BACKGROUND: An aortic aneurysm is defined as a 50% or greater increase in diameter compared with normal levels or the level of the left renal vein. However, normal diameters for many aortic segments are not known, and the aortic segment at the left renal vein may be enlarged. The purpose of this study was to determine normal diameters of the thoracic and abdominal aortas in relationship to age, gender, and body size. METHODS: Aortic diameters (ADs) were determined at four anatomic levels: thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta at the celiac axis, renal arteries, and midway between the renal arteries and the bifurcation. ADs were determined with the use of a video analyzer and an electronic caliper. Computed tomographic scans (n = 389) obtained for nonvascular diagnoses were analyzed according to gender, age, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: At all levels and in each decade the AD is significantly greater in men than in women (p < 0.0001). BSA is a better predictor of size than height or weight. AD increased with age at all levels, and there was a positive correlation between the AD and BSA and gender. Expected ADs for each aortic segment may be calculated according to regression equations. Age-, gender-, and BSA-matched patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms revealed significant enlargements in all proximal aortic segments. CONCLUSIONS: AD at a given level is a function of gender, age, and BSA. When these variables are known, it is possible to calculate an expected AD. The AD is greater at all levels in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and in men compared with women.
BACKGROUND: An aortic aneurysm is defined as a 50% or greater increase in diameter compared with normal levels or the level of the left renal vein. However, normal diameters for many aortic segments are not known, and the aortic segment at the left renal vein may be enlarged. The purpose of this study was to determine normal diameters of the thoracic and abdominal aortas in relationship to age, gender, and body size. METHODS: Aortic diameters (ADs) were determined at four anatomic levels: thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta at the celiac axis, renal arteries, and midway between the renal arteries and the bifurcation. ADs were determined with the use of a video analyzer and an electronic caliper. Computed tomographic scans (n = 389) obtained for nonvascular diagnoses were analyzed according to gender, age, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: At all levels and in each decade the AD is significantly greater in men than in women (p < 0.0001). BSA is a better predictor of size than height or weight. AD increased with age at all levels, and there was a positive correlation between the AD and BSA and gender. Expected ADs for each aortic segment may be calculated according to regression equations. Age-, gender-, and BSA-matched patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms revealed significant enlargements in all proximal aortic segments. CONCLUSIONS: AD at a given level is a function of gender, age, and BSA. When these variables are known, it is possible to calculate an expected AD. The AD is greater at all levels in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and in men compared with women.
Authors: Tri-Linh C Lu; Christoph H Huber; Elena Rizzo; Jashmid Dehmeshki; Ludwig K von Segesser; Salah D Qanadli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Elisabet Domínguez; Jesús Ruberte; José Ríos; Rosa Novellas; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo; Marc Navarro; Yvonne Espada Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Venkataramu N Krishnamurthy; Muhammad Naeem; Timothy P Murphy; Joselyn Cerezo; Paul Gaither Jordan; Suzanne H Goldberg; Abby G Ershow; Alan T Hirsch; Niki Oldenburg; Donald E Cutlip Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: G A Laughlin; M A Allison; N E Jensky; V Aboyans; N D Wong; R Detrano; M H Criqui Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Song Shou Mao; Nasir Ahmadi; Birju Shah; Daniel Beckmann; Annie Chen; Luan Ngo; Ferdinand R Flores; Yan Lin Gao; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Stefan Wolf; Alexander Riess; Julia F Landscheidt; Christianto B Lumenta; Patrick Friederich; Ludwig Schürer Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 9.097