Literature DB >> 12565206

Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers?

J J James1, A J Evans, S E Pinder, R D Macmillan, A R M Wilson, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

AIM: It has been suggested that the use of traditional prognostic factors such as histological grade and lymph node stage are not reliable predictors of outcome for small (<15 mm diameter) screen-detected breast cancers. It has also been suggested that the presence of mammographic comedo (casting) microcalcifications may be an important prognostic factor. We have determined prognostic factors for small screen-detected cancers in a univariate and multivariate fashion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histological grade, lymph node stage, invasive tumour size and vascular invasion status was obtained on 161 consecutive patients with primary invasive breast cancer <15 mm diameter, detected by screening. The Nottingham Prognostic Index was calculated for each patient. The mammograms were assessed for the presence of microcalcifications, these being classified as either comedo or non-comedo. Survival data was also obtained.
RESULTS: Overall survival in this group of patients was excellent with only 12 patients (7.5%) dying from their breast cancer (mean follow-up 7.5 years). Univariate analysis showed a significant association between lymph stage and outcome (chi(2)=9.68, P=0.008). No significant association was demonstrated between the presence of comedo calcification and survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed lymph node stage as the only independent prognostic factor for these small screen-detected breast cancers (chi(2)=7.18, P=0.007). There were significant associations between the presence of comedo calcification on the screening mammogram and high histological grade and small tumour size.
CONCLUSION: Although the overall outcome for small screen-detected breast cancers (<15 mm diameter) is excellent, the presence of lymph node metastases is associated with a significant reduction in long-term survival. The presence of mammographic comedo calcification is not an independent prognostic factor, but is closely related to histological grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12565206     DOI: 10.1053/crad.2002.1110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  12 in total

1.  Microcalcification-Associated Breast Cancer: Presentation, Successful First Excision, Long-Term Recurrence and Survival Rate.

Authors:  Marga B Rominger; Carolin Steinmetz; Ronny Westerman; Annette Ramaswamy; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  A retrospective review of MRI features associated with metastasis-free survival in women with breast cancer: focusing on skin thickening and skin enhancement.

Authors:  Valentine Mberu; Jennifer McFarlane; E Jane Macaskill; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The association between mammographic calcifications and breast cancer prognostic factors in a population-based registry cohort.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Sheila S Lee; Thad S Benefield; Tiffany N Hoots; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Elastic stains in the evaluation of DCIS with comedo necrosis in breast cancers.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Breast Cancer: A Potential Application on Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

Authors:  Xi'E Hu; Jingyi Xue; Shujia Peng; Ping Yang; Zhenyu Yang; Lin Yang; Yanming Dong; Lijuan Yuan; Ting Wang; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?

Authors:  Mathew Purdom; Michael L Cibull; Terry D Stratton; Luis M Samayoa; Edward H Romond; Patrick C McGrath; Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2010-10-26

7.  Microcalcifications in breast cancer: novel insights into the molecular mechanism and functional consequence of mammary mineralisation.

Authors:  R F Cox; A Hernandez-Santana; S Ramdass; G McMahon; J H Harmey; M P Morgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Mammographic calcification can predict outcome in women with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Xiaomin Qi; Aoxiang Chen; Pei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xuchen Cao; Chunhua Xiao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Ductal Breast Carcinoma In Situ: Mammographic Features and Its Relation to Prognosis and Tumour Biology in a Population Based Cohort.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhou; Thomas Sollie; Tibor Tot; Carl Blomqvist; Shahin Abdsaleh; Göran Liljegren; Fredrik Wärnberg
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-02-14

10.  Mammographic casting-type calcification is an independent prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jian Cao; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Songjie Shen; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.