PURPOSE: In the present study, we performed a systematic review of the current literature to assess the incremental value of (131)I single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: The search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify studies and reference lists for articles was conducted using the terms "SPECT or SPECT/CT or SPECT-CT or single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and thyroid carcinoma or thyroid cancer." Studies reporting the clinical value of (131)I SPECT/CT were selected. All studies included were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2). Two independent reviewers selected the studies, summarized and tabulated the data, and pooled estimates were obtained. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 1,066 patients met the inclusion criteria. Data obtained included the impact of (131)I SPECT/CT on staging or risk classification (three studies), diagnostic accuracy (six studies), and follow-up (five studies). CONCLUSION: Integrated SPECT/CT is a useful tool for the diagnosis, staging, risk stratification, and follow-up of DTC. The impact of (131)I SPECT/CT on the management of patients with thyroid cancer was evaluated.
PURPOSE: In the present study, we performed a systematic review of the current literature to assess the incremental value of (131)I single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: The search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify studies and reference lists for articles was conducted using the terms "SPECT or SPECT/CT or SPECT-CT or single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and thyroid carcinoma or thyroid cancer." Studies reporting the clinical value of (131)I SPECT/CT were selected. All studies included were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2). Two independent reviewers selected the studies, summarized and tabulated the data, and pooled estimates were obtained. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 1,066 patients met the inclusion criteria. Data obtained included the impact of (131)I SPECT/CT on staging or risk classification (three studies), diagnostic accuracy (six studies), and follow-up (five studies). CONCLUSION: Integrated SPECT/CT is a useful tool for the diagnosis, staging, risk stratification, and follow-up of DTC. The impact of (131)I SPECT/CT on the management of patients with thyroid cancer was evaluated.
Authors: E Even-Sapir; Z Keidar; J Sachs; A Engel; L Bettman; D Gaitini; L Guralnik; N Werbin; G Iosilevsky; O Israel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R Michael Tuttle; Hernan Tala; Jatin Shah; Rebecca Leboeuf; Ronald Ghossein; Mithat Gonen; Matvey Brokhin; Gal Omry; James A Fagin; Ashok Shaha Journal: Thyroid Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: K Tharp; O Israel; J Hausmann; L Bettman; W H Martin; M Daitzchman; M P Sandler; D Delbeke Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-06-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gary L Francis; Steven G Waguespack; Andrew J Bauer; Peter Angelos; Salvatore Benvenga; Janete M Cerutti; Catherine A Dinauer; Jill Hamilton; Ian D Hay; Markus Luster; Marguerite T Parisi; Marianna Rachmiel; Geoffrey B Thompson; Shunichi Yamashita Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Jérôme Clerc; Frederik A Verburg; Anca M Avram; Luca Giovanella; Elif Hindié; David Taïeb Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julia V Malamitsi; John T Koutsikos; Stamatia I Giourgouli; Sophia F Zachaki; Theodoros A Pipikos; Fani J Vlachou; Vassilios K Prassopoulos Journal: In Vivo Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.155