| Literature DB >> 29108364 |
Szabina Szujo1, Livia Sira2, Laszlo Bajnok1, Beata Bodis1, Ferenc Gyory3, Orsolya Nemes1, Karoly Rucz1, Peter Kenyeres1, Zsuzsanna Valkusz4, Krisztian Sepp4, Erzsebet Schmidt5, Zsuszanna Szabo5, Sarolta Szekeres5, Katalin Zambo5, Sandor Barna6, Endre V Nagy2, Emese Mezosi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: SPECT/CT has numerous advantages over planar and traditional SPECT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of post-radioiodine therapy SPECT/CT of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in early risk classification and in prediction of late prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 323 consecutive patients were investigated after their first radioiodine treatment (1100-3700 MBq). Both whole body scan and SPECT/CT images of the head, neck, chest and abdomen regions were taken 4-6 days after radioiodine therapy. Patients were re-evaluated 9-12 months later as well as at the end of follow up (median 37 months).Entities:
Keywords: ATA risk classification; ETA risk classification; SPECT/CT; differentiated thyroid cancer; radioiodine therapy
Year: 2017 PMID: 29108364 PMCID: PMC5668097 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patients’ demographics (n = 323)
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
The distribution of metastases according to SPECT/CT results in the original ATA risk categories (n = 323)
| ATA - low risk | ATA - intermediate risk | ATA - high risk (26 patients) | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 125 | 122 | 6 | ||
| 10 | 35 | 16 | ||
| 2 | 3 | 8 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
Figure 1Anterior and posterior whole body scan (A) and SPECT/CT (B) images of a papillary cancer patient with lymph node and pulmonary metastases (arrows).
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the currently used risk stratification systems, SPECT/CT and one-year data at the end of follow-up (median 37 months, n = 315) in different disease stages
| Stage I | Stage II | Stage III | Stage IV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57,5 | 50,0 | 22,9 | 44,7 | |
| 71,5 | 82,1 | 11,4 | 44,7 | |
| 75,2 | 67,9 | 74,3 | 68,4 | |
| 93,0 | 96,4 | 97,1 | 97,4 |
Risk stratification of American Thyroid Association (ATA risk), Risk stratification of European Thyroid Association (ETA risk), Risk stratification of American Thyroid Association after SPECT/CT (ATA after SPECT/CT) and SPECT/CT alone (SPECT/CT).
A) ATA risk classification
| Before SPECT/CT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | intermediate | high | TOTAL | ||
| 124 | 83 | 5 | 212 | ||
| 11 | 70 | 7 | 88 | ||
| 3 | 6 | 14 | 23 | ||
| TOTAL | 138 | 159 | 26 | 323 | |
B) Clinical stages
| Before SPECT/CT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | TOTAL | ||
| 208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 208 | ||
| 1 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 27 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 34 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 5 | 40 | 54 | ||
| 219 | 28 | 36 | 40 | 323 | ||
A) At one-year after RAI treatment
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Diagnostic accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76,6 | 47,4 | 27,1 | 88,8 | 53,3 | |
| 70,3 | 62,2 | 32,1 | 89,1 | 63,8 | |
| 65,6 | 73,3 | 38,5 | 89,3 | 71,7 | |
Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Risk stratification of American Thyroid Association (ATA), Risk stratification of European Thyroid Association (ETA), Risk stratification of American Thyroid Association after SPECT/CT (ATA after SPECT/CT) and SPECT/CT alone (SPECT/CT).
*Sensitivity of SPECT/CT compared to the ATA classification was significantly lower (p = 0.021).
**Specificity of SPECT/CT was significantly higher than any other classification (p < 0.001).
***Diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT was significantly better than any other classification (p < 0.001).
B) At the end of follow-up (median 37 months, n = 315)
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Diagnostic accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80,4 | 46,5 | 20,4 | 93,3 | 51,4 | |
| 73,9 | 60,6 | 24,3 | 93,1 | 62,5 | |
| 78,3 | 72,9 | 33,0 | 95,1 | 73,7 | |
| 71,7 | 47,8 | 94,7 | |||
| 71,9 | 100 |
*No significant differences in sensitivities were found except in case of one-year reclassification (p < 0.01).
**Specificities of the individual parameters differed significantly, the one-year reclassification had the highest value (p < 0.01). The specificity of SPECT/CT was also significantly better than the values of the ATA and ETA risk classifications (p < 0.001).
***Diagnostic accuracy of one-year reclassification was excellent but not significantly better than that of SPECT/CT (p = 0.59). Both method provided better prediction than ATA, ETA and ATA after SPECT/CT classifications (p < 0.01).