analysed for a training effect (difference between unassisted ten metre walking speed at baseline and after six months) and orthotic effects (difference between walking speed with and without FES) initially on day one and after six months. The data was further analysed for a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) (>0.06 m/s). RESULTS: A clinically meaningful, significant change was observed for initial orthotic effect (0.13m/s, CI: 0.04-0.17, P = 0.013), total orthotic effect (0.11m/s, CI: 0.04-0.18, P = 0.017) and training effect (0.09m/s, CI: 0.02-0.16, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that daily independent use of FES may produce clinically meaningful changes in walking speed which are significant for motor-incomplete SCI. Further research exploring the mechanism for the presence of a training effect may be beneficial in targeting therapies for future rehabilitation.
CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the presence of a training effect for rehabilitation of walking function in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) through daily use of functional electrical stimulation (FES). SETTING: A specialist FESoutpatient centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five participants (mean age 53, SD 15, range 18-80; mean years since diagnosis 9, range 5 months - 39 years) with drop foot and motor-incomplete SCI (T12 or higher, ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) able to ambulate 10 metres with the use of a walking stick or frame. INTERVENTIONS:FES of the peroneal nerve, glutei and hamstrings as clinically indicated over six months in the community. OUTCOME MEASURES: The data was analysed for a training effect (difference between unassisted ten metre walking speed at baseline and after six months) and orthotic effects (difference between walking speed with and without FES) initially on day one and after six months. The data was further analysed for a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) (>0.06 m/s). RESULTS: A clinically meaningful, significant change was observed for initial orthotic effect (0.13m/s, CI: 0.04-0.17, P = 0.013), total orthotic effect (0.11m/s, CI: 0.04-0.18, P = 0.017) and training effect (0.09m/s, CI: 0.02-0.16, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that daily independent use of FES may produce clinically meaningful changes in walking speed which are significant for motor-incomplete SCI. Further research exploring the mechanism for the presence of a training effect may be beneficial in targeting therapies for future rehabilitation.
Authors: M Wieler; R B Stein; M Ladouceur; M Whittaker; A W Smith; S Naaman; H Barbeau; J Bugaresti; E Aimone Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Ashraf S Gorgey; David R Dolbow; James D Dolbow; Refka K Khalil; David R Gater Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Brian A Karamian; Nicholas Siegel; Blake Nourie; Mijail D Serruya; Robert F Heary; James S Harrop; Alexander R Vaccaro Journal: J Orthop Traumatol Date: 2022-01-06