| Literature DB >> 29104611 |
Leonardo Russo1, Luis Betancourt1, Gabriel Romero1, Alí Godoy1, Laura Bergamo1, Rafael Delgado1, Ángela Ruiz1, Marianna Gutiérrez1, Eduardo Salas1, Maria Puzzi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the false-negative rate, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy of the frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in early-stage breast cancer compared to the definitive section and to identify the factors that could be associated with the appearance of false-negative cases. Secondarily, to evaluate the pathological results of cases submitted to completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for positive SLN.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; frozen section; micrometastases; sentinel lymph node biopsy
Year: 2017 PMID: 29104611 PMCID: PMC5659822 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecancermedicalscience ISSN: 1754-6605
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients.
| Characteristics | N° (%) |
|---|---|
| Patients (n) | 281 (100) |
| Age (years): median (range) | 54 (24–90) |
| Tumour size (pT) | |
| Nodal status (pN) | |
| AJCC 7°ed staging | |
| Histological grade | |
| Histological type | |
| Lymphovascular involvement | |
| Multicentricity | |
| Type of surgery | |
| Condition of the rest of the axilla |
MPO: oncologic partial mastectomy, SLNB: sentinel lymph node biopsy, TSM: total simple mastectomy, ALND: axillary lymph node dissection, Mt: metastatic
Comparison of frozen section versus definitive section of sentinel lymph node biopsy.
| Frozen section | Definitive section | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | |
| Positive | 58 | 2 | 60 |
| Negative | 18 | 203 | 221 |
| Total | 76 | 205 | 281 |
| Sensitivity % | 76.30 | ||
| Specificity% | 99.02 | ||
| False-negative rate % | 23.70 | ||
| Positive prediction rate % | 96.70 | ||
| Negative prediction rate % | 91.90 | ||
| Diagnostic accuracy % | 92.88 | ||
False-negative rate and sensitivity of frozen section of sentinel lymph node by related pathological factors.
| Variables | N° (%) | TP | FN | Se % | FNR % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 281 (100) | 58 | 18 | 76.3 | 23.7 | – |
| Micrometastasis | 15 (19.7) | 5 | 10 | 33.3 | 66.7 | |
| Macrometastasis | 61 (80.3) | 53 | 8 | 86.9 | 13.1 | |
| ≤ 2 | 50 (65.8) | 42 | 8 | 84.0 | 16.0 | |
| > 2 | 26 (34.2) | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 38.5 | |
| ≤ 2 cm | 37 (48.7) | 29 | 8 | 78.4 | 21.6 | 0.680 |
| > 2 cm | 39 (51.3) | 29 | 10 | 74.4 | 25.6 | |
| Absent | 29 (38.2) | 22 | 7 | 75.9 | 24.1 | 0.942 |
| Present | 47 (61.8) | 36 | 11 | 76.6 | 23.4 | |
| Absent | 68 (89.5) | 52 | 16 | 76.5 | 23.5 | 0.926 |
| Present | 8 (10.5) | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 25.0 | |
Bold values represent statistical significance. TP: true positives, FN: false negatives, Se: sensitivity, FNR: false-negative rate, SLN: sentinel lymph node
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of false-negative rate of SLNs.
| TP | FN | TFN (%) | OR, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 281 (100) | 58 | 18 | 23.7 | – | – |
| Micrometastasis | 15 (19.7) | 5 | 10 | 66.7 | 13.25 (3.6–48.9) | |
| Macrometastasis | 61 (80.3) | 53 | 8 | 13.1 | 1 | |
| > 2 | 26 (34.2) | 16 | 10 | 38.5 | 3.28 (1.1–9.8) | 0.373 |
| ≤ 2 | 50 (65.8) | 42 | 8 | 16.0 | 1 | |
| > 2 cm | 39 (51,3) | 29 | 10 | 25.6 | 1.25 (0.4–3.6) | 0.508 |
| ≤ 2 cm | 37 (48,7) | 29 | 8 | 21.6 | 1 | |
| Absent | 29 (38.2) | 22 | 7 | 24.1 | 1.04 (0.4–3.1) | 0.503 |
| Present | 47 (61.8) | 36 | 11 | 23.4 | 1 | |
| Present | 8 (10.5) | 6 | 2 | 25.0 | 1.08 (0.2–5.9) | 0.563 |
| Absent | 68 (89.5) | 52 | 16 | 23.5 | 1 | |
Bold values represent statistical significance. TP: true positives, FN: false negative, Se: sensitivity, FNR: false negative rate, SLN: sentinel lymph node, OR: odds ratio.
Analysis of patients with positive SLN submitted to completion ALND.
| Completion ALND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 16 | 1 | |
| (70.7) | (27.6) | (1.7) | |
| 3 | 2 | 13 | |
| (16.7) | (11.1) | (72.2) | |
SLN: sentinel lymph node, ALND: axillary lymph node dissection, ALN: axillary lymph nodes