Literature DB >> 29101462

The validity of arterial measurements in a South African embalmed body population.

Marelize Schoeman1, Albert van Schoor2, Farhana Suleman3, Liebie Louw4, Peet du Toit5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the normal arterial diameter at a given anatomical point is the first step toward quantifying the severity of cardiovascular diseases. According to several studies, parameters such as weight, height, age and sex can explain morphometric variations in arterial anatomy that are observed in a population. Before the development of a reference database against which to compare the diameters of arteries in a variety of pathological conditions, the compatibility between embalmed body measurements and computed tomography (CT) measurements must first be established.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare embalmed body measurements and CT measurements at 19 different arterial sites to establish whether embalmed body measurements are a true reflection of a living population.
METHODS: A total of 154 embalmed bodies were randomly selected from the Department of Anatomy at the University of Pretoria and 36 embalmed bodies were randomly selected from the Department of Human Anatomy at the University of Limpopo, Medunsa Campus. Dissections were performed on the embalmed body sample and the arterial dimensions were measured with a mechanical dial-sliding caliper (accuracy of 0.01 mm). 30 CT images for each of the 19 arterial sites were retrospectively selected from the database of radiographic images at the Department of Radiology, Steve Biko Academic Hospital. Radiant, a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer was used to analyze the CT images.
RESULTS: The only statistically significant differences between the embalmed body measurements and CT measurements were found in the left common carotid- and the left subclavian arteries. The null hypothesis of no statistically significant difference between the embalmed body and CT measurements was accepted since the P value indicated no significant difference for 87% of the measurements, the exception being the left common carotid- and the left subclavian arteries.
CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of two measurements, measurements in embalmed bodies and living people are interchangeable and concerns regarding the effect of distortion and shrinkage are unfounded. Even small changes in arterial diameter greatly influence blood flow and blood pressure, which contribute to undesirable clinical outcomes such as aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections. This study completes the first step towards the development of a reference database against which to compare the diameters of arteries in a variety of pathological conditions in a South African population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial dimensions; Arterial measurements; Computed tomography arterial measurements; Morphometric variation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101462     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-017-1938-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  An improved low-formaldehyde embalming fluid to preserve cadavers for anatomy teaching.

Authors:  R Coleman; I Kogan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Measurement of the abdominal aorta after intravenous aortography in health and arteriosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  C R Steinberg; M Archer; I Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1965-11

3.  Age-related changes in the abdominal aorta shown by computed tomography.

Authors:  A K Dixon; J P Lawrence; J R Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Cardiovascular risk factors associated with enlarged diameter of the abdominal aortic and iliac arteries in healthy women.

Authors:  Ami S Patel; Rachel H Mackey; Rachel P Wildman; Trina Thompson; Karen Matthews; Lewis Kuller; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender, and body surface area.

Authors:  W H Pearce; M S Slaughter; S LeMaire; A N Salyapongse; J Feinglass; W J McCarthy; J S Yao
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Effect of aging on aortic morphology in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension and atherosclerosis. Comparison between occidental and Chinese communities.

Authors:  R Virmani; A P Avolio; W J Mergner; M Robinowitz; E E Herderick; J F Cornhill; S Y Guo; T H Liu; D Y Ou; M O'Rourke
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation.

Authors:  J T Dodge; B G Brown; E L Bolson; H T Dodge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Normal aortoiliac diameters by CT.

Authors:  D Horejs; P M Gilbert; S Burstein; R L Vogelzang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.