Literature DB >> 33647273

Daily acute intermittent hypoxia combined with walking practice enhances walking performance but not intralimb motor coordination in persons with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Andrew Q Tan1, Won Joon Sohn2, Avantika Naidu3, Randy D Trumbower4.   

Abstract

Persons living with incomplete spinal cord injuries (SCI) often struggle to regain independent walking due to deficits in walking mechanics. They often dedicate many weeks of gait training before benefits to emerge, with additional training needed for benefits to persist. Recent studies in humans with SCI found that daily bouts of breathing low oxygen (acute intermittent hypoxia, AIH) prior to locomotor training elicited persistent (weeks) improvement in overground walking speed and endurance. AIH-induced improvements in overground walking may result from changes in control strategies that also enhance intralimb coordination; however, this possibility remains untested. Here, we examined the extent to which daily AIH combined with walking practice (AIH + WALK) improved overground walking performance and intralimb motor coordination in persons with chronic, incomplete SCI.
METHODS: We recruited 11 persons with chronic (> 1 year), incomplete SCI to participate in a randomized, double-blind, balanced, crossover study. Participants first received either daily (5 consecutive days) AIH (15, 90-s episodes of 10.0% O2 with 60s intervals at 20.9% O2) or SHAM (15, 90s episodes at 20.9% O2 with 60s intervals at 20.9% O2) followed by 30-min of overground walking practice. They received the second treatment after a minimum 2-week washout period. We quantified overground walking performance, in terms of speed and endurance, using the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), respectively. We quantified intralimb motor coordination using kinematic variability measures of foot trajectory (i.e., endpoint variability, EV) and of inter-joint coupling between the hip and knee, as well as between the knee and ankle joints (i.e., angular coefficient of correspondence, ACC). We compared the changes in walking performance relative to baseline (BL) between daily AIH + WALK and daily SHAM+WALK on treatment day 5 (T5), 1-week follow-up (F1), and 2-weeks follow-up (F2). We also compared these changes between participants who used bilateral walking aids (N = 5) and those who did not. To assess the effects of daily AIH + WALK on intralimb coordination, we compared potential treatment-induced changes in EV and ACC relative to BL at F1 and F2.
RESULTS: Participants improved overground walking performance (speed and endurance) after daily AIH + WALK, but not SHAM+WALK. Following daily AIH + WALK, participants decreased their 10MWT time at T5 by 28% (95% CI 0.2-10.1 s, p = 0.04), F1 by 28% (95% CI 1.1-13.5 s, p = 0.01), and F2 by 27% (95% CI 1.4-13.9 s, p = 0.01) relative to BL. The greatest decreases in the 10MWT occurred in participants who used bilateral walking aids (p < 0.05). We also found daily AIH + WALK resulted in an increase in 6MWT distance at T5 by 22% (95% CI 13.3-72.6 m, p = 0.001), F1 by 21% (95% CI 13.1-72.5 m, p = 0.001), and F2 by 16% (95% CI 2.9-62.2 m, p = 0.02). However, measures of EV and ACC during self-selected walking conditions did not change following daily AIH + WALK (all p-values >0.50).
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior studies, daily AIH + WALK triggered improvements in walking speed and endurance that persisted for weeks after treatment. Greatest improvements in speed occurred in participants who used bilateral walking aids. No change in EV and ACC may suggest that intralimb motor coordination was not a significant gait training priority during daily AIH + WALK.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute intermittent hypoxia; Angular coefficient of correspondence; Endpoint variability; Incomplete spinal cord injury; Motor coordination; Rehabilitation; Walking; Walking aid

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33647273      PMCID: PMC8119335          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.620


  48 in total

1.  Treadmill walking in incomplete spinal-cord-injured subjects: 1. Adaptation to changes in speed.

Authors:  A Pépin; K E Norman; H Barbeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Clinical research: a novel approach to the analysis of repeated measures.

Authors:  Ton J Cleophas; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Bas van Ouwerkerk
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Delayed Intervention with Intermittent Hypoxia and Task Training Improves Forelimb Function in a Rat Model of Cervical Spinal Injury.

Authors:  Erin J Prosser-Loose; Atiq Hassan; Gordon S Mitchell; Gillian D Muir
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Is body-weight-supported treadmill training or robotic-assisted gait training superior to overground gait training and other forms of physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  J Mehrholz; L A Harvey; S Thomas; B Elsner
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Kinematic adaptations of spinal cord-injured subjects during obstructed walking.

Authors:  Michel Ladouceur; Hugues Barbeau; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  BDNF-exercise interactions in the recovery of symmetrical stepping after a cervical hemisection in rats.

Authors:  Z Ying; R R Roy; H Zhong; S Zdunowski; V R Edgerton; F Gomez-Pinilla
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  BDNF is necessary and sufficient for spinal respiratory plasticity following intermittent hypoxia.

Authors:  Tracy L Baker-Herman; David D Fuller; Ryan W Bavis; Andrea G Zabka; Francis J Golder; Nicholas J Doperalski; Rebecca A Johnson; Jyoti J Watters; Gordon S Mitchell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-14       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Improvements in skilled walking associated with kinematic adaptations in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raza N Malik; Gevorg Eginyan; Andrea K Lynn; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on hand use after spinal cord trauma: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; Heather B Hayes; Gordon S Mitchell; Steven L Wolf; Victoria A Stahl
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic acute intermittent hypoxia: A translational roadmap for spinal cord injury and neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Alicia K Vose; Joseph F Welch; Jayakrishnan Nair; Erica A Dale; Emily J Fox; Gillian D Muir; Randy D Trumbower; Gordon S Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Respiratory Training and Plasticity After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Margo Randelman; Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Stéphane Vinit; Michael A Lane
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 6.147

3.  Effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on corticospinal excitability within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Shivani Radia; Ann-Maree Vallence; Hakuei Fujiyama; Rose Fitzpatrick; Sarah Etherington; Brendan R Scott; Olivier Girard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Development Technologies for the Monitoring of Six-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ivan Miguel Pires; Hanna Vitaliyivna Denysyuk; María Vanessa Villasana; Juliana Sá; Diogo Luís Marques; José Francisco Morgado; Carlos Albuquerque; Eftim Zdravevski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.