PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare (131)I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS), WBS with (131)I single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the detection of distant metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: A total of 140 patients with 258 foci of suspected distant metastases were evaluated. (131)I WBS, (131)I SPECT/CT, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT images were interpreted separately. The final diagnosis was obtained from histopathologic study, serum thyroglobulin level, other imaging modalities, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients with 258 foci, 46 patients with 166 foci were diagnosed as positive for distant metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality were 65, 55, and 59%, respectively, for (131)I WBS; 65, 95, and 85% for (131)I SPECT/CT, respectively; and 61, 98, and 86%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patient-based analyses. Lesion-based analyses demonstrated that both SPECT/CT and PET/CT were superior to WBS (p<0.001) in all patient groups. SPECT/CT was superior to WBS and PET/CT (p<0.001) in patients who received a single challenge of radioiodine therapy, whereas PET/CT was superior to WBS (p=0.005) and SPECT/CT (p=0.013) in patients who received multiple challenges. CONCLUSION: Both SPECT/CT and PET/CT demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting metastatic thyroid cancer. SPECT/CT was highly accurate in patients who underwent a single challenge of radioiodine therapy. In contrast, (18)F-FDG PET/CT presented the highest diagnostic performance in patients who underwent multiple challenges of radioiodine therapy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare (131)I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS), WBS with (131)I single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the detection of distant metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: A total of 140 patients with 258 foci of suspected distant metastases were evaluated. (131)I WBS, (131)I SPECT/CT, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT images were interpreted separately. The final diagnosis was obtained from histopathologic study, serum thyroglobulin level, other imaging modalities, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients with 258 foci, 46 patients with 166 foci were diagnosed as positive for distant metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality were 65, 55, and 59%, respectively, for (131)I WBS; 65, 95, and 85% for (131)I SPECT/CT, respectively; and 61, 98, and 86%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patient-based analyses. Lesion-based analyses demonstrated that both SPECT/CT and PET/CT were superior to WBS (p<0.001) in all patient groups. SPECT/CT was superior to WBS and PET/CT (p<0.001) in patients who received a single challenge of radioiodine therapy, whereas PET/CT was superior to WBS (p=0.005) and SPECT/CT (p=0.013) in patients who received multiple challenges. CONCLUSION: Both SPECT/CT and PET/CT demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting metastatic thyroid cancer. SPECT/CT was highly accurate in patients who underwent a single challenge of radioiodine therapy. In contrast, (18)F-FDG PET/CT presented the highest diagnostic performance in patients who underwent multiple challenges of radioiodine therapy.
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Steven I Sherman; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Richard J Robbins; Qiang Wan; Ravinder K Grewal; Roland Reibke; Mithat Gonen; H William Strauss; R Michael Tuttle; William Drucker; Steven M Larson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-11-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: G Ronga; M Filesi; T Montesano; A D Di Nicola; C Pace; L Travascio; G Ventroni; A Antonaci; A R Vestri Journal: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.346
Authors: S Kohlfuerst; I Igerc; M Lobnig; H J Gallowitsch; I Gomez-Segovia; S Matschnig; J Mayr; P Mikosch; M Beheshti; P Lind Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 9.236