Literature DB >> 29101458

Elastic stains in the evaluation of DCIS with comedo necrosis in breast cancers.

Tamás Zombori1, Gábor Cserni2,3.   

Abstract

As concerns the microscopic morphology of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), neoplastic cells are surrounded by both a myoepithelial cell layer and a basement membrane as expected from the outer structure of ducts and lobules. However, in some cases, it is impossible to state whether the structures involved by the disease are ducts or lobules. Altogether 1220 anatomic structures involved by DCIS displaying comedo necrosis from 27 slides of 21 patients (seen on both haematoxylin and eosin-stained and orcein-stained slides) were identified as representing ducts, likely ducts, unclassifiable structures, likely acini or acini on the basis of their distribution and resemblance to normal anatomic structures. All structures were then rated as having a circumferential elastic layer (as normal ducts), a partial elastic layer around more or less than half of the periphery or having no peripheral elastic layer at all (as normal acini). Structures classified as ducts or likely ducts were likely to have an elastic coating, whereas acini and likely acini had no such coating. Unclassifiable structures were generally devoid of an elastic layer. Structures (and cases) that were likely to represent neoductgenesis as proposed by Zhou et al. (Int J Breast Cancer 2014;2014:581706) were generally unclassifiable and devoid of outer elastic layer. Many duct-like structures in DCIS with comedo necrosis are devoid of elastic layer typical of normal ducts, suggesting that these structures are abnormal despite conservation of the myoepithelium and the basement membrane.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Comedo necrosis; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Elastic stain; Neoductgenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101458     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2259-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  15 in total

1.  Lobular cancerization: incidence and differential diagnosis with lobular carcinoma in situ of breast.

Authors:  H Kerner; C Lichtig
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study.

Authors:  L Tabár; H H Chen; S W Duffy; M F Yen; C F Chiang; P B Dean; R A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pathological and mammographic prognostic factors for screen detected cancers in a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years.

Authors:  R L Bennett; A J Evans; E Kutt; C Record; L G Bobrow; I O Ellis; A Hanby; S M Moss
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Mammographic casting-type calcifications is not a prognostic factor in unifocal small invasive breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emeli Månsson; Leif Bergkvist; Gunilla Christenson; Carina Persson; Fredrik Wärnberg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Hsiu-Hsi Tony Chen; M F Amy Yen; Tibor Tot; Tao-Hsin Tung; Li-Sheng Chen; Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Stephen W Duffy; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Evaluation of p40 as a Myoepithelial Marker in Different Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Bence Kővári; A Marcell Szász; Janina Kulka; Zlatko Marušić; Bozena Šarčević; László Tiszlavicz; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Phenotypic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ-associated myoepithelial cells: biologic and diagnostic implications.

Authors:  Justin B Hilson; Stuart J Schnitt; Laura C Collins
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers?

Authors:  J J James; A J Evans; S E Pinder; R D Macmillan; A R M Wilson; I O Ellis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  The alveolar switch: coordinating the proliferative cues and cell fate decisions that drive the formation of lobuloalveoli from ductal epithelium.

Authors:  Samantha R Oakes; Heidi N Hilton; Christopher J Ormandy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Ductal Breast Carcinoma In Situ: Mammographic Features and Its Relation to Prognosis and Tumour Biology in a Population Based Cohort.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhou; Thomas Sollie; Tibor Tot; Carl Blomqvist; Shahin Abdsaleh; Göran Liljegren; Fredrik Wärnberg
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.