Literature DB >> 29103833

Fluctuating asymmetry of the normal facial skeleton.

J Gateño1, T L Jones2, S G F Shen3, K-C Chen4, A Jajoo5, T Kuang6, J D English7, M Nicol5, J F Teichgraeber8, J J Xia9.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce reliable estimations of fluctuating facial asymmetry in a normal population. Fifty-four computed tomography (CT) facial models of average-looking and symmetrical Chinese subjects with a class I occlusion were used in this study. Eleven midline landmarks and 12 pairs of bilateral landmarks were digitized. The repeatability of the landmark digitization was first evaluated. A Procrustes analysis was then used to measure the fluctuating asymmetry of each CT model, after all of the models had been scaled to the average face size of the study sample. A principal component analysis was finally used to establish the direction of the fluctuating asymmetries. The results showed that there was excellent absolute agreement among the three repeated measurements. The mean fluctuating asymmetry of the average-size face varied at each anthropometric landmark site, ranging from 1.0mm to 2.8mm. At the 95% upper limit, the asymmetries ranged from 2.2mm to 5.7mm. Most of the asymmetry of the midline structures was mediolateral, while the asymmetry of the bilateral landmarks was more equally distributed. These values are for the average face. People with larger faces will have higher values, while subjects with smaller faces will have lower values.
Copyright © 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Procrustes analysis; computed tomography; fluctuating asymmetry; normal facial skeleton; principal component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103833      PMCID: PMC5845815          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  26 in total

1.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces.

Authors:  S Peck; L Peck; M Kataja
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A radiographic study of facial asymmetry.

Authors:  A B Hewitt
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1975-01

Review 3.  Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1990-05

6.  State-of-the-art three-dimensional analysis of soft tissue changes following Le Fort I maxillary advancement.

Authors:  A Almukhtar; A Ayoub; B Khambay; J McDonald; X Ju
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex.

Authors:  S M Shah; M R Joshi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The primal sagittal plane of the head: a new concept.

Authors:  J Gateno; A Jajoo; M Nicol; J J Xia
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Angela Rita Pontes Azevedo; Guilherme Janson; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry.

Authors:  Nermin Morgan; Sohaib Shujaat; Omid Jazil; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation.

Authors:  Maggie K Grissom; Jaime Gateno; Jeryl D English; Helder B Jacob; Tianshu Kuang; Carla E Gonzalez; Peng Yuan; Hannah H Deng; Caleb J Frick; Daeseung Kim; Abdullahi Hassan; James J Xia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Transverse Asymmetries of the Maxilla Even in Healthy and Apparently Symmetrical Subjects.

Authors:  Giuseppe Currò; Giuseppa Bilello; Pietro Messina; Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Po-Jung Hsu; Rafael Denadai; Betty C J Pai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.