Literature DB >> 18156934

Does the benefit of sentinel node frozen section vary between patients with invasive duct, invasive lobular, and favorable histologic subtypes of breast cancer?

Sharon Wing-wai Chan1, Katherine A LaVigne, Elisa R Port, Jane V Fey, Edi Brogi, Patrick I Borgen, Hiram S Cody.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many questions regarding sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer have been answered by observational studies and, increasingly, by prospective trials, the role of intraoperative SLN assessment remains a matter of debate. Here we report in detail the results of intraoperative SLN assessment by frozen section (FS), with particular attention to variations in sensitivity and yield by histologic subtype, by tumor size, and by other clinicopathologic parameters.
METHODS: Five thousand two hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients with clinical stage T1-3N0 invasive breast carcinoma had SLN biopsy with intraoperative FS at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1996 and 2004. We report the results of FS by sensitivity (the proportion of all positive SLN detected by FS) and by yield (the proportion of all FS procedures in which the FS was positive).
RESULTS: The sensitivity of FS was 61% overall, was higher for invasive duct (ID) than for invasive lobular (IL) cancers (62% vs. 52%; P = 0.006), and was marginally lower for favorable subtypes (46%; P = 0.26). The yield of FS was 21% overall, with no difference between ID and IL cancers (22% vs. 21%; P = 0.49), and with a substantially lower yield for favorable subtypes (3%; P < 0.001). The yield of FS increased with tumor size for ID and IL cancers (P < 0.001), but not for favorable subtypes. For both ID and IL cancers, the sensitivity and yield of FS were significantly higher with younger patient age, increasing tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion. The yield of FS was <10% for all patients with ID or IL tumors < or =1 cm in size who were older than 60 years of age. Among all FS-positive patients, only 45% were identified by the first FS, whereas 91% were cumulatively identified by the first, second, or third FS.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ID and IL cancers, the overall sensitivity of FS is >50%, but the yield of FS is <10% for individuals > or =60 years of age with T1a/b tumors. Intraoperative FS may not be worthwhile for this low-yield subset, especially for patients with invasive breast cancer of favorable type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18156934     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181581f41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  A 10-year trend analysis of sentinel lymph node frozen section and completion axillary dissection for breast cancer: are these procedures becoming obsolete?

Authors:  Walter P Weber; Mitchel Barry; Michelle M Stempel; Manuela J Junqueira; Anne A Eaton; Sujata M Patil; Monica Morrow; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The value of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in surgical management of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Calogero Cipolla; Daniela Cabibi; Salvatore Fricano; Salvatore Vieni; Irene Gentile; Mario Adelfio Latteri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Breast cancer histology and receptor status characterization in Asian Indian and Pakistani women in the U.S.--a SEER analysis.

Authors:  Madhuri Kakarala; Laura Rozek; Michele Cote; Samadhi Liyanage; Dean E Brenner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Can We Skip Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes? Nomogram Predicting Involvement of Three or More Axillary Lymph Nodes before Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Soo Kyung Ahn; Min Kyoon Kim; Jongjin Kim; Eunshin Lee; Tae-Kyung Yoo; Han-Byoel Lee; Young Joon Kang; Jisun Kim; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Wonshik Han
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Evaluation of the benefit of routine intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  C M T P Francissen; R F D van la Parra; A H Mulder; A M Bosch; W K de Roos
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16

7.  Comparison of intraoperative frozen section analysis for sentinel lymph node biopsy during breast cancer surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  James W Horvath; Gary E Barnett; Rafael E Jimenez; Donn C Young; Stephen P Povoski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Frozen section evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Russo; Luis Betancourt; Gabriel Romero; Alí Godoy; Laura Bergamo; Rafael Delgado; Ángela Ruiz; Marianna Gutiérrez; Eduardo Salas; Maria Puzzi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.